Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Pluralisme Pengaturan Umur Kecakapan Dalam Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan
View through CrossRef
SKMHT (Power of Attorney to Grant a Mortgage) shall be concluded through a notarial deed or Land Conveyancer’s deed as regulated in Article 15 paragraph (1) of Law No. 4 of 1996. Article 39 paragraph (1) of Law No. 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No. 2 of 2014 stipulate that an appearer before a Notary Public shall be minimum eighteen (18) years old. However, to conclude an SKMHT, PPAT (Land Conveyancer) applies the age requirement of minimum twenty-one (21) years old as regulated in the provision of article 330 of BW (Civil Code of the Republic of Indonesia). As such, there are two (2) contradictive age requirements to conclude an SKMHT, namely horizontal norm conflict (geschijld van normen) between Article 330 of BW and Article 39 paragraph (1) of Law No. 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No. 2 of 2004. Apart from the two (2) provisions referred to above, Law No. 1 of 1974 also regulates the age requirement, namely article 47 and article 50. The validity of SKMHT will affect the execution of APHT (Deed of Mortgage Granting) and the registration of mortgage granting. Based on the said backgrounds, the main subject of this study is what the age requirement should be in order to able to conclude an SKMHT, APHT and to register a Mortgage Granting. This study constitutes a normative legal study derived from the existing norm conflict between article 330 of BW and article 39 paragraph (1) of Law No. 30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No. 2 of 2014, and among article 330 of BW and article 47, article 50 and article 66 of Law No. 1 of 1974. Meanwhile, this study adopts the Statue Approach and Analytical & Conceptual Approach. The legal stuff resources come from primary legal stuff resources and secondary legal stuff resources. The methodology to collect legal stuff resources is the snow ball principle, where the resources were inventoried and identified in order to able to analyze the existing problems in this study. The results of this legal study indicate that normatively, an SKMHT shall be concluded by using the age requirement of eighteen (18) years old. However, Notary Public and PPAT in practice remain to adopt the age requirement of twenty-one (21) years old to conclude an SKMHT. PPAT should also apply the age requirement of eighteen (18) years old to conclude APHT. However, PPAT in practice remain to adopt the age requirement of twenty-one (21) years old. Therefore, the process to conclude an APHT will not be able to be carried out if the subject of notarized SKMHT is eighteen (18) years old. The same also applies to the registration of mortgage granting at the Land Office because the Land Office requires the age requirement of twenty-one (21) years old as regulated in the provision of Article 330 of BW. As a consequence, if the subject has not yet reached the minimum age requirement, the mortgage granting cannot be registered.
Title: Pluralisme Pengaturan Umur Kecakapan Dalam Pembebanan Hak Tanggungan
Description:
SKMHT (Power of Attorney to Grant a Mortgage) shall be concluded through a notarial deed or Land Conveyancer’s deed as regulated in Article 15 paragraph (1) of Law No.
4 of 1996.
Article 39 paragraph (1) of Law No.
30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No.
2 of 2014 stipulate that an appearer before a Notary Public shall be minimum eighteen (18) years old.
However, to conclude an SKMHT, PPAT (Land Conveyancer) applies the age requirement of minimum twenty-one (21) years old as regulated in the provision of article 330 of BW (Civil Code of the Republic of Indonesia).
As such, there are two (2) contradictive age requirements to conclude an SKMHT, namely horizontal norm conflict (geschijld van normen) between Article 330 of BW and Article 39 paragraph (1) of Law No.
30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No.
2 of 2004.
Apart from the two (2) provisions referred to above, Law No.
1 of 1974 also regulates the age requirement, namely article 47 and article 50.
The validity of SKMHT will affect the execution of APHT (Deed of Mortgage Granting) and the registration of mortgage granting.
Based on the said backgrounds, the main subject of this study is what the age requirement should be in order to able to conclude an SKMHT, APHT and to register a Mortgage Granting.
This study constitutes a normative legal study derived from the existing norm conflict between article 330 of BW and article 39 paragraph (1) of Law No.
30 of 2004 in conjunction with Law No.
2 of 2014, and among article 330 of BW and article 47, article 50 and article 66 of Law No.
1 of 1974.
Meanwhile, this study adopts the Statue Approach and Analytical & Conceptual Approach.
The legal stuff resources come from primary legal stuff resources and secondary legal stuff resources.
The methodology to collect legal stuff resources is the snow ball principle, where the resources were inventoried and identified in order to able to analyze the existing problems in this study.
The results of this legal study indicate that normatively, an SKMHT shall be concluded by using the age requirement of eighteen (18) years old.
However, Notary Public and PPAT in practice remain to adopt the age requirement of twenty-one (21) years old to conclude an SKMHT.
PPAT should also apply the age requirement of eighteen (18) years old to conclude APHT.
However, PPAT in practice remain to adopt the age requirement of twenty-one (21) years old.
Therefore, the process to conclude an APHT will not be able to be carried out if the subject of notarized SKMHT is eighteen (18) years old.
The same also applies to the registration of mortgage granting at the Land Office because the Land Office requires the age requirement of twenty-one (21) years old as regulated in the provision of Article 330 of BW.
As a consequence, if the subject has not yet reached the minimum age requirement, the mortgage granting cannot be registered.
Related Results
Pandangan MUI terhadap Pluralisme Agama
Pandangan MUI terhadap Pluralisme Agama
Religious pluralisme among Muslims itself raises pros and cons, acceptance on the one hand and resistance on the other. Supporters of religious pluralisme argue that this idea is a...
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Atas Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Atas Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah
Ketentuan pasal 6 Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggunan (UUHT) memberikan hak kepada Kreditur selaku pemegang hak tanggungan yakni “ Apabila debitur cedera janji, ...
Penerbitan Akta Konsen Roya Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Pengganti Sertipikat Hak Tanggungan Yang Hilang
Penerbitan Akta Konsen Roya Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Pengganti Sertipikat Hak Tanggungan Yang Hilang
Hapusnya hak tanggungan berdasarkan ketentuan pasal 18 ayat (1) UUHT mengharuskan dilakukannya roya terhadap hak tanggungan. Roya dilakukan apabila utang yang dijamin dalam perjanj...
Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Dipailitkan
Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Dipailitkan
Abstract
The right of encumbrance is one kind of guarantees that the debtor can promise to the creditor. In fu...
PENDAFTARAN HAK TANGGUNGAN OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH YANG MELAMPAUI BATAS WAKTU
PENDAFTARAN HAK TANGGUNGAN OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH YANG MELAMPAUI BATAS WAKTU
<div>Salah satu kegiatan bank adalah memberikan kredit kepada masyarakat. Bank dalam memberikan</div><div>kredit kepada nasabah dengan mensyratkan adanya jaminan ...
MEWUJUDKAN EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG BERKEADILAN DAN BERKEPASTIAN HUKUM
MEWUJUDKAN EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG BERKEADILAN DAN BERKEPASTIAN HUKUM
Dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi terhadap Hak Tanggungan, terdapat 3 (tiga) pihak yang memiliki kepentingan didalamnya, yaitu pihak kreditor selaku pemegang Hak Tanggungan yang be...
KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS JAMINAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN YANG SUDAH BERAKHIR JANGKA WAKTUNYA
KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS JAMINAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN YANG SUDAH BERAKHIR JANGKA WAKTUNYA
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui status hukum jaminan Hak Guna Bangunan yang masa berlakunya telah berakhir ketika masih terikat dengan perjanjian kredit masih berjalan d...
Tanggung Jawab PPAT (Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah) Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Secara Elektronik Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank
Tanggung Jawab PPAT (Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah) Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Secara Elektronik Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank
Sehubungan dibuatnya pelayanan Sistem Hak Tanggungan Elektronik dengan diterapkannya Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia No...

