Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Difficult implant removals
View through CrossRef
Purpose of review
Subdermal contraceptive implant insertions have rapidly increased worldwide. These devices are usually removed 3–5 years after insertion. Although removals are generally straightforward, difficult removals can occur. This review discusses the overall approach to potentially problematic removals and the appropriate steps to avoid complications and safely remove implants.
Recent findings
Given the rapid uptake of contraceptive implants and subsequent need for removals, an Implants Removal Task Force was formed to create standard protocols for difficult implant removals worldwide. These protocols detail how to identify a nonpalpable implant and the subsequent steps needed for safe removals that avoid vascular or neurological complications.
Summary
Rapid uptake of subdermal implants has created a need for a comprehensive approach in the unlikely setting of a difficult implant removal. Standard protocols now exist to aid clinicians in the safe removal of these implants.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Difficult implant removals
Description:
Purpose of review
Subdermal contraceptive implant insertions have rapidly increased worldwide.
These devices are usually removed 3–5 years after insertion.
Although removals are generally straightforward, difficult removals can occur.
This review discusses the overall approach to potentially problematic removals and the appropriate steps to avoid complications and safely remove implants.
Recent findings
Given the rapid uptake of contraceptive implants and subsequent need for removals, an Implants Removal Task Force was formed to create standard protocols for difficult implant removals worldwide.
These protocols detail how to identify a nonpalpable implant and the subsequent steps needed for safe removals that avoid vascular or neurological complications.
Summary
Rapid uptake of subdermal implants has created a need for a comprehensive approach in the unlikely setting of a difficult implant removal.
Standard protocols now exist to aid clinicians in the safe removal of these implants.
Related Results
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
A Comparative Study of Marginal Bone Loss in Immediate versus Delayed Implant Placement: A Longitudinal Analysis
A Comparative Study of Marginal Bone Loss in Immediate versus Delayed Implant Placement: A Longitudinal Analysis
Introduction:
The timing of dental implant placement – whether immediate after tooth extraction or delayed after a healing period – remains debatable. Immediate...
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Abstract
Background
Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone d...
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Dental implants have shown to be a reliable tool for single, multiple and full-arch rehabilitations 1. Dental implants have a very high success rate in terms of osseointegration, h...
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
AbstractBackgroundThe need for soft tissue grafting at implant sites for preventing and treating peri‐implant diseases is a currently investigated and debated topic.PurposeThe aim ...
Techniques to Remove Press-Fit Osseointegration Implants
Techniques to Remove Press-Fit Osseointegration Implants
Background:
Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees (TOFA) has proven to consistently, significantly improve the quality of life and...
Drivers and their influences on variation of aboveground carbon removals in miombo woodlands of mainland Tanzania
Drivers and their influences on variation of aboveground carbon removals in miombo woodlands of mainland Tanzania
Abstract
Background
Removals caused by both natural and anthropogenic drivers such as logging and fire causes substantial carbon emissions. Better insights into drivers an...
Effects of drivers and their variations on the number of stems and aboveground carbon removals in miombo woodlands of mainland Tanzania
Effects of drivers and their variations on the number of stems and aboveground carbon removals in miombo woodlands of mainland Tanzania
Abstract
Background
Removals caused by both natural and anthropogenic drivers such as logging and fire in miombo woodland...

