Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Femtosecond laser assisted phacoemulsification plus IOL implant: Toric IOL vs astigmatism keratotomy

View through CrossRef
Aims/Purpose: This study aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser‐assisted cataract surgery (FSACS) performing astigmatic keratotomy (AK) and toric intraocular lens (IOLt) implantation for astigmatism correction.Methods: Based on autorefractor and corneal topography, all patients underwent pre‐operative and postoperative examinations including comparatively assessing refractive astigmatism, best corrected visual acuity and corneal high order aberrations.Results: This retrospective case series comprised a total of 20 eyes (IOLt: AK = 10: 10) of 16 patients (mean age: 62.70 ± 1.89 years). Refraction status was 1.98 ± 0.22 in IOLt (0.75~3.00 D) vs 1.95 ± 0.23 in AK (0.55~3.08 D). The follow‐up periods 9.63 ± 1.15 months after surgery.Total corneal astigmatism (CAtot) were 1.73 ± 0.20 D in IOLt/2.28 ± 0.23 D in AK preoperatively and significantly (p < 0.01/p < 0.001) reduced to 0.80 ± 0.17 D in IOLt/1.13 ± 0.07 D in AK. The pre‐operative and postoperative reduction in astigmatism between IOLt (0.93 ± 0.32 D) and AK (1.15 ± 0.21) was not significantly (p = 0.56) different. However, anterior corneal astigmatism (CAant) were 1.99 ± 0.21 D in IOLt/1.95 ± 0.23 in AK preoperatively and not significantly/significantly (p = 0.36/p < 0.05) reduced to 1.73 ± 0.18 D in IOLt/1.10 ± 0.18 D in AK. Regarding CAant, the pre‐operative and postoperative reduction in astigmatism between IOLt (0.36 ± 0.25 D) and AK (0.69 ± 0.21 D) was not significantly (p = 0.3) different.Pre‐FSACS IOLt total corneal HOAs (0.47 ± 0.15) decreased, but not significantly, after FSACS IOLt (0.41 ± 0.11; p = 0.76). However, pre‐FSACS AK total corneal HOAs (0.19 ± 0.02) significantly increased after FSACS AK (0.29 ± 0.03; p < 0.01). Furthermore, the pre‐operative and postoperative changes in total corneal HOAs between IOLt (‐0.06 ± 0.04) and AK (0.10 ± 0.02 D) were significantly (p < 0.01) different.Best corrected visual acuity (Snellen E) was preoperatively 0.42 ± 0.02 in IOLt/0.38 ± 0.02 in AK and significantly (p < 0.001) increased to 0.82 ± 0.06 in IOLt/0.74 ± 0.07 in AK postoperatively. The preoperative and postoperative BCVA alteration was not significant between two groups (IOLt vs AK: 0.40 ± 0.04 vs 0.36 ± 0.07; p = 0.64).Conclusions: IOLt implantation efficient and harmless for correcting preoperative astigmatism in FSACS in a short period.
Title: Femtosecond laser assisted phacoemulsification plus IOL implant: Toric IOL vs astigmatism keratotomy
Description:
Aims/Purpose: This study aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser‐assisted cataract surgery (FSACS) performing astigmatic keratotomy (AK) and toric intraocular lens (IOLt) implantation for astigmatism correction.
Methods: Based on autorefractor and corneal topography, all patients underwent pre‐operative and postoperative examinations including comparatively assessing refractive astigmatism, best corrected visual acuity and corneal high order aberrations.
Results: This retrospective case series comprised a total of 20 eyes (IOLt: AK = 10: 10) of 16 patients (mean age: 62.
70 ± 1.
89 years).
Refraction status was 1.
98 ± 0.
22 in IOLt (0.
75~3.
00 D) vs 1.
95 ± 0.
23 in AK (0.
55~3.
08 D).
The follow‐up periods 9.
63 ± 1.
15 months after surgery.
Total corneal astigmatism (CAtot) were 1.
73 ± 0.
20 D in IOLt/2.
28 ± 0.
23 D in AK preoperatively and significantly (p < 0.
01/p < 0.
001) reduced to 0.
80 ± 0.
17 D in IOLt/1.
13 ± 0.
07 D in AK.
The pre‐operative and postoperative reduction in astigmatism between IOLt (0.
93 ± 0.
32 D) and AK (1.
15 ± 0.
21) was not significantly (p = 0.
56) different.
However, anterior corneal astigmatism (CAant) were 1.
99 ± 0.
21 D in IOLt/1.
95 ± 0.
23 in AK preoperatively and not significantly/significantly (p = 0.
36/p < 0.
05) reduced to 1.
73 ± 0.
18 D in IOLt/1.
10 ± 0.
18 D in AK.
Regarding CAant, the pre‐operative and postoperative reduction in astigmatism between IOLt (0.
36 ± 0.
25 D) and AK (0.
69 ± 0.
21 D) was not significantly (p = 0.
3) different.
Pre‐FSACS IOLt total corneal HOAs (0.
47 ± 0.
15) decreased, but not significantly, after FSACS IOLt (0.
41 ± 0.
11; p = 0.
76).
However, pre‐FSACS AK total corneal HOAs (0.
19 ± 0.
02) significantly increased after FSACS AK (0.
29 ± 0.
03; p < 0.
01).
Furthermore, the pre‐operative and postoperative changes in total corneal HOAs between IOLt (‐0.
06 ± 0.
04) and AK (0.
10 ± 0.
02 D) were significantly (p < 0.
01) different.
Best corrected visual acuity (Snellen E) was preoperatively 0.
42 ± 0.
02 in IOLt/0.
38 ± 0.
02 in AK and significantly (p < 0.
001) increased to 0.
82 ± 0.
06 in IOLt/0.
74 ± 0.
07 in AK postoperatively.
The preoperative and postoperative BCVA alteration was not significant between two groups (IOLt vs AK: 0.
40 ± 0.
04 vs 0.
36 ± 0.
07; p = 0.
64).
Conclusions: IOLt implantation efficient and harmless for correcting preoperative astigmatism in FSACS in a short period.

Related Results

Femtosecond laser assisted phacoemulsification plus IOL implant: toric IOL vs. astigmatic keratotomy
Femtosecond laser assisted phacoemulsification plus IOL implant: toric IOL vs. astigmatic keratotomy
Purpose To compare the clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FSLACS) with astigmatic keratotomy (AK) versus t...
Symmetrical femtosecond laser arc incision in correcting corneal astigmatism in cataract patients
Symmetrical femtosecond laser arc incision in correcting corneal astigmatism in cataract patients
AIM: To evaluate the effect of symmetrical arc incision correcting corneal astigmatism in femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification (FLACS). METHODS: This study enrolled patie...
Comparison of Toric Intraocular Lens Calculations Between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL
Comparison of Toric Intraocular Lens Calculations Between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL
Purpose: To compare toric IOL (Intra Ocular Lenses) suggestions for power, toric, and IOL alignment between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL (Axial Length). Methods: This single-...
Intraocular lens tilt and decentration in congenital ectopia lentis: baseline characteristics and first-year report
Intraocular lens tilt and decentration in congenital ectopia lentis: baseline characteristics and first-year report
AIM: To investigate the characteristics and associated factors of intraocular lens (IOL) tilt and decentration after transscleral suture-fixated IOL surgery in congenital ectopia l...
Comparative estimation of toric intraocular lenses optic power calculation acurary
Comparative estimation of toric intraocular lenses optic power calculation acurary
Purpose. To assess the refractive error of toric IOL calculation using Holladay IOL Consultant program with Holladay II formula, Verion navigation system using Holladay II and Barr...
EFFECT OF SUPEROTEMPORAL CLEAR CORNEAL INCISION ON PRE EXISTING ASTIGMATISM AFTER PHACOEMUSIFICATION SURGERY
EFFECT OF SUPEROTEMPORAL CLEAR CORNEAL INCISION ON PRE EXISTING ASTIGMATISM AFTER PHACOEMUSIFICATION SURGERY
Background: Historically, patients undergoing cataract surgery were at an increased risk of developing surgically induced astigmatism with the advent of modern methods of cataract ...
Management of Corneal Astigmatism by Limbal Relaxing Incisions during Phacoemulsification
Management of Corneal Astigmatism by Limbal Relaxing Incisions during Phacoemulsification
Background: Phacoemulsification is one of the most successfully and commonly performed cataract surgeries worldwide. Modern cataract and refractive surgery aims not only to improve...

Back to Top