Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Hitler's Policy Towards Iraq 1933-1945
View through CrossRef
This study demonstrates the Germany's policy towards Iraq after the arrival of the Nazis to power in 1933 till the end of World War II. Because of the geopolitical importance of Iraq, and specifically after its independence and its entry into the League of Nations in 1932, the international parties became in a struggle to dominate Iraq in particular, and the Middle East in general. The study aimed to shed light on Hitler's policy of dominating the Western influence in Iraq, occupying new areas in order to penetrate his power and control, and in his desire to acquire Europe, he was striking the influence of his enemies, especially Britain. The study identified a problem that was based on Germany's betting on time as a significant factor, and how it could be used to serve its strategic plan, taking into account Britain's pressure and its interests in Iraq. The study came out with many conclusions, the most important of which is Germany's growing role to find a foothold in the Middle East, as well as the poor strategic planning of Germany since it did not have any clear goals in that region. In addition, its policy was a reflection of the plans of its allies. The structure of the study was divided into an introduction, and three axes: first, German-Iraqi relations 1919-1939; second, World War II and the Iraqi stance of it it; third, May’s movement 1941 and the German attitude of it, finally, the Conclusion which included the most important findings and recommendations, namely: 1- The growing role of Germany to find a foothold In the Middle East after it achieving its national unity in 1870. However, the German penetration in Iraq was not easy as it was interrupted by many challenges caused by the major countries, particularly Britain. 2- the Germanic strategic planning in the Middle East was poor because it did not have clear goals in the region. Its movements there came as if they were only a reaction to the Allied plans and the depletion of Britain's power. 3- Germany's defeat in the First World War made it interested in restoring its position in Europe and improving its internal conditions, which led to the decline of its international relations with other countries, including Iraq. 4- The developments in Iraq in 1941 provided a valuable opportunity for Germany, but its military failure in its war operations affected its political activities in Iraq to the extent that it ended the German role in Iraq. 5- Germany’s failures began in the last years of the war that reached its climax in 1943, signaling the end of Germany’s aspirations in the East in general and Iraq in particular. Hence, an important stage of the German activities had ended in which Iraq was an arena for conflict between Britain and Germany.
Title: Hitler's Policy Towards Iraq 1933-1945
Description:
This study demonstrates the Germany's policy towards Iraq after the arrival of the Nazis to power in 1933 till the end of World War II.
Because of the geopolitical importance of Iraq, and specifically after its independence and its entry into the League of Nations in 1932, the international parties became in a struggle to dominate Iraq in particular, and the Middle East in general.
The study aimed to shed light on Hitler's policy of dominating the Western influence in Iraq, occupying new areas in order to penetrate his power and control, and in his desire to acquire Europe, he was striking the influence of his enemies, especially Britain.
The study identified a problem that was based on Germany's betting on time as a significant factor, and how it could be used to serve its strategic plan, taking into account Britain's pressure and its interests in Iraq.
The study came out with many conclusions, the most important of which is Germany's growing role to find a foothold in the Middle East, as well as the poor strategic planning of Germany since it did not have any clear goals in that region.
In addition, its policy was a reflection of the plans of its allies.
The structure of the study was divided into an introduction, and three axes: first, German-Iraqi relations 1919-1939; second, World War II and the Iraqi stance of it it; third, May’s movement 1941 and the German attitude of it, finally, the Conclusion which included the most important findings and recommendations, namely: 1- The growing role of Germany to find a foothold In the Middle East after it achieving its national unity in 1870.
However, the German penetration in Iraq was not easy as it was interrupted by many challenges caused by the major countries, particularly Britain.
2- the Germanic strategic planning in the Middle East was poor because it did not have clear goals in the region.
Its movements there came as if they were only a reaction to the Allied plans and the depletion of Britain's power.
3- Germany's defeat in the First World War made it interested in restoring its position in Europe and improving its internal conditions, which led to the decline of its international relations with other countries, including Iraq.
4- The developments in Iraq in 1941 provided a valuable opportunity for Germany, but its military failure in its war operations affected its political activities in Iraq to the extent that it ended the German role in Iraq.
5- Germany’s failures began in the last years of the war that reached its climax in 1943, signaling the end of Germany’s aspirations in the East in general and Iraq in particular.
Hence, an important stage of the German activities had ended in which Iraq was an arena for conflict between Britain and Germany.
Related Results
Hitler-biografie en psychologische duiding: evolutie en problemen van een discipline
Hitler-biografie en psychologische duiding: evolutie en problemen van een discipline
With the revival of the Hitler biography, an evaluation is appropriate of the way Hitler's personality is treated in recent historical research. This essay firstly discusses the wa...
PRECONDITIONS AND CAUSES OF THE MARCH 2003 US INVASION OF IRAQ
PRECONDITIONS AND CAUSES OF THE MARCH 2003 US INVASION OF IRAQ
This article analyzes the preconditions and causes of the U.S. invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The author examines the policies of the administrations of G. H. W. Bush (1989–1993) ...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...
U.S. Role in the Formation of the New Government in Iraq (April 2003 – June 2006)
U.S. Role in the Formation of the New Government in Iraq (April 2003 – June 2006)
Relevance. In contemporary academic and sociopolitical discourse, debates concerning the approaches of the foreign policy of the U.S. remain highly relevant. Both at the internatio...
Intelligence and Decision in 1938
Intelligence and Decision in 1938
Abstract
This chapter explores Hitler’s and Chamberlain’s decisions to negotiate Czechoslovakia’s fate rather than fight for it, comparing their decision-making at c...
The Belt-Road Initiative and prospects, Iraq as a model -Strategic Vision
The Belt-Road Initiative and prospects, Iraq as a model -Strategic Vision
The Chinese Belt and Road initiative is a revival of the idea of the ancient Silk Road, which dates back to the second century BC, and was a network of roads traveled by caravans...
Iraq-US Relations, 1920–2003
Iraq-US Relations, 1920–2003
Abstract
Oil played a central role in shaping US policy toward Iraq over the course of the 20th century. The United States first became involved in Iraq in the 19...

