Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

HSE Auditing

View through CrossRef
Shell companies have their own separate identity. In this paper the collective expressions 'Shell' and 'Group' and 'Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies' may be used for convenience where reference is made to the companies of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group in general Those expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies. Abstract Shell International Exploration and Production (SIEP) commenced a programme of Health Safety and Environmental (HSE) auditing in its Operating Companies (Opcos) in the late 1970s. Audits in the initial years focused on safety aspects with environmental and occupational aspects being introduced as the process matured. Part of the audit programme is performed by SIEP auditors, external to the Opcos. The level of SIEP-led audit activity increased linearly until the late 1980s, since when a level of around 40 audits per year has been maintained in roughly as many companies. For the last 15 years each annual programme has included structured audits of all facets of EP operations. The frequency and duration of these audits have the principle objective of auditing all HSE critical processes of each Opco's activity, within each five-year cycle. Durations vary from 8-10 days with a 4 person team to 18-20 days with a 6-8 person team. Each audit returns a satisfactory or unsatisfactory rating based on analysis of the effectiveness of the so-called eleven principles of Enhanced Safety Management (ESM) required to be applied throughout the Group. Independence is maintained by the SIEP audit leader, who carries ultimate responsibility for the content and wording of each report, where necessary backed-up by senior management in SIEP. These SIEP-led audits have been successful in the following areas:–Provision of early warning in areas where facilities' integrity or HSE management was likely to be compromised.–Aiding the establishment of an internal HSE auditing process in many Opcos.–Training, through participation in audits, not only auditors, but also prospective line managers m the effective management of HSE. With the recent introduction of HSE Management Systems (HSE-MS) in many Opcos, auditing is now in the process of controlled evolution from ESM to HSE-MS based. The evolutionary process includes restructuring the standard report contents list and questionnaires, reviewing the rating methodology and the production of revised guidelines. Full HSE-MS based auditing, scheduled to be achieved by end 1997, is expected to lead to further improvement and structure in Opco internal auditing, with an eventual reduction in the need for audits led by SIEP staff. The ultimate level of SIEP-led auditing has not been established and will depend on the achievements by, and confidence in, the Opcos. Introduction SIEP activities are conducted in 37 countries around the world through the Opcos. Each Opco is individually responsible for its business, but SIEP seeks through its policy, which requires foremost attention for health and safety of employees and other persons, and conservation of the environment, the implementation of common standards by the Opcos, where possible. P. 389
Title: HSE Auditing
Description:
Shell companies have their own separate identity.
In this paper the collective expressions 'Shell' and 'Group' and 'Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies' may be used for convenience where reference is made to the companies of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group in general Those expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies.
Abstract Shell International Exploration and Production (SIEP) commenced a programme of Health Safety and Environmental (HSE) auditing in its Operating Companies (Opcos) in the late 1970s.
Audits in the initial years focused on safety aspects with environmental and occupational aspects being introduced as the process matured.
Part of the audit programme is performed by SIEP auditors, external to the Opcos.
The level of SIEP-led audit activity increased linearly until the late 1980s, since when a level of around 40 audits per year has been maintained in roughly as many companies.
For the last 15 years each annual programme has included structured audits of all facets of EP operations.
The frequency and duration of these audits have the principle objective of auditing all HSE critical processes of each Opco's activity, within each five-year cycle.
Durations vary from 8-10 days with a 4 person team to 18-20 days with a 6-8 person team.
Each audit returns a satisfactory or unsatisfactory rating based on analysis of the effectiveness of the so-called eleven principles of Enhanced Safety Management (ESM) required to be applied throughout the Group.
Independence is maintained by the SIEP audit leader, who carries ultimate responsibility for the content and wording of each report, where necessary backed-up by senior management in SIEP.
These SIEP-led audits have been successful in the following areas:–Provision of early warning in areas where facilities' integrity or HSE management was likely to be compromised.
–Aiding the establishment of an internal HSE auditing process in many Opcos.
–Training, through participation in audits, not only auditors, but also prospective line managers m the effective management of HSE.
With the recent introduction of HSE Management Systems (HSE-MS) in many Opcos, auditing is now in the process of controlled evolution from ESM to HSE-MS based.
The evolutionary process includes restructuring the standard report contents list and questionnaires, reviewing the rating methodology and the production of revised guidelines.
Full HSE-MS based auditing, scheduled to be achieved by end 1997, is expected to lead to further improvement and structure in Opco internal auditing, with an eventual reduction in the need for audits led by SIEP staff.
The ultimate level of SIEP-led auditing has not been established and will depend on the achievements by, and confidence in, the Opcos.
Introduction SIEP activities are conducted in 37 countries around the world through the Opcos.
Each Opco is individually responsible for its business, but SIEP seeks through its policy, which requires foremost attention for health and safety of employees and other persons, and conservation of the environment, the implementation of common standards by the Opcos, where possible.
P.
389.

Related Results

HSE Culture as a Panacea to redefining HSE Excellence and Sustaining HSE Best practices
HSE Culture as a Panacea to redefining HSE Excellence and Sustaining HSE Best practices
Abstract The paper is a follow-up in achieving HSE excellence through institutionalizing HSE. Several tools are used in achieving HSE excellence but HSE culture has ...
Upstream Hearts and Minds Program – at Malaysia's Asset Sabah Assets Experiences
Upstream Hearts and Minds Program – at Malaysia's Asset Sabah Assets Experiences
Abstract Addressing behavior safety concerns by Oil and Gas players have always been a paramount agenda in the industry, with rampant HSE management system developme...
HSE Rig Ranking Measuring What Matters
HSE Rig Ranking Measuring What Matters
Abstract Measuring HSE performance is vital when dealing with the implementation and execution of multiple Drilling Contractor HSE programs to ensure expectations ar...
Evolution of HSE and Future Challenges in the E&P Sector of Pakistan
Evolution of HSE and Future Challenges in the E&P Sector of Pakistan
Abstract Objectives/Scope: Evolution of HSE in the E&P Sector of Pakistan during past few decades has touched maturity stage after passing various...
Quantifying HSE Culture – A Leading Indicator of HSE Performance: An Energy Industry Case Study
Quantifying HSE Culture – A Leading Indicator of HSE Performance: An Energy Industry Case Study
Abstract This paper presents the results of an HSE Culture survey administered to employees and managers at an energy company. HSE culture can be defined as the valu...
Key Initiatives towards HSE Excellence
Key Initiatives towards HSE Excellence
Abstract Description This paper describes key initiatives of the HSE management system that has been developed, and implementati...
Improving HSE Performance by Management of Human Factors
Improving HSE Performance by Management of Human Factors
Abstract Management of human factors is recognized as an essential role in the control of risk. Human factors cover a wide range of issues, which include the percept...
Nurture the Culture; HSE Culture Improvement Program
Nurture the Culture; HSE Culture Improvement Program
Abstract All organizations’ ultimate goal is "Zero Accident" and to achieve this target in our organization also, a benchmarking study on HSE KPIs, and deep analysis...

Back to Top