Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Berkeley and Leibniz

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter explores the relationship between the views of Leibniz and Berkeley on the fundamental nature of the created universe. It argues that Leibniz concurs with Berkeley on three key points: that in the final analysis there are only perceivers and their contents (subjective idealism), that there are strictly speaking no material or corporeal substances, and that bodies or sensible things reduce to the contents of perceivers (phenomenalism). It then reconstructs Leibniz’s central argument for phenomenalism, which rests on his belief in the infinite division of matter, his doctrine of the ideality of relations, and the traditional principle that being and unity convert. Finally, it explores Leibniz’s belief that a body having its being in one perceiver can be “founded” on other perceivers, and considers Berkeley’s reasons for opposing such a view.
Title: Berkeley and Leibniz
Description:
Abstract This chapter explores the relationship between the views of Leibniz and Berkeley on the fundamental nature of the created universe.
It argues that Leibniz concurs with Berkeley on three key points: that in the final analysis there are only perceivers and their contents (subjective idealism), that there are strictly speaking no material or corporeal substances, and that bodies or sensible things reduce to the contents of perceivers (phenomenalism).
It then reconstructs Leibniz’s central argument for phenomenalism, which rests on his belief in the infinite division of matter, his doctrine of the ideality of relations, and the traditional principle that being and unity convert.
Finally, it explores Leibniz’s belief that a body having its being in one perceiver can be “founded” on other perceivers, and considers Berkeley’s reasons for opposing such a view.

Related Results

A Metaphysics for the Mob
A Metaphysics for the Mob
AbstractGeorge Berkeley notoriously claimed that his immaterialist metaphysics was not only consistent with common sense, but that it was also integral to its defense. This book ar...
Tensor products of Leibniz bimodules and Grothendieck rings
Tensor products of Leibniz bimodules and Grothendieck rings
In this paper we define three different notions of tensor products for Leibniz bimodules. The ``natural" tensor product of Leibniz bimodules is not always a Leibniz bimodu...
Berkeley and Sensible Things
Berkeley and Sensible Things
This paper aims to re-reading Berkeley and reposition his philosophy of knowledge between the claims of adherents of idealism or immaterialism that so far have been labeled by inte...
Berkeley and Reid
Berkeley and Reid
Abstract Reid reacted strongly to Berkeley’s philosophy. He depicts Berkeley as the exemplar of the theory on which ideas are the immediate objects of mental activit...
Hubert Dreyfus ( 1929-2017), Raymond Smullyan (1919-2017) y el Sueño de Leibniz (1646-1716)
Hubert Dreyfus ( 1929-2017), Raymond Smullyan (1919-2017) y el Sueño de Leibniz (1646-1716)
Resumen. Dos filósofos recientemente fallecidos, Hubert L. Dreyfus yRaymond Smullyan, analizan las ideas de G.W. Leibniz sobre sistemasformales y máquinas lógicas. Dreyfus reconoce...
Berkeley and Kant
Berkeley and Kant
Abstract This chapter surveys some of the most important issues concerning Kant’s relation to Berkeley. Early critics of the first edition of Critique of Pure Reason...
WHITEHEAD, BERKELEY, AND REALISM
WHITEHEAD, BERKELEY, AND REALISM
This paper examines the shifting interpretations of George Berkeley’s philosophy in early 20th-century British realism, contrasting the Cantabrigian reading of Moore and Russell wi...
Symmetric Hom–Leibniz algebras
Symmetric Hom–Leibniz algebras
Abstract This paper focuses on quadratic Hom–Leibniz algebras, defined as (left or right) Hom–Leibniz algebras equipped with symmetric, non-degenerate, and invariant bilinear fo...

Back to Top