Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Metaphysics for the Mob

View through CrossRef
AbstractGeorge Berkeley notoriously claimed that his immaterialist metaphysics was not only consistent with common sense, but that it was also integral to its defense. This book argues that understanding the basic connection between Berkeley's philosophy and common sense requires a better understanding of the four principle components of Berkeley's positive metaphysics: the nature of being, the divine language thesis, the active/passive distinction, and the nature of spirits. This book begins by focusing on Berkeley's view of the nature of being. It elucidates Berkeley's view on Locke and the Cartesians, and examines Berkeley's views about related concepts such as unity and simplicity. From there, it moves on to Berkeley's philosophy of language, arguing that scrutiny of the famous Introduction to the Principles of Human Knowledge reveals that Berkeley identified the ideational theory of meaning and understanding as the root cause of some of the worst of humanity's intellectual errors, not abstract ideas. Abstract ideas are, rather, the most debilitating symptom of this underlying ailment. In place of the ideational theory, Berkeley defends a rudimentary use theory of meaning. This understanding of Berkeley's approach to semantics is then applied to the divine language thesis and is shown to have important consequences for Berkeley's pragmatic approach to the ontology of natural objects and for his approach to our knowledge of, and relation to, other minds, including God's. Turning next to Berkeley's much maligned account of spirits, the book defends the coherence of Berkeley's view of spirits by way of providing an interpretation of the active/passive distinction as marking a normative distinction and by focusing on the role that divine language plays in letting Berkeley identify the soul with the will. With these four principles of Berkeley's philosophy in hand, the book returns to the topic of common sense and offers a defense of Berkeley's philosophy as built upon, and expressive of, the deepest metaphysical commitments of mainstream Christianity.
Oxford University PressNew York
Title: A Metaphysics for the Mob
Description:
AbstractGeorge Berkeley notoriously claimed that his immaterialist metaphysics was not only consistent with common sense, but that it was also integral to its defense.
This book argues that understanding the basic connection between Berkeley's philosophy and common sense requires a better understanding of the four principle components of Berkeley's positive metaphysics: the nature of being, the divine language thesis, the active/passive distinction, and the nature of spirits.
This book begins by focusing on Berkeley's view of the nature of being.
It elucidates Berkeley's view on Locke and the Cartesians, and examines Berkeley's views about related concepts such as unity and simplicity.
From there, it moves on to Berkeley's philosophy of language, arguing that scrutiny of the famous Introduction to the Principles of Human Knowledge reveals that Berkeley identified the ideational theory of meaning and understanding as the root cause of some of the worst of humanity's intellectual errors, not abstract ideas.
Abstract ideas are, rather, the most debilitating symptom of this underlying ailment.
In place of the ideational theory, Berkeley defends a rudimentary use theory of meaning.
This understanding of Berkeley's approach to semantics is then applied to the divine language thesis and is shown to have important consequences for Berkeley's pragmatic approach to the ontology of natural objects and for his approach to our knowledge of, and relation to, other minds, including God's.
Turning next to Berkeley's much maligned account of spirits, the book defends the coherence of Berkeley's view of spirits by way of providing an interpretation of the active/passive distinction as marking a normative distinction and by focusing on the role that divine language plays in letting Berkeley identify the soul with the will.
With these four principles of Berkeley's philosophy in hand, the book returns to the topic of common sense and offers a defense of Berkeley's philosophy as built upon, and expressive of, the deepest metaphysical commitments of mainstream Christianity.

Related Results

Mob Lynching in India: An Analytical Study
Mob Lynching in India: An Analytical Study
In our nation, the prioritisation of the safety and protection of cows often seems to surpass that of women. The escalating occurrences of mob lynching under the guise of cow prote...
Mob Lynching in India: An Exploratory Study with Special Reference to India
Mob Lynching in India: An Exploratory Study with Special Reference to India
Mob lynching is the act of individuals disregarding legal procedures to enforce their distorted concept of justice, which frequently leads to the violent murder of others and a gra...
Interface Between Metaphysics and Science
Interface Between Metaphysics and Science
The interface between metaphysics and science refers to the close-knit relationship between Metaphysics as First Philosophy and science. The first conception of metaphysics by Aris...
Metaphysics
Metaphysics
AbstractThis chapter introduces some central issues and themes in feminist philosophical engagements with metaphysics. It provides an outline of what feminist metaphysics typically...
Contemporary Metaphysics
Contemporary Metaphysics
There is no general agreement or consensus about how to define metaphysics. The word itself derives from the title of one of Aristotle’s books, one that deals with decidedly metaph...
Kavramsal Putperestlik ve Felsefe-Jean-Luc Marion Felsefesine Bir Giriş
Kavramsal Putperestlik ve Felsefe-Jean-Luc Marion Felsefesine Bir Giriş
Conceptual Idolatry and Philosophy -An Introduction to the Philosophy of Jean-Luc Marion-rnJean-Luc Marion, regarded as one of the most important representatives of contemporary Fr...
Newcastle's Mob
Newcastle's Mob
“I love a mob,” the aging Duke of Newcastle said in 1768, “I headed a mob once myself. We owe the Hanoverian succession to a mob.” As I read those words I wondered if the good Duke...
Common Sense, the Manifest Image, and Immaterialism
Common Sense, the Manifest Image, and Immaterialism
Abstract With an interpretation of Berkeley's view of spirits in hand, this chapter turns to the task of situating that view of spirits within his overall positive m...

Back to Top