Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS LIGNOCAINE WITH COMPOUND LIDOCAINE/PRILOCAINE CREAM IN PREVENTING POST EXTUBATION COUGH IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA FOR LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL
View through CrossRef
Background Post-extubation cough is a frequent complication following general anaesthesia, occurring in up to 60% of patients and often leading to discomfort, delayed recovery, and postoperative complications such as wound disruption or cardiovascular stress. Strategies including intravenous lignocaine and topical anaesthetics have been employed to mitigate this complication, yet their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. Given the clinical impact of airway irritation on patient recovery, identifying the most effective preventive measure is essential.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of intravenous lignocaine with topical compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream in reducing the incidence of post-extubation cough in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesia, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, over six months. Seventy-two patients aged 18–60 years, classified as ASA I–II, and scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups using computer-generated randomization. Group A received intravenous lignocaine 2% at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg 1.5 minutes before extubation, while Group B had 2 g lidocaine/prilocaine cream (5%) applied evenly on the endotracheal tube cuff at intubation. Standardized anaesthesia protocols were followed. The primary outcome was the absence of post-extubation cough observed within two hours postoperatively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, with chi-square tests applied for group comparisons, considering p ≤ 0.05 statistically significant.
Results: Efficacy in preventing post-extubation cough was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A (66.7% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed superior outcomes in Group B among females (71.4% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.008), ASA I patients (57.1% vs. 42.9%), ASA II patients (80.0% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.05), patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m² (65.6% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.006), and surgeries lasting <90 minutes (61.5% vs. 38.5%, p = 0.03).
Conclusion: Topical lidocaine/prilocaine cream demonstrated superior efficacy compared with intravenous lignocaine in preventing post-extubation cough, offering a simple and effective intervention to improve patient comfort and postoperative recovery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Health and Research Insights
Title: COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS LIGNOCAINE WITH COMPOUND LIDOCAINE/PRILOCAINE CREAM IN PREVENTING POST EXTUBATION COUGH IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA FOR LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL
Description:
Background Post-extubation cough is a frequent complication following general anaesthesia, occurring in up to 60% of patients and often leading to discomfort, delayed recovery, and postoperative complications such as wound disruption or cardiovascular stress.
Strategies including intravenous lignocaine and topical anaesthetics have been employed to mitigate this complication, yet their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain.
Given the clinical impact of airway irritation on patient recovery, identifying the most effective preventive measure is essential.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of intravenous lignocaine with topical compound lidocaine/prilocaine cream in reducing the incidence of post-extubation cough in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesia, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, over six months.
Seventy-two patients aged 18–60 years, classified as ASA I–II, and scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups using computer-generated randomization.
Group A received intravenous lignocaine 2% at a dose of 1.
5 mg/kg 1.
5 minutes before extubation, while Group B had 2 g lidocaine/prilocaine cream (5%) applied evenly on the endotracheal tube cuff at intubation.
Standardized anaesthesia protocols were followed.
The primary outcome was the absence of post-extubation cough observed within two hours postoperatively.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, with chi-square tests applied for group comparisons, considering p ≤ 0.
05 statistically significant.
Results: Efficacy in preventing post-extubation cough was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A (66.
7% vs.
38.
9%, p = 0.
01).
Subgroup analysis showed superior outcomes in Group B among females (71.
4% vs.
28.
6%, p = 0.
008), ASA I patients (57.
1% vs.
42.
9%), ASA II patients (80.
0% vs.
20.
0%, p = 0.
05), patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m² (65.
6% vs.
34.
4%, p = 0.
006), and surgeries lasting <90 minutes (61.
5% vs.
38.
5%, p = 0.
03).
Conclusion: Topical lidocaine/prilocaine cream demonstrated superior efficacy compared with intravenous lignocaine in preventing post-extubation cough, offering a simple and effective intervention to improve patient comfort and postoperative recovery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Related Results
2% lidocaine versus 3% prilocaine for oral and maxillofacial surgery
2% lidocaine versus 3% prilocaine for oral and maxillofacial surgery
Objective:
To investigate the speed of action and injection discomfort of 2% lidocaine and 3% prilocaine for upper teeth extractions.
...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Harfaoui W, Alilou M, El Adib AR, Zidouh S, Zentar A, Lekehal B, et al. Patient Safety in Anesthesiology: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects. Cureus. 2024 Sep; 16(9). doi: 10.7759...
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
Abstract
Background/purpose
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures. Difficult laparoscopi...
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
Objectives: Toevaluate the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared with open cholecystectomy in compensated cirrhotic patients. Study Design: Prospective randomized stu...
Effectiveness and Safety of Extubation before Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade versus Traditional Technique in Providing Smooth Extubation
Effectiveness and Safety of Extubation before Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade versus Traditional Technique in Providing Smooth Extubation
Background:
Traditional extubation often leads to bucking, coughing, and undesirable hemodynamic changes. Extubation just before administering reversal could re...
Predictive factors of extubation failure in pediatric cardiac intensive care unit: A single-center retrospective study from Thailand
Predictive factors of extubation failure in pediatric cardiac intensive care unit: A single-center retrospective study from Thailand
Introduction/objectiveExtubation failure increases morbidity and mortality in pediatric cardiac patients, a unique population including those with congenital heart disease or acqui...
Study About the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Lignocaine on Hemodynamic and Recovery Responses During Tracheal Extubation
Study About the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Lignocaine on Hemodynamic and Recovery Responses During Tracheal Extubation
Introduction: During tracheal extubation, hemodynamic fluctuations can occur, such as increased heart rate and blood pressure, potentially causing adverse events. Dexmedetomidine a...

