Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;

View through CrossRef
Objectives: Toevaluate the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared with open cholecystectomy in compensated cirrhotic patients. Study Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Department of Surgery, Liaquat University Hospital, Jamshoro. Liaquat University Hospital is Tertiary Care Hospital in the region of Hyderabad and Jamshoro. Period: Three years from January 2011 to December 2014. Patients and Method: Total 172 patients presentedwithsymptomatic gall stone disease and compensated cirrhosis were randomly divided in to two groups, open cholecystectomy group and laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. Study variables were age, sex, cause of cirrhosis, surgical time, blood loss during and after surgery, hospital stay and postoperative complications. After inform consent, data was collected on preformed proforma. For statically analysis SPSS 16 were used, statically significance were defined a P value < 0.05. Results: In patients for open cholecystectomy group cirrhosis was developed due to secondary infection hepatitis C in 56 (65.88%), hepatitis B in 21 (24.70%) and hepatitis B & C in 08 (9.42%). In laparoscopic cholecystectomy group patients cirrhosis was developed due secondary infection with hepatitis C in 62 (71.26%), hepatitis B in 15 (17.24%) and hepatitis B & C in 10 (11.5%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done on 79 (90.80%) and eight (9.20%) patients converted in to open cholecystectomy due to difficult dissection in three patients and bleeding  developed into five patients. The time of surgery was shorter in laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (60.15±15 min) as compared to 75.10±15 minutes in open cholecystectomy group. Oral diet was started early (08-18H) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to open cholecystectomy (24-12) hours. Hospital stay was also shorter in laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (1.5±1) days versus 03±01 day in open cholecystectomy group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe, more feasible, needless operative time and less postoperative complicationsin compensated cirrhotic patient as compare to open cholecystectomy but laparoscopic cholecystectomy needs more expertise and availability of instruments.
Title: LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
Description:
Objectives: Toevaluate the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared with open cholecystectomy in compensated cirrhotic patients.
Study Design: Prospective randomized study.
Setting: Department of Surgery, Liaquat University Hospital, Jamshoro.
Liaquat University Hospital is Tertiary Care Hospital in the region of Hyderabad and Jamshoro.
Period: Three years from January 2011 to December 2014.
Patients and Method: Total 172 patients presentedwithsymptomatic gall stone disease and compensated cirrhosis were randomly divided in to two groups, open cholecystectomy group and laparoscopic cholecystectomy group.
Study variables were age, sex, cause of cirrhosis, surgical time, blood loss during and after surgery, hospital stay and postoperative complications.
After inform consent, data was collected on preformed proforma.
For statically analysis SPSS 16 were used, statically significance were defined a P value < 0.
05.
Results: In patients for open cholecystectomy group cirrhosis was developed due to secondary infection hepatitis C in 56 (65.
88%), hepatitis B in 21 (24.
70%) and hepatitis B & C in 08 (9.
42%).
In laparoscopic cholecystectomy group patients cirrhosis was developed due secondary infection with hepatitis C in 62 (71.
26%), hepatitis B in 15 (17.
24%) and hepatitis B & C in 10 (11.
5%).
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done on 79 (90.
80%) and eight (9.
20%) patients converted in to open cholecystectomy due to difficult dissection in three patients and bleeding  developed into five patients.
The time of surgery was shorter in laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (60.
15±15 min) as compared to 75.
10±15 minutes in open cholecystectomy group.
Oral diet was started early (08-18H) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to open cholecystectomy (24-12) hours.
Hospital stay was also shorter in laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (1.
5±1) days versus 03±01 day in open cholecystectomy group.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe, more feasible, needless operative time and less postoperative complicationsin compensated cirrhotic patient as compare to open cholecystectomy but laparoscopic cholecystectomy needs more expertise and availability of instruments.

Related Results

The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
Abstract Background/purpose Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures. Difficult laparoscopi...
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Background and Aim:Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) continue to be a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The prevalence of iatrogenic IBDI increased with the laparosc...
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Background:  The purpose of the present study was to examine the current approach and different strategies adopted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany.Methods:  A retrospec...
Proinflammatory cytokines in open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Proinflammatory cytokines in open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a minimal access surgery, is fast replacing open cholecystectomy and is being associated with less trauma. The objective of this study was ...
Frequency of Common Bile Duct Injury in Open Cholecystectomy versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Frequency of Common Bile Duct Injury in Open Cholecystectomy versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has replaced open cholecystectomy as the standard treatment for cholelithiasis. However, it is associated with a higher incidence of common...
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Background: Acute cholecystitis, which is typically associated with gallstones, is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen presenting in emergency departments around the wor...

Back to Top