Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Differential Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Added to Bupivacaine: A Comparative Study
View through CrossRef
Background: Intrathecal adjuvants are commonly used to enhance the efficacy of spinal anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, and fentanyl, an opioid, have shown benefits in prolonging sensory and motor blockade when added to bupivacaine. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective lower limb or lower abdominal surgeries. Methods: Seventy patients aged 18–65 years, classified as ASA I or II, were randomly assigned into two groups of 35 each. Group D received 3 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine + 5 µg dexmedetomidine, while Group F received 3 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine + 25 µg fentanyl intrathecally. Parameters assessed included onset and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic changes, postoperative analgesia, and side effects. Results: The onset of sensory and motor block was faster in Group D (sensory: 3.2 ± 0.6 min vs. 4.1 ± 0.7 min, p < 0.05; motor: 4.5 ± 0.8 min vs. 5.6 ± 0.9 min, p < 0.05). Duration of sensory block was longer in Group D (190 ± 25 min) compared to Group F (150 ± 20 min, p < 0.01). Postoperative analgesia was prolonged in Group D (mean analgesia: 240 ± 30 min vs. 180 ± 25 min, p < 0.01). Hemodynamic parameters were comparable, with mild bradycardia in 2 patients in Group D. No major adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine provides faster onset, longer duration of sensory and motor block, and prolonged postoperative analgesia compared to fentanyl, with minimal side effects. Dexmedetomidine is an effective alternative to fentanyl for spinal anesthesia.
Title: Differential Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Added to Bupivacaine: A Comparative Study
Description:
Background: Intrathecal adjuvants are commonly used to enhance the efficacy of spinal anesthesia.
Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, and fentanyl, an opioid, have shown benefits in prolonging sensory and motor blockade when added to bupivacaine.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective lower limb or lower abdominal surgeries.
Methods: Seventy patients aged 18–65 years, classified as ASA I or II, were randomly assigned into two groups of 35 each.
Group D received 3 mL of 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine + 5 µg dexmedetomidine, while Group F received 3 mL of 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine + 25 µg fentanyl intrathecally.
Parameters assessed included onset and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic changes, postoperative analgesia, and side effects.
Results: The onset of sensory and motor block was faster in Group D (sensory: 3.
2 ± 0.
6 min vs.
4.
1 ± 0.
7 min, p < 0.
05; motor: 4.
5 ± 0.
8 min vs.
5.
6 ± 0.
9 min, p < 0.
05).
Duration of sensory block was longer in Group D (190 ± 25 min) compared to Group F (150 ± 20 min, p < 0.
01).
Postoperative analgesia was prolonged in Group D (mean analgesia: 240 ± 30 min vs.
180 ± 25 min, p < 0.
01).
Hemodynamic parameters were comparable, with mild bradycardia in 2 patients in Group D.
No major adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine provides faster onset, longer duration of sensory and motor block, and prolonged postoperative analgesia compared to fentanyl, with minimal side effects.
Dexmedetomidine is an effective alternative to fentanyl for spinal anesthesia.
Related Results
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
Background: Various intrathecal additives are added to local anesthetics to increase the speed of onset, improve the quality, and prolong the
inuence of spinal anesthesia. Midazol...
Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery
Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery
Background: In this study, we have compared the addition of fentanyl 25 mcg and dexmedetomidine 5 mcg to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia separately for p...
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives
Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Nalbuphine versus Intrathecal Fentanyl as Adjuvant to 0.5% Bupivacaine for Cesarian Section under Spinal Anaesthesia
Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Nalbuphine versus Intrathecal Fentanyl as Adjuvant to 0.5% Bupivacaine for Cesarian Section under Spinal Anaesthesia
Abstract
Background
One of the main objectives of anesthesia is to alleviate the patient’s pain and agony, by ensuring the perfo...
COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS FENTANYL AS ADJUVANTS TO BUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY
COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS FENTANYL AS ADJUVANTS TO BUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY
Background:The supraclavicular approach to blockage of nerves around the brachial plexus is a commonly used technique for upper extremity surgical procedures. The performanc...
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Background & objectives: The anesthetists have been trying various adjuvants with local anesthetic agents for spinal anesthesia to prolong the duration of analgesia and to redu...
EFFECT OF INTRATHECAL HEAVY BUPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND INTRATHECAL HEAVY BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL IN LOWER ABDOMINAL AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERIES
EFFECT OF INTRATHECAL HEAVY BUPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND INTRATHECAL HEAVY BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL IN LOWER ABDOMINAL AND GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERIES
Objective: Spinal or epidural anesthesia techniques provide the best method of anesthesia for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. Small doses of adjuvants administered spinal...
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
Background: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is increasingly being used in various surgical procedures due to its safety and effectiveness. Tympanoplasty, a common otological proced...

