Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

EXPLORING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN USING METADISCOURSE FOR POLITICAL OPINION WRITING

View through CrossRef
Background and Purpose: Metadiscourse marker is one of the most commonly-used linguistic devices in persuasive writing, and it shapes writer’s arguments to the needs and expectations of the target readers. Research has consistently shown that women, on average, are less politically interested, informed, and efficacious than men. However, this does not necessarily imply that male columnists are more persuasive than female columnists when writing political opinion articles. Hence, the present study aims to investigate how male and female columnists use metadiscourse markers in political opinion writing to effectively direct their political views toward their readers.   Methodology: This descriptive study used frequency analysis, comparative analysis, and a semi-structured interview with eight ardent readers to examine metadiscourse markers used by male and female columnists in their political opinion articles, as well as the impact of persuasion on their readers. 100 opinion articles about Malaysia's 14th general election were chosen from two English-language online newspaper portals in Malaysia, The Star and the New Straits Times.   Findings: The findings revealed that female columnists employed more metadiscourse markers than male columnists. Respondents concluded that articles with more metadiscourse markers used in the text, particularly in the interpersonal category, appeared to be more persuasive. Furthermore, the findings indicated that female columnists presented a more convincing image than those produced by male columnists.   Contributions: As research conducted on gender differences in political writing is still rare, this research provided information regarding gender preferences in using metadiscourse markers in political opinion articles. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by informing researchers and opinion writers about the many types of metadiscourse markers that may be used to establish rapport between writers and readers.   Keywords: Metadiscourse markers, persuasive writing, gender, male, female, political-opinion articles.   Cite as: Ramash, N. S., & Ng, L. S. (2023). Exploring gender differences in using metadiscourse for political opinion writing. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(1), 333-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp333-356
Title: EXPLORING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN USING METADISCOURSE FOR POLITICAL OPINION WRITING
Description:
Background and Purpose: Metadiscourse marker is one of the most commonly-used linguistic devices in persuasive writing, and it shapes writer’s arguments to the needs and expectations of the target readers.
Research has consistently shown that women, on average, are less politically interested, informed, and efficacious than men.
However, this does not necessarily imply that male columnists are more persuasive than female columnists when writing political opinion articles.
Hence, the present study aims to investigate how male and female columnists use metadiscourse markers in political opinion writing to effectively direct their political views toward their readers.
  Methodology: This descriptive study used frequency analysis, comparative analysis, and a semi-structured interview with eight ardent readers to examine metadiscourse markers used by male and female columnists in their political opinion articles, as well as the impact of persuasion on their readers.
100 opinion articles about Malaysia's 14th general election were chosen from two English-language online newspaper portals in Malaysia, The Star and the New Straits Times.
  Findings: The findings revealed that female columnists employed more metadiscourse markers than male columnists.
Respondents concluded that articles with more metadiscourse markers used in the text, particularly in the interpersonal category, appeared to be more persuasive.
Furthermore, the findings indicated that female columnists presented a more convincing image than those produced by male columnists.
  Contributions: As research conducted on gender differences in political writing is still rare, this research provided information regarding gender preferences in using metadiscourse markers in political opinion articles.
This study contributes to the body of knowledge by informing researchers and opinion writers about the many types of metadiscourse markers that may be used to establish rapport between writers and readers.
  Keywords: Metadiscourse markers, persuasive writing, gender, male, female, political-opinion articles.
  Cite as: Ramash, N.
S.
, & Ng, L.
S.
(2023).
Exploring gender differences in using metadiscourse for political opinion writing.
Journal of Nusantara Studies, 8(1), 333-356.
http://dx.
doi.
org/10.
24200/jonus.
vol8iss1pp333-356.

Related Results

Metadiscourse in postgraduate writing
Metadiscourse in postgraduate writing
<p>This thesis investigates metadiscourse in master’s theses and the relationship between metadiscourse frequencies and quality of thesis writing. Metadiscourse has been a ma...
Reflexive Metadiscourse in Online Academic Discussion Forums
Reflexive Metadiscourse in Online Academic Discussion Forums
<p><strong>This study investigates metadiscourse use in online academic discussion forums with the use of Ӓdel’s reflexive model. Metadiscourse markers are linguistic f...
Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the “Monash Life” Magazine
Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the “Monash Life” Magazine
Metadiscourse is a new concept of analyzing the discourse related to the relationship between the writer and reader. This can be the way of communicating used by writer to reader. ...
Metadiscourse in Motion: Tracing Diachronic Variations in Pakistani Academic Writing Across Disciplines
Metadiscourse in Motion: Tracing Diachronic Variations in Pakistani Academic Writing Across Disciplines
Metadiscourse analysis holds great significance as it provides a way to discover the rhetorical patterns of the text. It is the way in which the language is used by a speaker or wr...
An investigation into the use of metadiscourse in undergraduates’ abstracts in social sciences
An investigation into the use of metadiscourse in undergraduates’ abstracts in social sciences
Abstract There is very little research on the use of metadiscourse markers in abstracts across different disciplines (especially in a single study) in the researc...
Metadiscourse Markers in Master Thesis Abstracts of American and Iraqi English Theses
Metadiscourse Markers in Master Thesis Abstracts of American and Iraqi English Theses
The present study is intended to critically examine metadiscourse markers in 24 master thesis abstracts. Twelve of them are written by non-native Iraqi female students and the rest...
The Taken-for-Granted Role of Metadiscourse in Teaching Reading: Iranian EFL Learners’ Achilles Heel
The Taken-for-Granted Role of Metadiscourse in Teaching Reading: Iranian EFL Learners’ Achilles Heel
As a feature of text and talk, metadiscourse refers to how authors structure their writing so that readers can make sense of the text in greater depth. In navigating the process of...
Exploring Language Features of Male and Female Speakers in Pakistani TEDx Talks: A Corpus-based Comparative Analysis
Exploring Language Features of Male and Female Speakers in Pakistani TEDx Talks: A Corpus-based Comparative Analysis
The study explores the linguistic patterns in Pakistani TEDx Talks. It is based on gender-based language use. It consists of ten talks selected from YouTube and applies both quanti...

Back to Top