Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Quine, Structure, and Ontology

View through CrossRef
Contemporary work on ontology, logic, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of science, and philosophy of language still owes much to W.V. Quine. Nevertheless his views are now often dismissed because of mistaken or overly simplified conceptions of his philosophy. The development of his views over time are often overlooked, and in particular the growing importance of a kind of structuralism to his system as it evolved. This volume provides a fuller, richer picture of Quine’s views and their development. It is the first to investigate Quine’s views on structure and how it permeates and shapes his attitude to a range of philosophical questions. It includes contributions by world-famous philosophers and experts in a range of subfields including philosophical logic, philosophy of language, history of philosophy, mathematics, philosophy of time, and set theory. Chapters by Michael Resnik, Frederique Janssen-Lauret and Fraser MacBride, John Collins, Jaroslav Peregrin, and Paul Gregory explore whether Quine’s structuralism is epistemological, language-based, or ontological. Greg Frost-Arnold, Robert Sinclair, and Gary Kemp and Andrew Lugg explore Quine’s views on structure from a historical point of view. Nathan Salmón, Gila Sher, Marianna Antonutti Marfori, and Natalja Deng consider Quine’s views on the structure of logic, language, and theories in relation to contemporary philosophy, specifically ontology, the philosophy of logic and mathematics, philosophy of set theory, and philosophy of time.
Oxford University Press
Title: Quine, Structure, and Ontology
Description:
Contemporary work on ontology, logic, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of science, and philosophy of language still owes much to W.
V.
Quine.
Nevertheless his views are now often dismissed because of mistaken or overly simplified conceptions of his philosophy.
The development of his views over time are often overlooked, and in particular the growing importance of a kind of structuralism to his system as it evolved.
This volume provides a fuller, richer picture of Quine’s views and their development.
It is the first to investigate Quine’s views on structure and how it permeates and shapes his attitude to a range of philosophical questions.
It includes contributions by world-famous philosophers and experts in a range of subfields including philosophical logic, philosophy of language, history of philosophy, mathematics, philosophy of time, and set theory.
Chapters by Michael Resnik, Frederique Janssen-Lauret and Fraser MacBride, John Collins, Jaroslav Peregrin, and Paul Gregory explore whether Quine’s structuralism is epistemological, language-based, or ontological.
Greg Frost-Arnold, Robert Sinclair, and Gary Kemp and Andrew Lugg explore Quine’s views on structure from a historical point of view.
Nathan Salmón, Gila Sher, Marianna Antonutti Marfori, and Natalja Deng consider Quine’s views on the structure of logic, language, and theories in relation to contemporary philosophy, specifically ontology, the philosophy of logic and mathematics, philosophy of set theory, and philosophy of time.

Related Results

Quine y la ontología
Quine y la ontología
Resumen La ontología jugó un rol muy amplio en la filosofía de Quine y fue una de sus mayores preocupaciones desde el inicio de los años 30 hasta el final de su vida. Su trabajo s...
Lewis and Quine in context
Lewis and Quine in context
Abstract Robert Sinclair’s Quine, Conceptual Pragmatism, and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction persu...
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1908–2000)
Quine, Willard Van Orman (1908–2000)
Quine is the foremost representative of naturalism in the second half of the twentieth century. His naturalism consists of an insistence upon a close connection or alliance between...
Naturalizing Russell
Naturalizing Russell
Abstract This chapter examines Bertrand Russell’s influence on W. V. Quine, specifically through the three areas of logic, ontology, and epistemology. These three...
Quine vs. Quine
Quine vs. Quine
How does Quine fare in the first decades of the twenty-first century? This chapter examines a cluster of Quinean theses that are especially fruitful in meeting some of the current ...
Introduction
Introduction
This introduction discusses the development of Quine’s system over time and the centrality of structure to it. It explains the contributions made in this volume to our understandin...
Quine’s Deflationary Structuralism
Quine’s Deflationary Structuralism
W. V. Quine undermined and rejected Rudolf Carnap’s metaphysical deflationism, reinstating scientific metaphysics. Despite this, Quine eventually develops his own brand of structur...
Quine's Scientific Realism Revisited
Quine's Scientific Realism Revisited
AbstractIn order to reconnect Quine's views to the current debate on scientific realism, I reframe Quine's scientific realism into a semantic, a metaphysical, and an epistemologica...

Back to Top