Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Section 1981 as Contract Law

View through CrossRef
<p><span>A civil rights secret hides in plain sight: a federal antidiscrimination statute, 42 U.S.C. §&nbsp;1981, is a foundational part of contract law in the United States. Originating in the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Section 1981 prohibits racially discriminatory formation, performance, modification, termination, and enforcement of contracts. The statute thus forbids parties from racially discriminating in nearly every phase of every contractual relationship.</span><span>&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span>Despite Section 1981’s evident concern for contracts, comprehensive summaries of contract law—including Restatements, treatises, and casebooks—usually ignore the statute. This omission might make sense if Section 1981 does not count as contract law, a tempting view given its status as federal antidiscrimination law. But this Article argues that—for conceptual and normative reasons—Section 1981 already counts as part of contract law and should be recognized as such. The statute also expresses an important part of contract law because, apart from aspiring to guarantee equal citizenship regardless of race, the statute governs nearly every aspect of every contract—indeed, every attempted contract—in the United States.</span></p> <p><span>These claims have far-reaching theoretical and practical implications. Contract law theories must account for the possibility that antidiscrimination rules reinforce contract law’s most basic values rather than thwarting them. Practically, editors of treatises and other comprehensive doctrinal summaries should include some non-trivial discussion of Section 1981’s origins and contemporary applications. Applying doctrines like good faith and fair dealing will require assessing whether contracts are performed without racial discrimination.&nbsp;And law professors should consider modifying their syllabi to include Section 1981 in their courses on contract law.</span></p> <p><span>Contract law needs antidiscrimination law to realize its basic values including economic freedom and minimally respectful commercial exchange. Rather than undermining contractual freedoms, sound antidiscrimination laws like Section 1981 play an essential role in facilitating them. So, the possibility that some antidiscrimination rules form part of contract law should come as no surprise.</span></p>
Elsevier BV
Title: Section 1981 as Contract Law
Description:
<p><span>A civil rights secret hides in plain sight: a federal antidiscrimination statute, 42 U.
S.
C.
§&nbsp;1981, is a foundational part of contract law in the United States.
Originating in the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Section 1981 prohibits racially discriminatory formation, performance, modification, termination, and enforcement of contracts.
The statute thus forbids parties from racially discriminating in nearly every phase of every contractual relationship.
</span><span>&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span>Despite Section 1981’s evident concern for contracts, comprehensive summaries of contract law—including Restatements, treatises, and casebooks—usually ignore the statute.
This omission might make sense if Section 1981 does not count as contract law, a tempting view given its status as federal antidiscrimination law.
But this Article argues that—for conceptual and normative reasons—Section 1981 already counts as part of contract law and should be recognized as such.
The statute also expresses an important part of contract law because, apart from aspiring to guarantee equal citizenship regardless of race, the statute governs nearly every aspect of every contract—indeed, every attempted contract—in the United States.
</span></p> <p><span>These claims have far-reaching theoretical and practical implications.
Contract law theories must account for the possibility that antidiscrimination rules reinforce contract law’s most basic values rather than thwarting them.
Practically, editors of treatises and other comprehensive doctrinal summaries should include some non-trivial discussion of Section 1981’s origins and contemporary applications.
Applying doctrines like good faith and fair dealing will require assessing whether contracts are performed without racial discrimination.
&nbsp;And law professors should consider modifying their syllabi to include Section 1981 in their courses on contract law.
</span></p> <p><span>Contract law needs antidiscrimination law to realize its basic values including economic freedom and minimally respectful commercial exchange.
Rather than undermining contractual freedoms, sound antidiscrimination laws like Section 1981 play an essential role in facilitating them.
So, the possibility that some antidiscrimination rules form part of contract law should come as no surprise.
</span></p>.

Related Results

The impact of organic rice contract farming on farmers' livelihood and land tenure in Cambodia : a case study in Kampong Speu province
The impact of organic rice contract farming on farmers' livelihood and land tenure in Cambodia : a case study in Kampong Speu province
This study examines organic rice contract farming in Cambodia and its impact on farmers‟ livelihood and land tenure. The study‟s objective is to gain a better insight of the terms ...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Privity in e-Contract in Nigeria
Privity in e-Contract in Nigeria
The doctrine of privity of contract excludes a third party to a contract from claiming a right under a contract between specific parties that have voluntarily entered into the cont...
Perbandingan Fiqh Tentang Akad Tidak Bernama
Perbandingan Fiqh Tentang Akad Tidak Bernama
Abstract This paper uses a type of qualitative research with a library research focus. The discussion of this paper, first discusses the meaning of contract in a comparative ...
Pluralism
Pluralism
The chapter first identifies the two leading monist theories of contract and illustrates their deficits. Autonomy-based accounts that explain contract law as a vindication of promi...
International arbitration contract principles: analysis of Middle East perceptions
International arbitration contract principles: analysis of Middle East perceptions
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the main contract principles which govern the international arbitration contract with special emphasis to examine contract principle ...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...

Back to Top