Javascript must be enabled to continue!
International arbitration contract principles: analysis of Middle East perceptions
View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the main contract principles which govern the international arbitration contract with special emphasis to examine contract principle found of the Middle East, how international principles of contract are perceived in the region, and whether there are any dominant contract principles.Design/methodology/approachA general exploratory research procedure used to give a better grasp of various aspects of socio‐legal approaches. The paper seeks to create knowledge that can be used to retrieve some pressing social and organisational understanding in the said region. The first part of the paper examines the role of ethics and tradition in understanding Middle Eastern contract principles. The second part examines the impact of Islamic Law on commercial contract principles. The third section analyses the regional perception of international contract principles. Finally, the paper addresses some contemporary issues of international contracts in the Middle East.FindingsThe paper showed that the legal perceptions of international contract principles reflect regional legal thinking which has been influenced by a mixed understanding of regional traditions, Islamic contract law principles as well as Western contract principles when these principles match regional legal culture. Overall, it showed that still under such mixed understanding, there are strong regional legal traditions and these are found in Islamic contract principles and affects commercial contract experiences. In general, a significant difference still exists between modern international contract principles and those in the Middle East.Practical implicationsThe paper generates a knowledge that mixed understanding in regard to international contract arbitration principles due historical and cultural reasoning. Arab States does not share common understanding of international contract principles. Thus, it is very superfluous to propose the argument that there is sole Middle Eastern regional perception which dominates every Arab State. Therefore, special understandings and considerations should be given to every international arbitration contract from certain Arab State entity to another.Originality/valueThe paper provides a clear understanding of the guidelines for international commercial arbitration contract in the Middle East. Legal culture should be taken into consideration if a successful contract implementation has to be achieved.
Title: International arbitration contract principles: analysis of Middle East perceptions
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the main contract principles which govern the international arbitration contract with special emphasis to examine contract principle found of the Middle East, how international principles of contract are perceived in the region, and whether there are any dominant contract principles.
Design/methodology/approachA general exploratory research procedure used to give a better grasp of various aspects of socio‐legal approaches.
The paper seeks to create knowledge that can be used to retrieve some pressing social and organisational understanding in the said region.
The first part of the paper examines the role of ethics and tradition in understanding Middle Eastern contract principles.
The second part examines the impact of Islamic Law on commercial contract principles.
The third section analyses the regional perception of international contract principles.
Finally, the paper addresses some contemporary issues of international contracts in the Middle East.
FindingsThe paper showed that the legal perceptions of international contract principles reflect regional legal thinking which has been influenced by a mixed understanding of regional traditions, Islamic contract law principles as well as Western contract principles when these principles match regional legal culture.
Overall, it showed that still under such mixed understanding, there are strong regional legal traditions and these are found in Islamic contract principles and affects commercial contract experiences.
In general, a significant difference still exists between modern international contract principles and those in the Middle East.
Practical implicationsThe paper generates a knowledge that mixed understanding in regard to international contract arbitration principles due historical and cultural reasoning.
Arab States does not share common understanding of international contract principles.
Thus, it is very superfluous to propose the argument that there is sole Middle Eastern regional perception which dominates every Arab State.
Therefore, special understandings and considerations should be given to every international arbitration contract from certain Arab State entity to another.
Originality/valueThe paper provides a clear understanding of the guidelines for international commercial arbitration contract in the Middle East.
Legal culture should be taken into consideration if a successful contract implementation has to be achieved.
Related Results
International Investment Arbitration
International Investment Arbitration
International investment arbitration is heterogeneous. At its core, it represents the settlement of international investment disputes between foreign investors and host States by a...
The genesis of the concept of international commercial arbitration
The genesis of the concept of international commercial arbitration
This article is dedicated to the study and disclosure of the legal essence of international commercial arbitration as a legal phenomenon representing an alternative method of resol...
The Arbitration Clause as Super Contract
The Arbitration Clause as Super Contract
It is widely acknowledged that the purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act was to place arbitration clauses on “equal footing” with other contracts. Nonetheless, federal and state c...
Offensive Arbitration
Offensive Arbitration
The standard critique of binding arbitration for consumer and employment disputes is that arbitration favors defendants. Arbitration often has reduced discovery, shortened statutes...
Building a Global International Arbitration Center of China: Independence, Internationalism and Immunity
Building a Global International Arbitration Center of China: Independence, Internationalism and Immunity
This paper explores contemporary issues and provides insights into arbitration as practiced in China’s cross border business and commercial domains. It employs a qualitative method...
The Mass Arbitration Illusion
The Mass Arbitration Illusion
Mass arbitration has emerged as the latest battleground in the ongoing tug-of-war between corporations and their consumers and employees regarding binding mandatory arbitration cla...
THE IMPORTANCE OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN WRITING: INTERNATIONAL, INDONESIA, AND NEW ZEALAND
THE IMPORTANCE OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT IN WRITING: INTERNATIONAL, INDONESIA, AND NEW ZEALAND
International commercial arbitration has been one of the popular means to solve a dispute, including in Indonesia and New Zealand. In the event the cross-border commercial parties ...
Azərbaycan Respublikasinda arbitraj mübahisələrin həllinin alternativ üsulu kimi
Azərbaycan Respublikasinda arbitraj mübahisələrin həllinin alternativ üsulu kimi
The article analyses in detail the recently adopted Law on Arbitration in the Republic of Azerbaijan, which was intended to replace the Law on International Arbitration. The Law se...

