Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Pluralism
View through CrossRef
The chapter first identifies the two leading monist theories of contract and illustrates their deficits. Autonomy-based accounts that explain contract law as a vindication of promise hold that contract law is designed either to support the practice of promise or to comply with its moral demands. Legal economic theories of contract imply that the rules of contract are or should be set to promote efficient transactions and to minimize litigation costs. I argue that these theories are not determinate in the way they aspire to be. Moreover, they depend on mistaken views both as to the relationship between contract law and relevant moral principles, and as to the kind of analytic order that contract theory can offer with respect to contract law.<br><br>The chapter next explores early pluralist theories, or 'structured pluralism", distinguishing between horizontal and vertical approaches. Horizontal pluralism holds that distinct features of contract law, such as the rules of interpretation, default rules, equitable remedies, legal damages or defenses are animated by distinct principles and normative commitments that balance each other out, albeit with residual tension among them. Vertical pluralism assigns sequential roles to different values, which appear at different “moments” in the justification of rules. In both types of structured pluralism, disparate values fit together to explain contract law but the picture so composed is stable and describes contract law in most liberal societies.<br> <br>The last part of the chapter discusses democratic pluralism, or more recent approaches to contract law that emphasize the link between pluralism as a feature of contract law and pluralism in the political communities governed by contract law. These theories regard pluralism about contract as a matter of legitimating contract and contract law as social instruments and coercive state action, respectively, in dynamic societies where people disagree about both what they owe each other and which obligations the state should enforce.
Title: Pluralism
Description:
The chapter first identifies the two leading monist theories of contract and illustrates their deficits.
Autonomy-based accounts that explain contract law as a vindication of promise hold that contract law is designed either to support the practice of promise or to comply with its moral demands.
Legal economic theories of contract imply that the rules of contract are or should be set to promote efficient transactions and to minimize litigation costs.
I argue that these theories are not determinate in the way they aspire to be.
Moreover, they depend on mistaken views both as to the relationship between contract law and relevant moral principles, and as to the kind of analytic order that contract theory can offer with respect to contract law.
<br><br>The chapter next explores early pluralist theories, or 'structured pluralism", distinguishing between horizontal and vertical approaches.
Horizontal pluralism holds that distinct features of contract law, such as the rules of interpretation, default rules, equitable remedies, legal damages or defenses are animated by distinct principles and normative commitments that balance each other out, albeit with residual tension among them.
Vertical pluralism assigns sequential roles to different values, which appear at different “moments” in the justification of rules.
In both types of structured pluralism, disparate values fit together to explain contract law but the picture so composed is stable and describes contract law in most liberal societies.
<br> <br>The last part of the chapter discusses democratic pluralism, or more recent approaches to contract law that emphasize the link between pluralism as a feature of contract law and pluralism in the political communities governed by contract law.
These theories regard pluralism about contract as a matter of legitimating contract and contract law as social instruments and coercive state action, respectively, in dynamic societies where people disagree about both what they owe each other and which obligations the state should enforce.
Related Results
Legal Pluralism
Legal Pluralism
Legal pluralism is a construct, a means of understanding and imagining the world, both positively (as it is) and normatively (as it ought to be). Originating from critiques of lega...
Cultural Pluralism and Communication
Cultural Pluralism and Communication
Cultural pluralism refers to conceptions of cultural heterogeneity, the term pluralism being understood in contrast to substance individualism. In general, pluralism denotes anti-m...
Religious Pluralism
Religious Pluralism
Within the philosophy of religion, theories of religious pluralism are models that provide a philosophical account of religious diversity. They are not descriptive theories of reli...
Value Pluralism and Legal Pluralism
Value Pluralism and Legal Pluralism
Abstract
In this chapter, the focus is on the question how different ideas of pluralism, legal pluralism, and value pluralism, relate. The background to the question...
Liberal Pluralism
Liberal Pluralism
Recalling J. S. Mill’s consciousness of the different goals of human life, the modern debate about pluralism has gathered momentum in liberal philosophy largely as a consequence of...
Pluralism in Islamic Law and Its Implications for Contemporary Islamic Education
Pluralism in Islamic Law and Its Implications for Contemporary Islamic Education
Objective: To analyze the view of Islamic law on pluralism and examine the strategy for the implementation of pluralism values in the world of Islamic education, especially in shap...
ISLAM DAN PLURALISME: KONSEP DAN STRATEGI IMPLEMENTASI DI PERSEKOLAHAN
ISLAM DAN PLURALISME: KONSEP DAN STRATEGI IMPLEMENTASI DI PERSEKOLAHAN
Islam is a holistic religion of public religion, and the closing religion that teaches divinity and humanity, including the problem of pluralism. The definition of pluralism in thi...
Religious Pluralism According to K.H. Abun Bunyamin in Tafsir Al-Ma'arif
Religious Pluralism According to K.H. Abun Bunyamin in Tafsir Al-Ma'arif
The pluralism of religion in Indonesia has always been a significant topic of debate, given the diversity of this country, consisting of various ethnicities, cultures, and religion...

