Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative Evaluation of Pre- and Postoperative Oswestry Disability Index in Lumbar Canal Stenosis, Instability, and Listhesis Following TLIF
View through CrossRef
Background: Lumbar degenerative pathologies such as canal stenosis, segmental instability, and listhesis are common causes of chronic back pain and disability. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) is a wellestablished surgical intervention for these conditions, offering decompression, stabilization, and alignment restoration. Functional assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is essential to gauge patient-reported outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare preoperative and postoperative ODI scores among patients with lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), LCS with instability, and listhesis undergoing TLIF using local corticocancellous bone grafts. Methods: A retro-prospective observational study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing TLIF at a tertiary center. Based on preoperative diagnosis, patients were categorized into three groups: LCS (n=44), LCS with instability (n=33), and listhesis (n=23). ODI scores were recorded preoperatively, on postoperative day 1, at 3 months, and at 1 year. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests and ANOVA. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Baseline ODI was highest in the LCS group (61.13 ± 5.81), followed by LCS with instability (60.09 ± 4.66), and listhesis (58.17 ± 4.77), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.0921). Postoperative ODI scores showed marked improvement across all groups. Day 1 scores were similar among groups (p=0.9092), while significant differences emerged at 3 months (p<0.0001) and 1 year (p<0.0001). Intragroup analysis revealed substantial reduction in ODI from baseline to 1 year (LCS: ↓52.04, Instability: ↓51.88, Listhesis: ↓50.56; p<0.0001). Conclusion: TLIF using corticocancellous bone grafts leads to significant and sustained reduction in disability across lumbar degenerative pathologies. Despite variation in baseline disability, all diagnostic groups experienced comparable postoperative functional gains, reinforcing TLIF's role as a versatile and effective surgical modality.
Dr. Yashwant Research Labs Pvt. Ltd.
Title: Comparative Evaluation of Pre- and Postoperative Oswestry Disability Index in Lumbar Canal Stenosis, Instability, and Listhesis Following TLIF
Description:
Background: Lumbar degenerative pathologies such as canal stenosis, segmental instability, and listhesis are common causes of chronic back pain and disability.
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) is a wellestablished surgical intervention for these conditions, offering decompression, stabilization, and alignment restoration.
Functional assessment using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is essential to gauge patient-reported outcomes.
Objective: This study aimed to compare preoperative and postoperative ODI scores among patients with lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), LCS with instability, and listhesis undergoing TLIF using local corticocancellous bone grafts.
Methods: A retro-prospective observational study was conducted on 100 patients undergoing TLIF at a tertiary center.
Based on preoperative diagnosis, patients were categorized into three groups: LCS (n=44), LCS with instability (n=33), and listhesis (n=23).
ODI scores were recorded preoperatively, on postoperative day 1, at 3 months, and at 1 year.
Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests and ANOVA.
A p-value < 0.
05 was considered significant.
Results: Baseline ODI was highest in the LCS group (61.
13 ± 5.
81), followed by LCS with instability (60.
09 ± 4.
66), and listhesis (58.
17 ± 4.
77), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.
0921).
Postoperative ODI scores showed marked improvement across all groups.
Day 1 scores were similar among groups (p=0.
9092), while significant differences emerged at 3 months (p<0.
0001) and 1 year (p<0.
0001).
Intragroup analysis revealed substantial reduction in ODI from baseline to 1 year (LCS: ↓52.
04, Instability: ↓51.
88, Listhesis: ↓50.
56; p<0.
0001).
Conclusion: TLIF using corticocancellous bone grafts leads to significant and sustained reduction in disability across lumbar degenerative pathologies.
Despite variation in baseline disability, all diagnostic groups experienced comparable postoperative functional gains, reinforcing TLIF's role as a versatile and effective surgical modality.
Related Results
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common causes of low back and leg pain. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration leads to the decrease of intervertebral height, the ...
Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Study Design.
A retrospective observational study.
Objective.
...
Low-grade spondylolisthesis: is transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion superior to posterolateral fusion
Low-grade spondylolisthesis: is transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion superior to posterolateral fusion
<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Spondylolisthesis is anterior translation of the cephalad vertebra relative to the adjacent caudal segment. Both ...
Lateral Fusion is a Unique Feature in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Lateral Fusion is a Unique Feature in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Study Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Objective
Limited clinical literature add...
Clinical Effectiveness and Biochemical Impacts of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-Analysis
Clinical Effectiveness and Biochemical Impacts of Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-Analysis
Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to assess and compare the clinical effectiveness, safety, and biochemical impacts of two spinal surgery techniques: open transforaminal lumbar i...
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in iatrogenic lumbar instability
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in iatrogenic lumbar instability
Background
Lumbosacral instability is one of the causes of failed back surgery syndrome, and it is characterized by loss of disc height with translational and in many c...
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Abstract
Background Purpose This retrospective study was applied to investigate the morphology characteristics of the spine and pelvis in patients with congenital spinal s...
Radiological and Functional Outcomes of Single vs. Multiple Level TLIF Using Local Corticocancellous Bone Grafts: A Retrospective-Prospective Study
Radiological and Functional Outcomes of Single vs. Multiple Level TLIF Using Local Corticocancellous Bone Grafts: A Retrospective-Prospective Study
Background: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a widely accepted surgical procedure for treating lumbar spinal instability and degenerative disorders. While interbody...

