Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
View through CrossRef
Study Design.
A retrospective observational study.
Objective.
This study investigated the clinical and radiological results of minimally invasive (MI)
versus
open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis over a 10-year period.
Summary of Background Data.
Few studies have compared 10-year follow-up outcomes between MI-TLIF and open TLIF.
Methods.
We retrospectively collected the outcome data of patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent TLIF procedures using an MI (
n
= 108) or open (
n
= 53) approach. Fifty-two (48%) and 31 (58%) patients in the MI-TLIF and open TLIF groups, respectively, completed the 10-year follow-up. A primary clinical outcome included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as well as visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain at baseline and at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. The radiographic fusion rate and incidence of secondary surgery due to adjacent segment disease were assessed at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively.
Results.
Intraoperative blood loss and length of hospitalization were significantly lower in the MI-TLIF group than in the open TLIF group. At 2 years postoperatively, the ODI and VAS scores for back and leg pain were significantly lower in the MI-TLIF group than in the open TLIF group. No significant differences were found in VAS scores for back and leg pain or ODI scores between the two groups at 10 years postoperatively. Radiographic fusion rates and prevalence of secondary surgery for adjacent segment disease were not significantly different between the groups at 10 years postoperatively.
Conclusion.
Efficacy of MI-TLIF for patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis is comparable to that of open TLIF over 10-years. However, MI-TLIF may have superior perioperative recovery and 2-year postoperative functional outcomes than open TLIF.
Level of Evidence:
3
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Description:
Study Design.
A retrospective observational study.
Objective.
This study investigated the clinical and radiological results of minimally invasive (MI)
versus
open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis over a 10-year period.
Summary of Background Data.
Few studies have compared 10-year follow-up outcomes between MI-TLIF and open TLIF.
Methods.
We retrospectively collected the outcome data of patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent TLIF procedures using an MI (
n
= 108) or open (
n
= 53) approach.
Fifty-two (48%) and 31 (58%) patients in the MI-TLIF and open TLIF groups, respectively, completed the 10-year follow-up.
A primary clinical outcome included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) as well as visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain at baseline and at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively.
The radiographic fusion rate and incidence of secondary surgery due to adjacent segment disease were assessed at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively.
Results.
Intraoperative blood loss and length of hospitalization were significantly lower in the MI-TLIF group than in the open TLIF group.
At 2 years postoperatively, the ODI and VAS scores for back and leg pain were significantly lower in the MI-TLIF group than in the open TLIF group.
No significant differences were found in VAS scores for back and leg pain or ODI scores between the two groups at 10 years postoperatively.
Radiographic fusion rates and prevalence of secondary surgery for adjacent segment disease were not significantly different between the groups at 10 years postoperatively.
Conclusion.
Efficacy of MI-TLIF for patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis is comparable to that of open TLIF over 10-years.
However, MI-TLIF may have superior perioperative recovery and 2-year postoperative functional outcomes than open TLIF.
Level of Evidence:
3.
Related Results
Philosophies and Surgical Techniques for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis Treatment with Literature Review
Philosophies and Surgical Techniques for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis Treatment with Literature Review
IntroductionHigh-grade spondylolisthesis is defined as cases with more than 50% displacement and spondylolisthesis with Meyerding grade III and higher. The surgical management of h...
Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
One of the most common surgical cures for lumbar degenerative illnesses is lumbar fusion. Traditional open lumbar fusion is often used in clinical settings and has positive clinica...
Determinants of lateral fusion in single-level oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis of fusion patterns and clinical outcomes
Determinants of lateral fusion in single-level oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis of fusion patterns and clinical outcomes
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Purpose: This study aimed to (1) determine the incidence of lateral fusion following single-level oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF); ...
OUTCOMES OF TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AND POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN MANAGING SINGLE-LEVEL LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
OUTCOMES OF TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AND POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN MANAGING SINGLE-LEVEL LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
Background: There is significant discussion over the most effective surgical approach for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis, despite the recommendation of a number of surgical appr...
Surgical Outcomes of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Surgical Outcomes of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Background: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) involves fusing vertebrae in the lower spine with bone grafts or cages to stabilize it. This surgical solution effectively addr...
Spine Open Journal Club: July 2026
Spine Open Journal Club: July 2026
In this journal club, we will discuss three of the most popular articles in the initial series of publications at Spine Open. The live discussion will take place on July 27, 2026 ...
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in iatrogenic lumbar instability
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in iatrogenic lumbar instability
Background
Lumbosacral instability is one of the causes of failed back surgery syndrome, and it is characterized by loss of disc height with translational and in many c...
Incidence of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis in Patients Candidate for Total Knee Replacement
Incidence of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis in Patients Candidate for Total Knee Replacement
Background: Lumbar spondylolisthesis and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are prevalent conditions in the elderly population.
The presence of lumbar spine complaints clearly exacerbates ov...

