Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Pemilu dan Pilkada: Antara Idealisme Konstitusi dan Praktik Politik Uang
View through CrossRef
The principle of popular sovereignty is a fundamental foundation of the Indonesian democratic system, as stated in Article 1, Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. Popular sovereignty emphasizes the importance of the people's right to choose and be chosen in general elections (Pemilu) and regional elections (Pilkada), which serve as the source of legitimacy for a legitimate government. This sovereignty should reflect democratic values that are just and equal. However, in practice, the implementation of popular sovereignty through elections is often tarnished by money politics, which threatens the integrity of democracy itself. This phenomenon indicates a profound distortion of democratic principles, where the election process is more driven by material interests than by political aspirations and ideologies. Money politics not only undermines the quality of elections but also diminishes public trust in the democratic process. This practice allows voters to sell their votes in exchange for money or goods, leading to electoral injustice. It transforms general elections and regional elections from an ideal democratic process into a contest reliant on financial resources, rather than on the quality of the leaders chosen. This article aims to analyze the contradiction between the constitutional ideal of popular sovereignty and the reality of money politics in the administration of general elections and regional elections. This study employs a normative juridical approach with qualitative analysis techniques to explore how current laws have guaranteed the implementation of popular sovereignty. The findings indicate that although the legal framework provides protection for the principle of popular sovereignty, weak law enforcement and the persistent transactional political culture hinder its substantial realization. As a solution, this article recommends several strategic steps, including strengthening regulations to limit money politics, reforming the party system to reduce the dominance of practical politics, and enhancing political education based on democratic values and integrity. With these measures, the principle of popular sovereignty can be more purely and consistently upheld, ultimately strengthening Indonesia’s democratic system to be fair and sustainable.
Title: Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Pemilu dan Pilkada: Antara Idealisme Konstitusi dan Praktik Politik Uang
Description:
The principle of popular sovereignty is a fundamental foundation of the Indonesian democratic system, as stated in Article 1, Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution.
Popular sovereignty emphasizes the importance of the people's right to choose and be chosen in general elections (Pemilu) and regional elections (Pilkada), which serve as the source of legitimacy for a legitimate government.
This sovereignty should reflect democratic values that are just and equal.
However, in practice, the implementation of popular sovereignty through elections is often tarnished by money politics, which threatens the integrity of democracy itself.
This phenomenon indicates a profound distortion of democratic principles, where the election process is more driven by material interests than by political aspirations and ideologies.
Money politics not only undermines the quality of elections but also diminishes public trust in the democratic process.
This practice allows voters to sell their votes in exchange for money or goods, leading to electoral injustice.
It transforms general elections and regional elections from an ideal democratic process into a contest reliant on financial resources, rather than on the quality of the leaders chosen.
This article aims to analyze the contradiction between the constitutional ideal of popular sovereignty and the reality of money politics in the administration of general elections and regional elections.
This study employs a normative juridical approach with qualitative analysis techniques to explore how current laws have guaranteed the implementation of popular sovereignty.
The findings indicate that although the legal framework provides protection for the principle of popular sovereignty, weak law enforcement and the persistent transactional political culture hinder its substantial realization.
As a solution, this article recommends several strategic steps, including strengthening regulations to limit money politics, reforming the party system to reduce the dominance of practical politics, and enhancing political education based on democratic values and integrity.
With these measures, the principle of popular sovereignty can be more purely and consistently upheld, ultimately strengthening Indonesia’s democratic system to be fair and sustainable.
Related Results
resume hukum tatanegara
resume hukum tatanegara
Resume partai politik dan pemilihan umum“Partai politik dan sistem pemilu” Partai politik dan sistem pemilu saling berkaitan satu sama lain. Partai politik tanpa sistem pemilu yang...
FUNGSI, MAKSUD, DAN NILAI-NILAI KONSTITUSI
FUNGSI, MAKSUD, DAN NILAI-NILAI KONSTITUSI
Konstitusi merupakan segala ketentuan dan aturan dasar mengenai ketatanegaraan. Berdirinya sebuah negara tidak lepas dari adanya konstitusi yang mendasarinya. Konstitusi dapat beru...
resume hukum tatanegara
resume hukum tatanegara
Resume Tentang Pemilihan Umum dan Partai Politik1. Pemilihan UmumPeluang dan tantangan pemilu serentak 2019 dalam perspektif politikINTISARIPemilihan Umum 2019 adalah pemilihan leg...
Reaktualisasi Pendidikan Politik dalam Menghadapi Politik Uang Melalui Gerakan Desa Anti Politik Uang
Reaktualisasi Pendidikan Politik dalam Menghadapi Politik Uang Melalui Gerakan Desa Anti Politik Uang
Pilkada di Indonesia masih menghadapi permasalahan besar terkait fenomena politik uang sehingga keberadaannya sulit dihentikan sehingga telah dibudayakan di masyarakat. Kajian ini ...
PENATAAN ULANG PEMILU PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024
PENATAAN ULANG PEMILU PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024
ABSTRACT
This article examines the redesign of national and regional elections after Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 from the perspective of Indonesian cons...
PROBLEMATIKA DAN STRATEGI PENANGANAN POLITIK UANG PEMILU SERENTAK 2019 DI INDONESIA
PROBLEMATIKA DAN STRATEGI PENANGANAN POLITIK UANG PEMILU SERENTAK 2019 DI INDONESIA
Pemilu serantak Tahun 2019 meninggalkan permasalahan akut yang berdampak pada kritisnya nilai demokrasi di Indonesia. Realitas menunjukan terdapat banyak pelanggaran yang menyumban...
Dinamika Perkembangan Demokrasi serta Problematikanya Pasca Reformasi
Dinamika Perkembangan Demokrasi serta Problematikanya Pasca Reformasi
Pasca reformasi 1998 mulai timbul kesadaran masyarakat agar pemerintah melangsungkan demokrasi berupa pemilihan umum dan Pilkada. Pemilihan umum dan Pilkada sebagai sarana menghila...
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
ABSTRACT
The Purpose of this Research is to examine 1) Legal construction of the Judicial Review of Parliamentary Threshold No. 44/PUUXV/2017 and No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024 on Judicial R...

