Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Functional Outcome After Modified Blair Tibiotalar Arthrodesis for Talar Osteonecrosis

View through CrossRef
Background: Osteonecrosis of the talar body is a challenging problem for both patient and surgeon. One reconstruction option is an arthrodesis of the tibia to the talar neck, as described by Blair, 2 which has the theoretical advantages of salvaging some hindfoot height and motion of the subtalar joint. A few case series have been published describing outcome after modified Blair fusions, none with validated functional outcomes. The purpose of this article is to describe a modification of Blair's original technique, and report the functional outcomes in a series of patients undergoing this procedure. Method: A retrospective review of seven patients with talar osteonecrosis undergoing modified Blair tibiotalar arthrodesis was performed. The median patient age was 51 (range, 39–78). Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 12–112). Two patients required a repeat procedure for delayed/nonunion, with subsequent uneventful union. In all patients the procedure included compression screw fixation of the talar head to the anterior distal tibia, with the two repeat procedures and the most recent patient having an additional anterior compression plate and bone graft. Functional outcome measures using both the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and the SF-36® global health outcome measure were obtained at latest follow-up. In addition, radiographic assessment of bone union and time to union was determined. Results: Median SF-36® physical and mental component scores were 46 and 61, respectively. The median AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 67 out of 100. Median visual analog scales for postoperative pain and function were 7.1 and 6.0 respectively, out of a best possible score of 10. Conclusion: Functional outcome scores after modified Blair arthrodesis are lower than similar scores after conventional tibiotalar fusion, and much lower than “normal” values; however, the procedure has similar, if not lower, complication rates to alternative complex hindfoot reconstructions, and this procedure is a valuable alternative in the management of talar osteonecrosis with arthrosis.
Title: Functional Outcome After Modified Blair Tibiotalar Arthrodesis for Talar Osteonecrosis
Description:
Background: Osteonecrosis of the talar body is a challenging problem for both patient and surgeon.
One reconstruction option is an arthrodesis of the tibia to the talar neck, as described by Blair, 2 which has the theoretical advantages of salvaging some hindfoot height and motion of the subtalar joint.
A few case series have been published describing outcome after modified Blair fusions, none with validated functional outcomes.
The purpose of this article is to describe a modification of Blair's original technique, and report the functional outcomes in a series of patients undergoing this procedure.
Method: A retrospective review of seven patients with talar osteonecrosis undergoing modified Blair tibiotalar arthrodesis was performed.
The median patient age was 51 (range, 39–78).
Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 12–112).
Two patients required a repeat procedure for delayed/nonunion, with subsequent uneventful union.
In all patients the procedure included compression screw fixation of the talar head to the anterior distal tibia, with the two repeat procedures and the most recent patient having an additional anterior compression plate and bone graft.
Functional outcome measures using both the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and the SF-36® global health outcome measure were obtained at latest follow-up.
In addition, radiographic assessment of bone union and time to union was determined.
Results: Median SF-36® physical and mental component scores were 46 and 61, respectively.
The median AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 67 out of 100.
Median visual analog scales for postoperative pain and function were 7.
1 and 6.
0 respectively, out of a best possible score of 10.
Conclusion: Functional outcome scores after modified Blair arthrodesis are lower than similar scores after conventional tibiotalar fusion, and much lower than “normal” values; however, the procedure has similar, if not lower, complication rates to alternative complex hindfoot reconstructions, and this procedure is a valuable alternative in the management of talar osteonecrosis with arthrosis.

Related Results

Asymptomatic Osteonecrosis of the Trochlea in an Adolescent: A Case Report
Asymptomatic Osteonecrosis of the Trochlea in an Adolescent: A Case Report
Abstract Introduction Osteonecrosis, also known as avascular necrosis, aseptic necrosis, or ischemic necrosis, results from a temporary or permanent halt in blood flow to a portion...
Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis through the Modified Steel Basket Technique in Foal
Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis through the Modified Steel Basket Technique in Foal
Background: The metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints are very demanded during high intensity exercises, and may be affected by osteoarthritis, fractures, luxations an...
Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Talus
Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Talus
➢ More than 60% of the talar surface area consists of articular cartilage, thereby limiting the possible locations for vascular infiltration and leaving the talus vulnerable to ost...
Does the Subtalar or Tibiotalar Joint Need Fused in Primary Retrograde Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing for Fragility Ankle Fractures?
Does the Subtalar or Tibiotalar Joint Need Fused in Primary Retrograde Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing for Fragility Ankle Fractures?
Background. As an alternative to traditional open reduction internal fixation of ankle fragility fractures, primary retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing has been investigate...
Arthrodesis or Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Meta-analysis
Arthrodesis or Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Lisfranc Injuries: A Meta-analysis
The purpose of this study is to determine if arthrodesis, compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), produces favorable American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ...
Joint‐Preserving Surgery for Talar Malunions or Nonuions
Joint‐Preserving Surgery for Talar Malunions or Nonuions
ObjectiveTo describe the technique and analyze the outcomes of joint‐preserving surgical treatments which included anatomical reconstruction or alignment correction for talar malun...
3D printing technology: Rethinking the approach to talar surgery; a literature review
3D printing technology: Rethinking the approach to talar surgery; a literature review
Talar fractures account for less than 1% of all fractures, yet despite this low occurrence they represent a major reconstruction challenge for surgeons. While total talar replaceme...

Back to Top