Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Joint‐Preserving Surgery for Talar Malunions or Nonuions
View through CrossRef
ObjectiveTo describe the technique and analyze the outcomes of joint‐preserving surgical treatments which included anatomical reconstruction or alignment correction for talar malunions or nonunions, and avoid development of degenerative changes in the adjacent joints.MethodsEight patients who had painful talar malunions or nonunions treated between 2009 and 2015 were included in this retrospective study. The mean age of the patients was 35.6 years, with patients aged from 18 to 58 years. Two patients had talar neck fractures and six had talar body fractures. According to a classification of post‐traumatic talar deformities, five patients were classified as type I (malunion and/or residual joint displacement), two as type II (nonunion with displacement), and one as type III (malunion with partial avascular necrosis [AVN]). Of these patients, six cases were treated with an osteotomy through the malunited fracture or removal of the pseudarthrosis, and two cases were corrected by supramalleolar or calcaneal osteotomies owing to complete disappearance of the former fracture lines. The follow‐up evaluation methods included the 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) score, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, range of motion (ROM), and radiological analysis. The differences between postoperative scores and preoperative scores were evaluated statistically with the paired Student's t‐test. Significance was assumed at P < 0.05.ResultsThe mean follow‐up time was 25.6 months. No wound healing problems or infections were observed. Solid union was obtained without redislocation in all cases, and with no signs of development or progression of AVN. At a mean of 25.6 months (range, 16–36 months) after reconstruction, all patients were satisfied with the result. The mean AOFAS score increased from 30.0 ± 7.0 pre‐operatively to 86.5 ± 7.8 post‐operatively (P < 0.001), the mean SF‐36 score increased from 38.8 ± 4.1 to 81.4 ± 7.7 (P < 0.001), and the average ROM (tibiotalar joint) increased from 40.5° ± 8.7° to 43.9° ± 7.2° (P < 0.05).DiscussionJoint‐preserving procedures for talar malunions or nonunions can bring about satisfactory outcomes, and the appropriate procedure should be adopted according to different types of post‐traumatic deformities.
Title: Joint‐Preserving Surgery for Talar Malunions or Nonuions
Description:
ObjectiveTo describe the technique and analyze the outcomes of joint‐preserving surgical treatments which included anatomical reconstruction or alignment correction for talar malunions or nonunions, and avoid development of degenerative changes in the adjacent joints.
MethodsEight patients who had painful talar malunions or nonunions treated between 2009 and 2015 were included in this retrospective study.
The mean age of the patients was 35.
6 years, with patients aged from 18 to 58 years.
Two patients had talar neck fractures and six had talar body fractures.
According to a classification of post‐traumatic talar deformities, five patients were classified as type I (malunion and/or residual joint displacement), two as type II (nonunion with displacement), and one as type III (malunion with partial avascular necrosis [AVN]).
Of these patients, six cases were treated with an osteotomy through the malunited fracture or removal of the pseudarthrosis, and two cases were corrected by supramalleolar or calcaneal osteotomies owing to complete disappearance of the former fracture lines.
The follow‐up evaluation methods included the 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) score, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, range of motion (ROM), and radiological analysis.
The differences between postoperative scores and preoperative scores were evaluated statistically with the paired Student's t‐test.
Significance was assumed at P < 0.
05.
ResultsThe mean follow‐up time was 25.
6 months.
No wound healing problems or infections were observed.
Solid union was obtained without redislocation in all cases, and with no signs of development or progression of AVN.
At a mean of 25.
6 months (range, 16–36 months) after reconstruction, all patients were satisfied with the result.
The mean AOFAS score increased from 30.
0 ± 7.
0 pre‐operatively to 86.
5 ± 7.
8 post‐operatively (P < 0.
001), the mean SF‐36 score increased from 38.
8 ± 4.
1 to 81.
4 ± 7.
7 (P < 0.
001), and the average ROM (tibiotalar joint) increased from 40.
5° ± 8.
7° to 43.
9° ± 7.
2° (P < 0.
05).
DiscussionJoint‐preserving procedures for talar malunions or nonunions can bring about satisfactory outcomes, and the appropriate procedure should be adopted according to different types of post‐traumatic deformities.
Related Results
High Rate of Talar Collapse in STAR Total Ankle
High Rate of Talar Collapse in STAR Total Ankle
Category:
Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Hindfoot
Introduction/Purpose:
Despite substanti...
Comparison of Outcomes of Arthroscopic Modified Broström Procedure for CLAI in Patients with Solitary ATFL Injury and in Patients with ATFL and CFL Complex Injury
Comparison of Outcomes of Arthroscopic Modified Broström Procedure for CLAI in Patients with Solitary ATFL Injury and in Patients with ATFL and CFL Complex Injury
Category:
Ankle; Arthroscopy
Introduction/Purpose:
ATFL (Anterior talofibular liga...
3D printing technology: Rethinking the approach to talar surgery; a literature review
3D printing technology: Rethinking the approach to talar surgery; a literature review
Talar fractures account for less than 1% of all fractures, yet despite this low occurrence they represent a major reconstruction challenge for surgeons. While total talar replaceme...
A lower talar tunnel placement is associated with postoperative recurrent sprain in CLAI patients following anatomic reconstruction
A lower talar tunnel placement is associated with postoperative recurrent sprain in CLAI patients following anatomic reconstruction
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate whether bone tunnel position is associated with postoperative recurrent sprain in chronic...
Reliability of the Anterior Drawer and Talar Tilt Tests Using the Ligmaster Joint Arthrometer
Reliability of the Anterior Drawer and Talar Tilt Tests Using the Ligmaster Joint Arthrometer
Context:Joint arthrometers have been developed to help determine the severity of ligament sprains.Objective:To establish intratester and intertester reliability of the talar invers...
Management of Concurrent Talar Body and Bimalleolar Fractures in Sagittal Plane: A Case Report
Management of Concurrent Talar Body and Bimalleolar Fractures in Sagittal Plane: A Case Report
Talar fractures are relatively uncommon, with an incidence of 0.1% to 0.85% of all fractures and 3% to 6% of all foot fractures. Among these, talar neck fractures are more common t...
Functional Outcome After Modified Blair Tibiotalar Arthrodesis for Talar Osteonecrosis
Functional Outcome After Modified Blair Tibiotalar Arthrodesis for Talar Osteonecrosis
Background: Osteonecrosis of the talar body is a challenging problem for both patient and surgeon. One reconstruction option is an arthrodesis of the tibia to the talar neck, as de...
Are Displaced Talar Neck Fractures Surgical Emergencies? A Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Experts
Are Displaced Talar Neck Fractures Surgical Emergencies? A Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Experts
Background: Displaced talar neck fractures are relatively rare injuries with potentially serious long-term morbidity. Expedient treatment has long been held as a treatment principl...

