Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Corneal densitometry analysis in patients diagnosed with keratoconus

View through CrossRef
AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study is to carry out a comparative study of corneal densitometry (COD) using Pentacam HR in two groups of patients. A control group of normal eyes where corneal pathology has been ruled out and another group of patients diagnosed with keratoconus (KC) who have not received corneal Cross‐Linking as treatment.MethodsThe sample consists of 30 eyes diagnosed with keratoconus compared to 30 eyes with normal corneas (N). The results are studied using Pentacam HR, which has a double Scheimpflug chamber. Patients are classified into 2 groups, ruling out corneal pathology in the control group. COD is measured in a 12mm diameter area, divided into concentric annular zones and different depths. COD is used to describe the characteristics of corneal tissue and makes it possible to quantify the degree of transparency of the corneal tissue.ResultsThere are significant differences between the groups after the COD examination. In the average of rings and total layers, an increase in total COD is observed in the eyes diagnosed with keratoconus compared to the normal ones (N = 15.71, KC = 21.05). When studied in layers, an increase in densitometry is also seen in the keratoconus group. The front layer (N = 21.61, KC = 29.13), the middle layer (N = 14.49, KC = 18.70) and the back layer (N = 11.04, KC = 14.57).ConclusionsThe corneal densitometry map shows total higher values in eyes with keratoconus compared to healthy eyes. The difference is most marked in the anterior layer of the cornea.References1. Maurice DM. The structure and transparency of the cornea. J Physiol. 1957;136:263–286.2. Shen Y, Han T, Jhanji V, Shang J, Zhao J, Li M, et al. Correlation between corneal topographic, densitometry, and biomechanical parameters in keratoconus eyes. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(3):12.3. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297–319.4. Lopes B, Ramos I, Ambrósio R Jr. Corneal densitometry in keratoconus. Cornea. 2014;33(12):1282–6.5. Koc M, Tekin K, Tekin MI, Uzel MM, Kosekahya P, Ozulken K, et al. An early finding of keratoconus: Increase in corneal densitometry: Increase in corneal densitometry. Cornea. 2018;37(5):580–6.
Title: Corneal densitometry analysis in patients diagnosed with keratoconus
Description:
AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study is to carry out a comparative study of corneal densitometry (COD) using Pentacam HR in two groups of patients.
A control group of normal eyes where corneal pathology has been ruled out and another group of patients diagnosed with keratoconus (KC) who have not received corneal Cross‐Linking as treatment.
MethodsThe sample consists of 30 eyes diagnosed with keratoconus compared to 30 eyes with normal corneas (N).
The results are studied using Pentacam HR, which has a double Scheimpflug chamber.
Patients are classified into 2 groups, ruling out corneal pathology in the control group.
COD is measured in a 12mm diameter area, divided into concentric annular zones and different depths.
COD is used to describe the characteristics of corneal tissue and makes it possible to quantify the degree of transparency of the corneal tissue.
ResultsThere are significant differences between the groups after the COD examination.
In the average of rings and total layers, an increase in total COD is observed in the eyes diagnosed with keratoconus compared to the normal ones (N = 15.
71, KC = 21.
05).
When studied in layers, an increase in densitometry is also seen in the keratoconus group.
The front layer (N = 21.
61, KC = 29.
13), the middle layer (N = 14.
49, KC = 18.
70) and the back layer (N = 11.
04, KC = 14.
57).
ConclusionsThe corneal densitometry map shows total higher values in eyes with keratoconus compared to healthy eyes.
The difference is most marked in the anterior layer of the cornea.
References1.
Maurice DM.
The structure and transparency of the cornea.
J Physiol.
1957;136:263–286.
2.
Shen Y, Han T, Jhanji V, Shang J, Zhao J, Li M, et al.
Correlation between corneal topographic, densitometry, and biomechanical parameters in keratoconus eyes.
Transl Vis Sci Technol.
2019;8(3):12.
3.
Rabinowitz YS.
Keratoconus.
Surv Ophthalmol.
1998;42(4):297–319.
4.
Lopes B, Ramos I, Ambrósio R Jr.
Corneal densitometry in keratoconus.
Cornea.
2014;33(12):1282–6.
5.
Koc M, Tekin K, Tekin MI, Uzel MM, Kosekahya P, Ozulken K, et al.
An early finding of keratoconus: Increase in corneal densitometry: Increase in corneal densitometry.
Cornea.
2018;37(5):580–6.

Related Results

Corneal densitometry changes in keratoconus patients after intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation
Corneal densitometry changes in keratoconus patients after intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation
BackgroundKeratoconus (KC) is an ectatic corneal disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning with myopic astigmatism. Intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) have been...
Diagnostic value of corneal optical densitometry in keratoconus
Diagnostic value of corneal optical densitometry in keratoconus
Abstract Purpose To investigate the clinical significance of the correlation between optical densitometry and both biomechanical and morphological parameters in keratoconu...
Corneal Scheimpflug Densitometry in Photorefractive Keratectomy Candidates
Corneal Scheimpflug Densitometry in Photorefractive Keratectomy Candidates
Purpose: To describe the normative data of corneal densitometry in photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) candidates by using a Scheimpflug camera. ...
Corneal Deformation Response in Patients With keratoconus and in Healthy Subjects
Corneal Deformation Response in Patients With keratoconus and in Healthy Subjects
Abstract Background To compare the corneal deformation response between patients with keratoconus and healthy subjects and to identify potential characteristics associated...
Comparative Analysis of Corneal Densitometry Changes Following Standard Versus Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Protocol
Comparative Analysis of Corneal Densitometry Changes Following Standard Versus Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Protocol
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare changes in corneal densitometry after standard (30 min exposure time of 3 mW/cm2 UVA) and accelerated (1...
Early changes in corneal densitometry after FS-LASIK combined with accelerated corneal cross-linking for correction of high myopia
Early changes in corneal densitometry after FS-LASIK combined with accelerated corneal cross-linking for correction of high myopia
AIM: To observe the effects of femtosecond laser-assisted excimer laser in situ keratomileusis combined with accelerated corneal cross-linking (FS-LASIK Xtra) on corneal densitomet...

Back to Top