Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Logical Fallacy Argumentation on Testimonials on Homeshopping Television Show

View through CrossRef
The decision to purchase a product is inseparable from the buyer's trust in a product. Testimonials are a tool for marketers to eliminate consumer barriers about the product to be purchased. Testimonials on home shopping television products tend to be controllable. The selection of sources, the use of scripts, and the editing process can be a form of media control over the information received by the public. This study focus on analyzing testimonials from the logical side of the testimony content. The method used to analyze this logical fallacy is qualitative content analysis. The text is separated using Toulmin's model into three parts, namely claim, ground, and warrant. This research uses a logical fallacy as a tool to evaluate the logic of the testimony in terms of content. The results of this study found that there was a logical fallacy in the testimony content. The fallacies include generalization fallacy, fallacy fallacies, fallacy of composition, appeal to wealth fallacy, appeal to pity, dan appeal to force.
Title: Logical Fallacy Argumentation on Testimonials on Homeshopping Television Show
Description:
The decision to purchase a product is inseparable from the buyer's trust in a product.
Testimonials are a tool for marketers to eliminate consumer barriers about the product to be purchased.
Testimonials on home shopping television products tend to be controllable.
The selection of sources, the use of scripts, and the editing process can be a form of media control over the information received by the public.
This study focus on analyzing testimonials from the logical side of the testimony content.
The method used to analyze this logical fallacy is qualitative content analysis.
The text is separated using Toulmin's model into three parts, namely claim, ground, and warrant.
This research uses a logical fallacy as a tool to evaluate the logic of the testimony in terms of content.
The results of this study found that there was a logical fallacy in the testimony content.
The fallacies include generalization fallacy, fallacy fallacies, fallacy of composition, appeal to wealth fallacy, appeal to pity, dan appeal to force.

Related Results

Rebooting Roseanne: Feminist Voice across Decades
Rebooting Roseanne: Feminist Voice across Decades
In recent years, the US television landscape has been flooded with reboots, remakes, and revivals of “classic” nineties television series, such as Full/er House (1987-1995, 2016-pr...
The gambler's fallacy fallacy (fallacy)
The gambler's fallacy fallacy (fallacy)
The gambler's fallacy is the irrational belief that prior outcomes in a series of events affect the probability of a future outcome, even though the events in question are independ...
LVIV TELEVISION: PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES
LVIV TELEVISION: PROBLEMS AND CHALLENGES
The study of the problems of Lviv television is important because Ukrainian television, in general, has repeatedly encountered a number of difficulties in the process of its activi...
Mindy Calling: Size, Beauty, Race in The Mindy Project
Mindy Calling: Size, Beauty, Race in The Mindy Project
When characters in the Fox Television sitcom The Mindy Project call Mindy Lahiri fat, Mindy sees it as a case of misidentification. She reminds the character that she is a “petite ...
İnternet Televizyonculuğuna Kuramsal Bir Yaklaşım
İnternet Televizyonculuğuna Kuramsal Bir Yaklaşım
The development of digital technologies has led to the integration of television and computer technologies. In this way, television broadcasts are not limited to television devices...
Argumentation In Flux (Modelling Change in the Theory of Argumentation)
Argumentation In Flux (Modelling Change in the Theory of Argumentation)
Argumentation In Flux (Modélisation du changement dans la théorie de l'argumentation) Abstract argumentation frameworks are a widely used formalism in the field of ...
KEMAMPUAN MENULIS ARGUMENTASI MAHASISWA Survei pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
KEMAMPUAN MENULIS ARGUMENTASI MAHASISWA Survei pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
This research is aimed to determine the correlation between (1) grammatical competency and the ability in writing argumentation, (2) attitude toward Indonesian language and the abi...
The Prosecutor's Fallacy Framed as a Sample Space Substitution
The Prosecutor's Fallacy Framed as a Sample Space Substitution
The Prosecutor’s Fallacy has been described as a particular error in statistical reasoning that exaggerates a defendant’s probability of guilt, although it also occurs in other set...

Back to Top