Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The gambler's fallacy fallacy (fallacy)

View through CrossRef
The gambler's fallacy is the irrational belief that prior outcomes in a series of events affect the probability of a future outcome, even though the events in question are independent and identically distributed. In this paper, we argue that in the standard account of the gambler's fallacy, the gambler's fallacy fallacy can arise: The irrational belief that all beliefs pertaining to the probabilities of sequences of outcomes constitute the gambler's fallacy, when, in fact, they do not. Specifically, the odds of the probabilities of some sequences of outcomes can be epistemically rational in a given decision-making situation. Not only are such odds of probabilities of sequences of outcomes not the gambler's fallacy, but they can be implemented as a simple heuristic for avoiding the gambler's fallacy in risk-related decision-making. However, we have to be careful not to fall prey to a variant of the gambler's fallacy, the gambler's fallacy fallacy (fallacy), in which we do not calculate odds for the probabilities of sequences that matter, but rather simply believe that the raw probability for the occurrence of a sequence of outcomes is the probability for the last outcome in that sequence.
Center for Open Science
Title: The gambler's fallacy fallacy (fallacy)
Description:
The gambler's fallacy is the irrational belief that prior outcomes in a series of events affect the probability of a future outcome, even though the events in question are independent and identically distributed.
In this paper, we argue that in the standard account of the gambler's fallacy, the gambler's fallacy fallacy can arise: The irrational belief that all beliefs pertaining to the probabilities of sequences of outcomes constitute the gambler's fallacy, when, in fact, they do not.
Specifically, the odds of the probabilities of some sequences of outcomes can be epistemically rational in a given decision-making situation.
Not only are such odds of probabilities of sequences of outcomes not the gambler's fallacy, but they can be implemented as a simple heuristic for avoiding the gambler's fallacy in risk-related decision-making.
However, we have to be careful not to fall prey to a variant of the gambler's fallacy, the gambler's fallacy fallacy (fallacy), in which we do not calculate odds for the probabilities of sequences that matter, but rather simply believe that the raw probability for the occurrence of a sequence of outcomes is the probability for the last outcome in that sequence.

Related Results

The influence of gambler's fallacy and financial literacy on generation z's investment decisions in the digital era
The influence of gambler's fallacy and financial literacy on generation z's investment decisions in the digital era
Financial decisions play a significant role in determining an individual’s economic well-being, especially in today’s digital era, where access to financial services and informatio...
The Pathetic Fallacy in Hellenistic Pastoral
The Pathetic Fallacy in Hellenistic Pastoral
Thee, shepherd, thee the woods, and desert caves And all their echoes mourn.Milton,LycidasWebster's Third International Dictionary defines the ‘pathetic fallacy’ as ‘the ascription...
Nietzsche versus the Genetic Fallacy
Nietzsche versus the Genetic Fallacy
Abstract Did Nietzsche rely on genetic fallacies? I argue that while he published two minor instances of the fallacy, he also struggled mightily against a particular...
Linguistic Imperialism
Linguistic Imperialism
Abstract The study of linguistic imperialism entails analyzing the policies by which dominant languages, nationally and internationally, have been consolidated and what t...
Extreme Losers: On Excess and Profitless Expenditure in Male Gambler Practices
Extreme Losers: On Excess and Profitless Expenditure in Male Gambler Practices
The essay looks at male gambling by investigating it as a form of resistance to the utilitarian values which lie at the base of the market logic. Here the excess is viewed as a cen...
Exploring the problem gambling health-harm paradox
Exploring the problem gambling health-harm paradox
Purpose: Previous research by NatCen identified a potential health-harm paradox for mental wellbeing and gambling, finding that those with poor mental wellbeing or a diagnosed ment...
Determination of the Psychological Burden of Gambling Harm in Iraq
Determination of the Psychological Burden of Gambling Harm in Iraq
Aim: To find out the association between psychosocial burden and the sociodemographic data such us (gender, age, social status, level of education, residential, occupational and ec...
Did Jesus Commit a Fallacy?
Did Jesus Commit a Fallacy?
Jesus has been accused of committing a fallacy (of denying the antecedent) at John 8:47. Careful analysis of this text (1) reveals a hitherto unrecognized valid form of argument wh...

Back to Top