Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evaluation of Retention force of Two Different Attachments for Mandibular Implant Supported Overdenture (A Comparative Study)
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Objectives: In an in vitro study, comparing the maximum retentive force of ball and socket attachments with locator attachments for mandibular implant-supported overdentures.
Background: Dental implants have revolutionized the field of prosthodontics by offering a reliable and stable solution for patients with missing teeth. Among the various types of implant-supported overdentures, mandibular implant-supported overdentures are commonly used to improve function and esthetics for individuals with total edentulism in the mandible. Retention force is a crucial factor in the success of mandibular implant-supported overdentures, as it directly impacts the stability and comfort of the prosthesis.
Materials and Methods: A comparative study was conducted on two groups of patients who received mandibular implant-supported overdentures with different attachment systems. Group A: received overdentures with Ball and socket attachment system, while Group B: received overdentures with Locator implant attachment system. The retention force of each attachment system was measured using a standardized testing protocol. The measurements were taken at different time points to assess the initial and long-term retention force of the attachments. A gradual increase in tension was observed, and the maximum force required to retain was calculated. The evaluation of retention will occur at baseline (T0) and after 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), and one year (T4) of usage.
Results: The study revealed that Attachment System Ball /Ring exhibited significantly higher retention force compared to Locator implant Attachment System in the initial term assessments. This difference in retention force could be attributed to the design and material properties of the two attachment systems. Locator implant Attachment System demonstrated superior retention force at the end term of assessment.
Conclusion: Both types of attachment systems; Ball/O Ring and Locator attachments are trustworthy modalities for advancement the retention and stability of implant retained mandibular over denture with superior initial stability results for the Locator attachment.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Evaluation of Retention force of Two Different Attachments for Mandibular Implant Supported Overdenture
(A Comparative Study)
Description:
Abstract
Objectives: In an in vitro study, comparing the maximum retentive force of ball and socket attachments with locator attachments for mandibular implant-supported overdentures.
Background: Dental implants have revolutionized the field of prosthodontics by offering a reliable and stable solution for patients with missing teeth.
Among the various types of implant-supported overdentures, mandibular implant-supported overdentures are commonly used to improve function and esthetics for individuals with total edentulism in the mandible.
Retention force is a crucial factor in the success of mandibular implant-supported overdentures, as it directly impacts the stability and comfort of the prosthesis.
Materials and Methods: A comparative study was conducted on two groups of patients who received mandibular implant-supported overdentures with different attachment systems.
Group A: received overdentures with Ball and socket attachment system, while Group B: received overdentures with Locator implant attachment system.
The retention force of each attachment system was measured using a standardized testing protocol.
The measurements were taken at different time points to assess the initial and long-term retention force of the attachments.
A gradual increase in tension was observed, and the maximum force required to retain was calculated.
The evaluation of retention will occur at baseline (T0) and after 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 9 months (T3), and one year (T4) of usage.
Results: The study revealed that Attachment System Ball /Ring exhibited significantly higher retention force compared to Locator implant Attachment System in the initial term assessments.
This difference in retention force could be attributed to the design and material properties of the two attachment systems.
Locator implant Attachment System demonstrated superior retention force at the end term of assessment.
Conclusion: Both types of attachment systems; Ball/O Ring and Locator attachments are trustworthy modalities for advancement the retention and stability of implant retained mandibular over denture with superior initial stability results for the Locator attachment.
Related Results
Retention Evaluation of Implant-Supported Palateless Maxillary Overdentures Retained by PEEK Telescopic Attachment
Retention Evaluation of Implant-Supported Palateless Maxillary Overdentures Retained by PEEK Telescopic Attachment
Background: Retention and stabilization of implant-supported overdenture is associated with more patient satisfaction, chewing capability, and oral health-related quality of life. ...
Observation of the effect on immediate mandibular implant-supported overdenture of micro implant system of Italy
Observation of the effect on immediate mandibular implant-supported overdenture of micro implant system of Italy
The study was design to investigate the clinical effect of Micro implant system in Italy on immediate mandibular implant-supported overdenture. A total of 192 patients with mandibu...
Attachment Retained Tooth Supported Overdentures: A Case Series
Attachment Retained Tooth Supported Overdentures: A Case Series
Present case series describes the three different types of attachments use for tooth supported overdenture for prosthetic rehabilitation. Loss of teeth causes continuous resorption...
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Abstract
Background
Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone d...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
The influence of mandibular implant‐retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency
The influence of mandibular implant‐retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency
doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2011.00539.xThe influence of mandibular implant‐retained overdentures in masticatory efficiencyObjective: To evaluate the masticatory efficiency of patien...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Cement Selection for Implant‐Supported Crowns Fabricated with Different Luting Space Settings
Cement Selection for Implant‐Supported Crowns Fabricated with Different Luting Space Settings
AbstractPurpose: To measure and compare the retentive strength of cements specifically formulated for luting restorations onto implant abutments and to investigate the effect of va...

