Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Copyright and the University

View through CrossRef
Who owns the copyright in this Article? It turns out that this is a surprisingly difficult question to answer. I am the author-I wrote the words, I did the research, I collected and analyzed the data-but it is not clear that I am the "author" for copyright purposes and therefore the initial copyright owner. Under the common law, the "teacher exception" held that professors owned the fruits of their intellectual labor, notwithstanding the general rule that employers own the copyright in works created by their employees. Whether this exception survived the enactment of the 1976 Copyright Act, however, remains an unresolved question. Few courts have addressed the issue and Congress has not clarified matters. This Article instead looks for answers in current university practice. It presents the first empirical study of university copyright policies in over twenty years, which reveals two different-and contradictory-things. First, all of the copyright policies in the survey treat the faculty member as the owner of the copyright. In other words, the policies reflect the academic tradition of vesting copyright ownership with faculty members. But the study also shows that many universities seek to reserve for themselves copyright "authorship" and therefore the ultimate right to control ownership. This is contrary both to the Copyright Act and to the academic tradition that gives faculty members the rights in their work. University control over copyright in faculty works would threaten academic freedom and the utilitarian and expressive values that copyright protects. Informed by the study, the Article argues that answering the initial question-who owns the copyright in this article?-is not so difficult after all, at least as a practical matter. Given that nearly all universities treat faculty members as the owners of their creative works, and given that faculty members consistently act accordingly, the teacher exception persists. But as a legal matter, faculty control over their work will remain uncertain unless courts clarify and universities acknowledge that faculty are the copyright "authors" of their work.
Elsevier BV
Title: Copyright and the University
Description:
Who owns the copyright in this Article? It turns out that this is a surprisingly difficult question to answer.
I am the author-I wrote the words, I did the research, I collected and analyzed the data-but it is not clear that I am the "author" for copyright purposes and therefore the initial copyright owner.
Under the common law, the "teacher exception" held that professors owned the fruits of their intellectual labor, notwithstanding the general rule that employers own the copyright in works created by their employees.
Whether this exception survived the enactment of the 1976 Copyright Act, however, remains an unresolved question.
Few courts have addressed the issue and Congress has not clarified matters.
This Article instead looks for answers in current university practice.
It presents the first empirical study of university copyright policies in over twenty years, which reveals two different-and contradictory-things.
First, all of the copyright policies in the survey treat the faculty member as the owner of the copyright.
In other words, the policies reflect the academic tradition of vesting copyright ownership with faculty members.
But the study also shows that many universities seek to reserve for themselves copyright "authorship" and therefore the ultimate right to control ownership.
This is contrary both to the Copyright Act and to the academic tradition that gives faculty members the rights in their work.
University control over copyright in faculty works would threaten academic freedom and the utilitarian and expressive values that copyright protects.
Informed by the study, the Article argues that answering the initial question-who owns the copyright in this article?-is not so difficult after all, at least as a practical matter.
Given that nearly all universities treat faculty members as the owners of their creative works, and given that faculty members consistently act accordingly, the teacher exception persists.
But as a legal matter, faculty control over their work will remain uncertain unless courts clarify and universities acknowledge that faculty are the copyright "authors" of their work.

Related Results

<i>MGM v. Grokster</i> – Amicus Brief of Professors Peter S. Menell, David Nimmer, Robert P. Merges, and Justin Hughes
<i>MGM v. Grokster</i> – Amicus Brief of Professors Peter S. Menell, David Nimmer, Robert P. Merges, and Justin Hughes
This case turns on whether the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in <i>Sony</i> conclusively resolves at the summary judgment stage the present dispute – involving striking...
Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
The aim of this paper is to investigate and present concepts of the author and his/her copyright work in copyright legislation that entered into force in Croatia from 1846 to 2007....
Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy
Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy
As copyright issues have moved towards the forefront of popular culture, trade, and the Supreme Court docket, we have lost sight of the first principles framed copyright’s developm...
Copyright Backlash
Copyright Backlash
In the past decade the entertainment industry has waged a legally very successful campaign against online copyright infringements. In a series of high profile decisions, content in...
Copyrighting People
Copyrighting People
This Essay, delivered as the 2024 Donald C. Brace Lecture for The Copyright Society, reveals the increasing convergence of right of publicity and copyright laws. This convergence r...
Copyright and the University
Copyright and the University
Who owns the copyright in this Article? It turns out that this is a surprisingly difficult question to answer. I am the author – I wrote the words, I did the research, I collected ...
When Copyright is Wrong
When Copyright is Wrong
While copyright legally protects the ownership of created works, fair dealing with copyrighted content has become a problematic topic with the rise of user-generated content. User-...
When Copyright is Wrong
When Copyright is Wrong
While copyright legally protects the ownership of created works, fair dealing with copyrighted content has become a problematic topic with the rise of user-generated content. User-...

Back to Top