Javascript must be enabled to continue!
When Copyright is Wrong
View through CrossRef
While copyright legally protects the ownership of created works, fair dealing with copyrighted content has become a problematic topic with the rise of user-generated content. User-generated content can be easily produced with modern technology and shared on the internet. This has resulted in websites having complicated processes for dealing with copyrighted content and many have introduced automated copyright detection systems to limit their liabilities of copyright infringement. Since automated copyright detection systems have been introduced, they have fundamentally changed the way copyright infringement is managed online. However, a problem arises with automated copyright detection systems as they are incapable of detecting fair dealing. Fair dealing is a provision under New Zealand’s Copyright Act 1994 that allows the use of copyrighted content in certain cases. Consequently, this has turned into a controversial area between content creators and copyright holders as most user-generated content usually contains copyrighted content. Copyright laws also favour mass media companies as they control significant copyright properties, and this plays a key role in the economy. For this reason, copyright genuinely tends to focus on the rights of copyright holders and not so much for users of copyrighted content. Furthermore, New Zealand's Copyright Act 1994 has not been updated since 2011 and has become unsuitable for modern forms of creation on the internet. This research portfolio investigates the problematic issues concerning New Zealand’s Copyright Act 1994 with its application to user-generated content and YouTube’s automated copyright detection system called ‘Content ID’. To express research findings, this research portfolio contains a user-generated documentary and several other proposed methods of bypassing Content ID.
Title: When Copyright is Wrong
Description:
While copyright legally protects the ownership of created works, fair dealing with copyrighted content has become a problematic topic with the rise of user-generated content.
User-generated content can be easily produced with modern technology and shared on the internet.
This has resulted in websites having complicated processes for dealing with copyrighted content and many have introduced automated copyright detection systems to limit their liabilities of copyright infringement.
Since automated copyright detection systems have been introduced, they have fundamentally changed the way copyright infringement is managed online.
However, a problem arises with automated copyright detection systems as they are incapable of detecting fair dealing.
Fair dealing is a provision under New Zealand’s Copyright Act 1994 that allows the use of copyrighted content in certain cases.
Consequently, this has turned into a controversial area between content creators and copyright holders as most user-generated content usually contains copyrighted content.
Copyright laws also favour mass media companies as they control significant copyright properties, and this plays a key role in the economy.
For this reason, copyright genuinely tends to focus on the rights of copyright holders and not so much for users of copyrighted content.
Furthermore, New Zealand's Copyright Act 1994 has not been updated since 2011 and has become unsuitable for modern forms of creation on the internet.
This research portfolio investigates the problematic issues concerning New Zealand’s Copyright Act 1994 with its application to user-generated content and YouTube’s automated copyright detection system called ‘Content ID’.
To express research findings, this research portfolio contains a user-generated documentary and several other proposed methods of bypassing Content ID.
Related Results
<i>MGM v. Grokster</i> – Amicus Brief of Professors Peter S. Menell, David Nimmer, Robert P. Merges, and Justin Hughes
<i>MGM v. Grokster</i> – Amicus Brief of Professors Peter S. Menell, David Nimmer, Robert P. Merges, and Justin Hughes
This case turns on whether the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in <i>Sony</i> conclusively resolves at the summary judgment stage the present dispute – involving striking...
Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
The aim of this paper is to investigate and present concepts of the author and his/her copyright work in copyright legislation that entered into force in Croatia from 1846 to 2007....
Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy
Normative Copyright: A Conceptual Framework for Copyright Philosophy
As copyright issues have moved towards the forefront of popular culture, trade, and the Supreme Court docket, we have lost sight of the first principles framed copyright’s developm...
Copyright Backlash
Copyright Backlash
In the past decade the entertainment industry has waged a legally very successful campaign against online copyright infringements. In a series of high profile decisions, content in...
When Copyright is Wrong
When Copyright is Wrong
While copyright legally protects the ownership of created works, fair dealing with copyrighted content has become a problematic topic with the rise of user-generated content. User-...
Copyrighting People
Copyrighting People
This Essay, delivered as the 2024 Donald C. Brace Lecture for The Copyright Society, reveals the increasing convergence of right of publicity and copyright laws. This convergence r...
Copyright, Heritage and Australian Aboriginal Art
Copyright, Heritage and Australian Aboriginal Art
How Australian copyright law deals with Aboriginal painting has changed since the late 1980s. Prominent cases have moved the law towards greater protection and offered some recogni...
Copyright and the University
Copyright and the University
Who owns the copyright in this Article? It turns out that this is a surprisingly difficult question to answer. I am the author-I wrote the words, I did the research, I collected an...

