Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

When Copyright is Wrong

View through CrossRef
While copyright legally protects the ownership of created works, fair dealing with copyrighted content has become a problematic topic with the rise of user-generated content. User-generated content can be easily produced with modern technology and shared on the internet. This has resulted in websites having complicated processes for dealing with copyrighted content and many have introduced automated copyright detection systems to limit their liabilities of copyright infringement. Since automated copyright detection systems have been introduced, they have fundamentally changed the way copyright infringement is managed online. However, a problem arises with automated copyright detection systems as they are incapable of detecting fair dealing. Fair dealing is a provision under New Zealand’s Copyright Act 1994 that allows the use of copyrighted content in certain cases. Consequently, this has turned into a controversial area between content creators and copyright holders as most user-generated content usually contains copyrighted content. Copyright laws also favour mass media companies as they control significant copyright properties, and this plays a key role in the economy. For this reason, copyright genuinely tends to focus on the rights of copyright holders and not so much for users of copyrighted content. Furthermore, New Zealand's Copyright Act 1994 has not been updated since 2011 and has become unsuitable for modern forms of creation on the internet. This research portfolio investigates the problematic issues concerning New Zealand’s Copyright Act 1994 with its application to user-generated content and YouTube’s automated copyright detection system called ‘Content ID’. To express research findings, this research portfolio contains a user-generated documentary and several other proposed methods of bypassing Content ID.<p></p>
Victoria University of Wellington Library
Title: When Copyright is Wrong
Description:
While copyright legally protects the ownership of created works, fair dealing with copyrighted content has become a problematic topic with the rise of user-generated content.
User-generated content can be easily produced with modern technology and shared on the internet.
This has resulted in websites having complicated processes for dealing with copyrighted content and many have introduced automated copyright detection systems to limit their liabilities of copyright infringement.
Since automated copyright detection systems have been introduced, they have fundamentally changed the way copyright infringement is managed online.
However, a problem arises with automated copyright detection systems as they are incapable of detecting fair dealing.
Fair dealing is a provision under New Zealand’s Copyright Act 1994 that allows the use of copyrighted content in certain cases.
Consequently, this has turned into a controversial area between content creators and copyright holders as most user-generated content usually contains copyrighted content.
Copyright laws also favour mass media companies as they control significant copyright properties, and this plays a key role in the economy.
For this reason, copyright genuinely tends to focus on the rights of copyright holders and not so much for users of copyrighted content.
Furthermore, New Zealand's Copyright Act 1994 has not been updated since 2011 and has become unsuitable for modern forms of creation on the internet.
This research portfolio investigates the problematic issues concerning New Zealand’s Copyright Act 1994 with its application to user-generated content and YouTube’s automated copyright detection system called ‘Content ID’.
To express research findings, this research portfolio contains a user-generated documentary and several other proposed methods of bypassing Content ID.
<p></p>.

Related Results

Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
Authorship in Croatian copyright legislation from 1846 to 2007
The aim of this paper is to investigate and present concepts of the author and his/her copyright work in copyright legislation that entered into force in Croatia from 1846 to 2007....
When Copyright is Wrong
When Copyright is Wrong
While copyright legally protects the ownership of created works, fair dealing with copyrighted content has become a problematic topic with the rise of user-generated content. User-...
Copyright, Heritage and Australian Aboriginal Art
Copyright, Heritage and Australian Aboriginal Art
How Australian copyright law deals with Aboriginal painting has changed since the late 1980s. Prominent cases have moved the law towards greater protection and offered some recogni...
Recentering Creativity in Copyright Law Discourse
Recentering Creativity in Copyright Law Discourse
Copyright discourse often centres around creativity; as a rationale for copyright, and as a threshold for copyright to subsist in songs, books, art and other creative works. Yet cr...
Playing with Copyright
Playing with Copyright
Copyright education has become an important aspect of librarians’ information literacy and scholarly communications activities. These include providing support and delivering teach...
Copyright's Free Speech Burdens
Copyright's Free Speech Burdens
Abstract This chapter examines more precisely when and how copyright does—and does not—burden speech. We can divide copyright's speech burdens into three distinct, y...
Remaking Copyright in the First Amendment's Image
Remaking Copyright in the First Amendment's Image
Abstract Courts are not the only realm in which First Amendment values should come into play in defining and delimiting copyright. Concern over copyright's speech‐bu...
Foreing and domestic experience in protecting intellectual property right to jewelry and jewelry
Foreing and domestic experience in protecting intellectual property right to jewelry and jewelry
Key words: copyright, jewelry, bijouterie, unfair competition, trademark, litigation Fedorova N. Foreing and domestic experience in protecting intellectual property right to jewel...

Back to Top