Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Unabridged Fifteenth Amendment
View through CrossRef
In the legal histories of Reconstruction, the Fifteenth Amendment is usually an afterthought compared to the Fourteenth Amendment. This oversight is perplexing: the Fifteenth Amendment ushered in a brief period of multi-racial democracy and laid the constitutional foundation for the Voting Rights Act of 1965. This Article helps to complete the historical record, providing a thorough accounting of the Fifteenth Amendment’s text, history, and purpose.<br><br>This Article situates the Fifteenth Amendment within the broad array of constitutional provisions, federal statutes, fundamental conditions, and state laws that enfranchised—and disenfranchised—Black men during Reconstruction. It then dives into the congressional debate, cataloging every version of the Amendment that was voted on. Next, this Article turns to the ratification debate, an intense partisan affair that culminated in Congress compelling four Southern States’ ratification as part of their re-admission to the Union.<br><br>Uncovering the Fifteenth Amendment’s past has important implications for today’s doctrinal questions. This Article, however, does not focus on answering those questions, but instead centers on the issues debated by the ratifying generation. The Reconstruction Framers were united in their goal of enfranchising Black men nationwide, but they were deeply divided over how best to achieve that goal and whether other disenfranchised groups—women, Irish Americans, and Chinese immigrants—should be covered by the Amendment as well. In addition, the Reconstruction Framers debated whether and how the Amendment could be circumvented and whether officeholding should be explicitly protected. <br><br>This Article argues that the Fifteenth Amendment’s original understanding went beyond forbidding facially discriminatory voting qualifications; the Fifteenth Amendment also prohibited the use of racial proxies and, albeit less clearly, protected the right to hold office. But more fundamentally, the Fifteenth Amendment rejected the original Constitution’s theory of democracy, which delegated to States the authority to decide who deserved the franchise based on whether they had a sufficient stake in the community or their interests were virtually represented. In short, the Fifteenth Amendment is the first constitutional provision to embrace the idea that the right to vote is preservative of all other rights.
Title: The Unabridged Fifteenth Amendment
Description:
In the legal histories of Reconstruction, the Fifteenth Amendment is usually an afterthought compared to the Fourteenth Amendment.
This oversight is perplexing: the Fifteenth Amendment ushered in a brief period of multi-racial democracy and laid the constitutional foundation for the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
This Article helps to complete the historical record, providing a thorough accounting of the Fifteenth Amendment’s text, history, and purpose.
<br><br>This Article situates the Fifteenth Amendment within the broad array of constitutional provisions, federal statutes, fundamental conditions, and state laws that enfranchised—and disenfranchised—Black men during Reconstruction.
It then dives into the congressional debate, cataloging every version of the Amendment that was voted on.
Next, this Article turns to the ratification debate, an intense partisan affair that culminated in Congress compelling four Southern States’ ratification as part of their re-admission to the Union.
<br><br>Uncovering the Fifteenth Amendment’s past has important implications for today’s doctrinal questions.
This Article, however, does not focus on answering those questions, but instead centers on the issues debated by the ratifying generation.
The Reconstruction Framers were united in their goal of enfranchising Black men nationwide, but they were deeply divided over how best to achieve that goal and whether other disenfranchised groups—women, Irish Americans, and Chinese immigrants—should be covered by the Amendment as well.
In addition, the Reconstruction Framers debated whether and how the Amendment could be circumvented and whether officeholding should be explicitly protected.
<br><br>This Article argues that the Fifteenth Amendment’s original understanding went beyond forbidding facially discriminatory voting qualifications; the Fifteenth Amendment also prohibited the use of racial proxies and, albeit less clearly, protected the right to hold office.
But more fundamentally, the Fifteenth Amendment rejected the original Constitution’s theory of democracy, which delegated to States the authority to decide who deserved the franchise based on whether they had a sufficient stake in the community or their interests were virtually represented.
In short, the Fifteenth Amendment is the first constitutional provision to embrace the idea that the right to vote is preservative of all other rights.
Related Results
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Brief for Professor Travis Crum as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Robinson Appellants, Louisiana v. Callais
Brief for Professor Travis Crum as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Robinson Appellants, Louisiana v. Callais
In Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), this Court recognized racial gerrymandering claims under the Equal Protection Clause. <a></a><i>Id.</i> at 652. This C...
Grutter's First Amendment
Grutter's First Amendment
Most of the reaction to the Supreme Court's decision affirming the law school affirmative action policy at issue in Grutter v. Bollinger has focused on its Fourteenth Amendment imp...
Not Frozen In Amber: The Second Amendment And The Constitutional Right To Innovation
Not Frozen In Amber: The Second Amendment And The Constitutional Right To Innovation
This Article advances a novel claim: the Second Amendment is the only constitutional provision that explicitly protects access to a category of technological artifacts: "arms.'' Un...
Brief for Professor Travis Crum as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees/Respondents, Allen v. Milligan
Brief for Professor Travis Crum as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees/Respondents, Allen v. Milligan
<p>Alabama makes two peculiar and unprecedented arguments about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and Congress’s enforcement authority under the Reconstruction Amen...
Public Law in the State Courts in 1925–1926
Public Law in the State Courts in 1925–1926
Validity of Procedure. In the summer of 1925 the appellate division of the supreme court of New York held that the City Home Rule Amendment of 1923 had not been legally adopted and...
Unamendments
Unamendments
The Constitution of the United States provides, in Article V, for its own amendment, but not every proposal for change is properly an "Amendment to this Constitution" within the me...
Constitutional Amendments and the Constitutional Common Law
Constitutional Amendments and the Constitutional Common Law
Constitutions obsolesce rapidly, and must be updated over time to reflect changes in the polity's circumstances and citizens' values. What institution or process should be entrust...

