Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of the hemodynamic response of dexmedetomidine versus additional intravenous lidocaine with propofol during tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled study
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundLaryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are strong stimuli that cause a reflex increase in blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and serum catecholamine level. These can lead to myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accidents. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine combined with propofol in attenuating the hemodynamic response following laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.MethodsThis study was a randomized controlled study and adhered to the CONSORT guidelines. One-hundred and six patients undergoing elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were divided randomly into two groups. Group D received dexmedetomidine (1 μg kg− 1) before induction. Group LP received lidocaine (1.5 mg kg− 1) before induction with additional propofol (0.5 mg kg− 1) before laryngoscopy. The primary endpoint was hemodynamic including systolic (S) BP, diastolic (D) BP, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and HR measured before and after induction and ≤ 10 min after intubation. Secondary outcome was complications/adverse effects.ResultsAfter induction, the mean SBP, DBP, MAP and HR decreased significantly from baseline in both groups except for mean HR in group LP at 1 min. Differences in mean values of SBP, DBP, and MAP were significantly lower in group D after intubation at 4–10 min (P < 0.05). Group LP had a non-inferior effect in blunting BP at all time points except 1 and 2 min after induction, and 2 min after intubation. The mean difference in HR in group D was significantly lower than that in group LP at all time points (P < 0.001). Group D had significantly more episodes of bradycardia (18.87% vs. 0%,P = 0.001) and hypotension (52.83% vs. 15.09%,P < 0.001) than did group LP.ConclusionLidocaine (1.5 mg kg− 1) with additional propofol (0.5 mg kg− 1) had a non-inferior effect compared with dexmedetomidine (1 μg kg− 1) in attenuating the hemodynamic response following laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, and had fewer adverse effects.Trial registrationThai Clinical Trial Registry, (TRTC20190206002). Retrospectively registered 4 February 2019.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Comparison of the hemodynamic response of dexmedetomidine versus additional intravenous lidocaine with propofol during tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled study
Description:
AbstractBackgroundLaryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are strong stimuli that cause a reflex increase in blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and serum catecholamine level.
These can lead to myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accidents.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine combined with propofol in attenuating the hemodynamic response following laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.
MethodsThis study was a randomized controlled study and adhered to the CONSORT guidelines.
One-hundred and six patients undergoing elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were divided randomly into two groups.
Group D received dexmedetomidine (1 μg kg− 1) before induction.
Group LP received lidocaine (1.
5 mg kg− 1) before induction with additional propofol (0.
5 mg kg− 1) before laryngoscopy.
The primary endpoint was hemodynamic including systolic (S) BP, diastolic (D) BP, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and HR measured before and after induction and ≤ 10 min after intubation.
Secondary outcome was complications/adverse effects.
ResultsAfter induction, the mean SBP, DBP, MAP and HR decreased significantly from baseline in both groups except for mean HR in group LP at 1 min.
Differences in mean values of SBP, DBP, and MAP were significantly lower in group D after intubation at 4–10 min (P < 0.
05).
Group LP had a non-inferior effect in blunting BP at all time points except 1 and 2 min after induction, and 2 min after intubation.
The mean difference in HR in group D was significantly lower than that in group LP at all time points (P < 0.
001).
Group D had significantly more episodes of bradycardia (18.
87% vs.
0%,P = 0.
001) and hypotension (52.
83% vs.
15.
09%,P < 0.
001) than did group LP.
ConclusionLidocaine (1.
5 mg kg− 1) with additional propofol (0.
5 mg kg− 1) had a non-inferior effect compared with dexmedetomidine (1 μg kg− 1) in attenuating the hemodynamic response following laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, and had fewer adverse effects.
Trial registrationThai Clinical Trial Registry, (TRTC20190206002).
Retrospectively registered 4 February 2019.
Related Results
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Harfaoui W, Alilou M, El Adib AR, Zidouh S, Zentar A, Lekehal B, et al. Patient Safety in Anesthesiology: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects. Cureus. 2024 Sep; 16(9). doi: 10.7759...
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Background: Skin metastases occur in 5% - 30% of breast cancer patients, highlighting the need for effective treatments. Electrochemotherapy, which combines electric pulses with ch...
Nasal and Intravenous Administration of Dexmedetomidine to Prevent the Emergence Agitation After the Vascular Interventional Surgery in Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study
Nasal and Intravenous Administration of Dexmedetomidine to Prevent the Emergence Agitation After the Vascular Interventional Surgery in Children: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study
Abstract
Introduction: Dexmedetomidine reduces the incidences of postanesthetic restlessness and hemodynamic fluctuations in children within acceptable ranges. Dexmedetomid...
Comparison of hemodynamic effects of intravenous labetalol plus intravenous fentanyl and intravenous fentanyl alone for attenuating reflex responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Comparison of hemodynamic effects of intravenous labetalol plus intravenous fentanyl and intravenous fentanyl alone for attenuating reflex responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Background: Laryngoscopy is an essential part of endotracheal intubation. Direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are a noxious stimulation that causes significant stress respo...
The Effects of Topical Anesthesia With Lidocaine 10% Spray Compared to Trans Tracheal and Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block in Hemodynamic Stability During Awake Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The Effects of Topical Anesthesia With Lidocaine 10% Spray Compared to Trans Tracheal and Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block in Hemodynamic Stability During Awake Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Hemodynamic changes is of great concern during awake intubation, particularly in patients with underlying medical conditions. As heterogeneities exist in regard to the best anesthe...
Comparison of Recovery Characteristics between Fentanyl-Propofol Dexmedetomidine: Propofol based Anaesthesia in Supratentorial Brain Tumor Surgery
Comparison of Recovery Characteristics between Fentanyl-Propofol Dexmedetomidine: Propofol based Anaesthesia in Supratentorial Brain Tumor Surgery
Background: The aim of the present study is to compare the recovery profiles, perioperative hemodynamic changes and undesirable side-effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiti...
Comparison of hemodynamic response of intravenous lidocaine and esmolol during laryngoscopic intubation under general anesthesia for major abdominal surgery
Comparison of hemodynamic response of intravenous lidocaine and esmolol during laryngoscopic intubation under general anesthesia for major abdominal surgery
Background: Many studies have shown the beneficial effect of prophylactic lidocaine or esmolol on hemodynamic response during laryngoscopic intubation. Although many studies observ...
EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE VERSUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON ATTENUATION OF COUGH DURING TRACHEAL EXTUBATION AFTER ELECTIVE SURGERY: A COMPARATIVE DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY
EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE VERSUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON ATTENUATION OF COUGH DURING TRACHEAL EXTUBATION AFTER ELECTIVE SURGERY: A COMPARATIVE DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY
Objective: The objective of the study is to compare the effects of intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine in attenuating cough during tracheal extubation after elective surgery....

