Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE - PROPOFOL VERSUS FENTANYL -PROPOFOL ON INDUCTION DOSAGE AND INTUBATION RESPONSE
View through CrossRef
Background and Objective: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation during general anesthesia can provoke
noxious stimuli, leading to laryngosympathetic stimulation, characterized by hypertension, tachycardia, and
arrhythmias. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in mitigating the
hemodynamic stress responses associated with laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing
surgeries under general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Sixty adult participants aged between 18-55 years of
diverse gender representation,, scheduled for elective surgeries under general endotracheal anesthesia, were divided
into two groups, each comprising 30 patients. - Group D (Dexmedetomidine):Patients received intravenous (IV)
dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 mcg/kg body weight, diluted to 20 ml of normal saline (NS) IV over 10 minutes using a
syringe pump. Group F (Fentanyl Group):Patients received intravenous fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg body weight,
diluted to 20 ml of NS IV over 10 minutes using a syringe pump. Anesthesia induction was accomplished with IV Propofol
2mg/kg and IV vecuronium at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Anesthesia
maintenance was achieved with a combination of oxygen, nitrous oxide, 1-2% sevoflurane, and IV vecuronium. Heart rate
(HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at
various time intervals. In group F, one minute after laryngoscopy and intubation, there was a rise i Results- n heart rate
(HR) by 14 beats per minute (bpm) and an increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and
mean arterial pressure (MAP) by 2 mmHg each compared to baseline values. Conversely, in group D, HR, SBP, DBP, and
MAP decreased significantly by 4 bpm, 23 mmHg, 25 mmHg, and 24 mmHg respectively, compared to baseline values,
with a high level of statistical significance (p=0.0001). Both IV Dexmedetomidine at a Interpretation and Conclusiondose of 1 mcg/kg body weight administered over 10 minutes and IV Fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg body weight administered
over 2 minutes prior to induction effectively mitigate the hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation without
notable side effects. However, Dexmedetomidine exhibits greater efficacy and superiority over Fentanyl in attenuating
the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation .Group D experienced faster recovery and
required less propofol for induction, highlighting a more efficient sedation profile in this group compared to Group F.
Title: COMPARISON OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE - PROPOFOL VERSUS FENTANYL -PROPOFOL ON INDUCTION DOSAGE AND INTUBATION RESPONSE
Description:
Background and Objective: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation during general anesthesia can provoke
noxious stimuli, leading to laryngosympathetic stimulation, characterized by hypertension, tachycardia, and
arrhythmias.
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in mitigating the
hemodynamic stress responses associated with laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing
surgeries under general anesthesia.
Materials and Methods: Sixty adult participants aged between 18-55 years of
diverse gender representation,, scheduled for elective surgeries under general endotracheal anesthesia, were divided
into two groups, each comprising 30 patients.
- Group D (Dexmedetomidine):Patients received intravenous (IV)
dexmedetomidine at a dose of 1 mcg/kg body weight, diluted to 20 ml of normal saline (NS) IV over 10 minutes using a
syringe pump.
Group F (Fentanyl Group):Patients received intravenous fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg body weight,
diluted to 20 ml of NS IV over 10 minutes using a syringe pump.
Anesthesia induction was accomplished with IV Propofol
2mg/kg and IV vecuronium at a dose of 0.
1 mg/kg body weight to facilitate endotracheal intubation.
Anesthesia
maintenance was achieved with a combination of oxygen, nitrous oxide, 1-2% sevoflurane, and IV vecuronium.
Heart rate
(HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded at
various time intervals.
In group F, one minute after laryngoscopy and intubation, there was a rise i Results- n heart rate
(HR) by 14 beats per minute (bpm) and an increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and
mean arterial pressure (MAP) by 2 mmHg each compared to baseline values.
Conversely, in group D, HR, SBP, DBP, and
MAP decreased significantly by 4 bpm, 23 mmHg, 25 mmHg, and 24 mmHg respectively, compared to baseline values,
with a high level of statistical significance (p=0.
0001).
Both IV Dexmedetomidine at a Interpretation and Conclusiondose of 1 mcg/kg body weight administered over 10 minutes and IV Fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg body weight administered
over 2 minutes prior to induction effectively mitigate the hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation without
notable side effects.
However, Dexmedetomidine exhibits greater efficacy and superiority over Fentanyl in attenuating
the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation .
Group D experienced faster recovery and
required less propofol for induction, highlighting a more efficient sedation profile in this group compared to Group F.
Related Results
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Harfaoui W, Alilou M, El Adib AR, Zidouh S, Zentar A, Lekehal B, et al. Patient Safety in Anesthesiology: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects. Cureus. 2024 Sep; 16(9). doi: 10.7759...
Comparison of Recovery Characteristics between Fentanyl-Propofol Dexmedetomidine: Propofol based Anaesthesia in Supratentorial Brain Tumor Surgery
Comparison of Recovery Characteristics between Fentanyl-Propofol Dexmedetomidine: Propofol based Anaesthesia in Supratentorial Brain Tumor Surgery
Background: The aim of the present study is to compare the recovery profiles, perioperative hemodynamic changes and undesirable side-effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiti...
Comparison of Intubation Conditions between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Randomised Control Study
Comparison of Intubation Conditions between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Randomised Control Study
Introduction: Awake Fiberoptic Intubation (AFOI) is a valuable modality for airway management. Both optimal intubating condition and patient comfort are paramount for fiberoptic in...
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Background: Skin metastases occur in 5% - 30% of breast cancer patients, highlighting the need for effective treatments. Electrochemotherapy, which combines electric pulses with ch...
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Propofol and Propofol as a Sole Agent in Induction of General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Trial
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Propofol and Propofol as a Sole Agent in Induction of General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Trial
Introduction: Agents used for induction of anaesthesia often cause vasodilation and suppression of the sympathetic nervous system, leading to a drop in blood pressure. Additionally...
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine-Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine-Pentazocine for Monitored Anesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty
Background: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is increasingly being used in various surgical procedures due to its safety and effectiveness. Tympanoplasty, a common otological proced...
COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY BETWEEN INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH FENTANYL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PROPOFOL WITH FENTANYL FOR SEDATION IN DIAGNOSTIC UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY BETWEEN INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH FENTANYL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PROPOFOL WITH FENTANYL FOR SEDATION IN DIAGNOSTIC UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravenous dexmedetomidine with fentanyl versus intravenous propofol with fentanyl for sedation in ...
Effect of Labor Epidural Analgesia with and without Fentanyl on Infant Breast-feeding
Effect of Labor Epidural Analgesia with and without Fentanyl on Infant Breast-feeding
Background
The influence of labor epidural fentanyl on the neonate is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine whether epidural fentanyl has an impact ...

