Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Intubation Conditions between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Randomised Control Study

View through CrossRef
Introduction: Awake Fiberoptic Intubation (AFOI) is a valuable modality for airway management. Both optimal intubating condition and patient comfort are paramount for fiberoptic intubation. The challenges associated with the procedure are to provide adequate sedation while maintaining patent airway and ventilation. Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide procedural sedation. Therefore, this study was taken to compare intubating conditions and haemodynamic stability between dexmedetomidine and propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy. Methods: 60 patients of ASA physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery were enrolled for the study. They were randomly allocated into two groups, group D received dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion) and group P received propofol (1 mg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion). After achieving Ramsay sedation score of ≥2 bronchoscopy was performed. The following parameters were assessed and compared: Intubating conditions were evaluated by intubation score including vocal cord movement, coughing and limb movement. Post intubation condition was assessed by a subjective scale. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline, end of infusion and post intubation. Other parameters assessed were intubation time, sedation, number of attempts at intubation and any complications during the procedure. Results: Demographics were comparable. Intubating conditions and post intubation scores were comparable. Dexmedetomidine provided better haemodynamic stability at the end of infusion and post intubation (p = 0). Both provided a favorable sedation but propofol provided much deeper mean sedation score compared to dexmedetomidine. Intubation time was shorter in group D (p = 0). Conclusion: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide favorable intubation conditions, but dexmedetomidine in addition provides better haemodynamic stability and conscious sedation.
Title: Comparison of Intubation Conditions between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Randomised Control Study
Description:
Introduction: Awake Fiberoptic Intubation (AFOI) is a valuable modality for airway management.
Both optimal intubating condition and patient comfort are paramount for fiberoptic intubation.
The challenges associated with the procedure are to provide adequate sedation while maintaining patent airway and ventilation.
Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide procedural sedation.
Therefore, this study was taken to compare intubating conditions and haemodynamic stability between dexmedetomidine and propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy.
Methods: 60 patients of ASA physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery were enrolled for the study.
They were randomly allocated into two groups, group D received dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion) and group P received propofol (1 mg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion).
After achieving Ramsay sedation score of ≥2 bronchoscopy was performed.
The following parameters were assessed and compared: Intubating conditions were evaluated by intubation score including vocal cord movement, coughing and limb movement.
Post intubation condition was assessed by a subjective scale.
Haemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline, end of infusion and post intubation.
Other parameters assessed were intubation time, sedation, number of attempts at intubation and any complications during the procedure.
Results: Demographics were comparable.
Intubating conditions and post intubation scores were comparable.
Dexmedetomidine provided better haemodynamic stability at the end of infusion and post intubation (p = 0).
Both provided a favorable sedation but propofol provided much deeper mean sedation score compared to dexmedetomidine.
Intubation time was shorter in group D (p = 0).
Conclusion: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide favorable intubation conditions, but dexmedetomidine in addition provides better haemodynamic stability and conscious sedation.

Related Results

Study of Clinicoradiological Profile of Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
Study of Clinicoradiological Profile of Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
Introduction: Bronchoscopy is a procedure to visualize the tracheobronchial tree. There are three types of Bronchoscopy, rigid, flexible, and virtual Bronchoscopy. Rigid bronchosco...
Fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine during awake-fibreoptic intubation
Fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine during awake-fibreoptic intubation
Awake-fiberoptic intubation is considered the gold standard technique for managing an anticipated difficult airway. Therefore, it is of interest to compare and evaluate fentanyl an...

Back to Top