Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of Intubation Conditions between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Randomised Control Study
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Awake Fiberoptic Intubation (AFOI) is a valuable modality for airway management. Both optimal intubating condition and patient comfort are paramount for fiberoptic intubation. The challenges associated with the procedure are to provide adequate sedation while maintaining patent airway and ventilation. Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide procedural sedation. Therefore, this study was taken to compare intubating conditions and haemodynamic stability between dexmedetomidine and propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy. Methods: 60 patients of ASA physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery were enrolled for the study. They were randomly allocated into two groups, group D received dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion) and group P received propofol (1 mg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion). After achieving Ramsay sedation score of ≥2 bronchoscopy was performed. The following parameters were assessed and compared: Intubating conditions were evaluated by intubation score including vocal cord movement, coughing and limb movement. Post intubation condition was assessed by a subjective scale. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline, end of infusion and post intubation. Other parameters assessed were intubation time, sedation, number of attempts at intubation and any complications during the procedure. Results: Demographics were comparable. Intubating conditions and post intubation scores were comparable. Dexmedetomidine provided better haemodynamic stability at the end of infusion and post intubation (p = 0). Both provided a favorable sedation but propofol provided much deeper mean sedation score compared to dexmedetomidine. Intubation time was shorter in group D (p = 0). Conclusion: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide favorable intubation conditions, but dexmedetomidine in addition provides better haemodynamic stability and conscious sedation.
Informatics Publishing Limited
Title: Comparison of Intubation Conditions between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Randomised Control Study
Description:
Introduction: Awake Fiberoptic Intubation (AFOI) is a valuable modality for airway management.
Both optimal intubating condition and patient comfort are paramount for fiberoptic intubation.
The challenges associated with the procedure are to provide adequate sedation while maintaining patent airway and ventilation.
Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide procedural sedation.
Therefore, this study was taken to compare intubating conditions and haemodynamic stability between dexmedetomidine and propofol for Awake Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy.
Methods: 60 patients of ASA physical status I or II undergoing elective surgery were enrolled for the study.
They were randomly allocated into two groups, group D received dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion) and group P received propofol (1 mg/kg over 10 min followed by infusion).
After achieving Ramsay sedation score of ≥2 bronchoscopy was performed.
The following parameters were assessed and compared: Intubating conditions were evaluated by intubation score including vocal cord movement, coughing and limb movement.
Post intubation condition was assessed by a subjective scale.
Haemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline, end of infusion and post intubation.
Other parameters assessed were intubation time, sedation, number of attempts at intubation and any complications during the procedure.
Results: Demographics were comparable.
Intubating conditions and post intubation scores were comparable.
Dexmedetomidine provided better haemodynamic stability at the end of infusion and post intubation (p = 0).
Both provided a favorable sedation but propofol provided much deeper mean sedation score compared to dexmedetomidine.
Intubation time was shorter in group D (p = 0).
Conclusion: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol provide favorable intubation conditions, but dexmedetomidine in addition provides better haemodynamic stability and conscious sedation.
Related Results
Study of Clinicoradiological Profile of Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
Study of Clinicoradiological Profile of Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
Introduction: Bronchoscopy is a procedure to visualize the tracheobronchial tree. There are three types of Bronchoscopy, rigid, flexible, and virtual Bronchoscopy. Rigid bronchosco...
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Comparison of Intravenous Sedation with Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Breast Cancer Skin Lesion Electrochemotherapy: A Randomized, Double‐blinded Clinical Trial
Background: Skin metastases occur in 5% - 30% of breast cancer patients, highlighting the need for effective treatments. Electrochemotherapy, which combines electric pulses with ch...
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Comparison of Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Attenuation of Stress Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Elective Surgeries
Harfaoui W, Alilou M, El Adib AR, Zidouh S, Zentar A, Lekehal B, et al. Patient Safety in Anesthesiology: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects. Cureus. 2024 Sep; 16(9). doi: 10.7759...
Dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam-ketamine for sedation during awake fiberoptic nasal intubation in patients with difficult airway - A randomized, double-blinded, comparative trial
Dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam-ketamine for sedation during awake fiberoptic nasal intubation in patients with difficult airway - A randomized, double-blinded, comparative trial
Abstract
Background and Aims:
Both dexmedetomidine and midazolam-ketamine are known for their minimal respiratory depressant effects. While many ...
Comparison of Airtraq® Laryngoscope, Bonfils Endoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for Awake Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Comparison of Airtraq® Laryngoscope, Bonfils Endoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for Awake Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Over the last decades several indirect laryngoscopes have been developed to provide a significant better glottic view and improved the success rate in difficult intubations. Some c...
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Propofol and Propofol as a Sole Agent in Induction of General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Trial
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Propofol and Propofol as a Sole Agent in Induction of General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Trial
Introduction: Agents used for induction of anaesthesia often cause vasodilation and suppression of the sympathetic nervous system, leading to a drop in blood pressure. Additionally...
Comparison of Recovery Characteristics between Fentanyl-Propofol Dexmedetomidine: Propofol based Anaesthesia in Supratentorial Brain Tumor Surgery
Comparison of Recovery Characteristics between Fentanyl-Propofol Dexmedetomidine: Propofol based Anaesthesia in Supratentorial Brain Tumor Surgery
Background: The aim of the present study is to compare the recovery profiles, perioperative hemodynamic changes and undesirable side-effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiti...
Fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine during awake-fibreoptic intubation
Fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine during awake-fibreoptic intubation
Awake-fiberoptic intubation is considered the gold standard technique for managing an anticipated difficult airway. Therefore, it is of interest to compare and evaluate fentanyl an...

