Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Medical Embodiment of the Mena Dominance Law: Cross-Dataset ICU Mortality Modeling, Organ-Structured Deficit, and SOFA Comparison
View through CrossRef
This paper presents a medical embodiment study of the Mena Dominance Law (MDL) in critical care mortality modeling. The manuscript is intentionally narrower than the general MDL theory papers: it does not restate the law as a new universal claim, but evaluates whether MDL-derived representations carry clinically useful signal in intensive care unit (ICU) outcome prediction. The embodiment is studied across three major ICU resources-eICU, HiRID, and MIMIC-IV-together with cancer-focused subcohorts. The principal benchmark is SOFA, with emphasis on whether MDL-derived models, alone or in combination with SOFA, improve discrimination. Across the main strict six-organ cohorts, the combined MDL+SOFA models outperform SOFA-only models in every dataset. In eICU, strict six-organ AUC improves from 0.7533 for SOFA-only to 0.7954 for MDL-only and 0.8120 for MDL+SOFA. In HiRID, the corresponding values are 0.7759, 0.7805, and 0.8062. In MIMIC-IV, they are 0.6912, 0.7393, and 0.7562. Cancer subset analyses generally preserve the same directional pattern, although inference weakens materially in the smallest subgroup, the HiRID hematologic cancer-proxy strict organ-complete cohort. Beyond aggregate performance, the medical embodiment reveals structure that a pure summed severity score does not directly expose. Across datasets, non-survivors show both an upward shift in deficit burden and a redistribution of dominant-organ identity. In HiRID, survivors are most often respiratory-dominant, whereas deaths show relatively greater concentration in central nervous system, renal, and liver dominance. In MIMIC-IV, deaths are markedly more cardiovascular-dominant than survivors. These findings support the view that the embodiment captures structured multiorgan deterioration rather than undifferentiated severity alone. The strongest claim supported by the results is practical: in the declared critical-care embodiment studied here, MDL-derived features add clinically meaningful predictive information beyond SOFA and provide a more structured view of deficit organization across organ systems.
Title: A Medical Embodiment of the Mena Dominance Law: Cross-Dataset ICU Mortality Modeling, Organ-Structured Deficit, and SOFA Comparison
Description:
This paper presents a medical embodiment study of the Mena Dominance Law (MDL) in critical care mortality modeling.
The manuscript is intentionally narrower than the general MDL theory papers: it does not restate the law as a new universal claim, but evaluates whether MDL-derived representations carry clinically useful signal in intensive care unit (ICU) outcome prediction.
The embodiment is studied across three major ICU resources-eICU, HiRID, and MIMIC-IV-together with cancer-focused subcohorts.
The principal benchmark is SOFA, with emphasis on whether MDL-derived models, alone or in combination with SOFA, improve discrimination.
Across the main strict six-organ cohorts, the combined MDL+SOFA models outperform SOFA-only models in every dataset.
In eICU, strict six-organ AUC improves from 0.
7533 for SOFA-only to 0.
7954 for MDL-only and 0.
8120 for MDL+SOFA.
In HiRID, the corresponding values are 0.
7759, 0.
7805, and 0.
8062.
In MIMIC-IV, they are 0.
6912, 0.
7393, and 0.
7562.
Cancer subset analyses generally preserve the same directional pattern, although inference weakens materially in the smallest subgroup, the HiRID hematologic cancer-proxy strict organ-complete cohort.
Beyond aggregate performance, the medical embodiment reveals structure that a pure summed severity score does not directly expose.
Across datasets, non-survivors show both an upward shift in deficit burden and a redistribution of dominant-organ identity.
In HiRID, survivors are most often respiratory-dominant, whereas deaths show relatively greater concentration in central nervous system, renal, and liver dominance.
In MIMIC-IV, deaths are markedly more cardiovascular-dominant than survivors.
These findings support the view that the embodiment captures structured multiorgan deterioration rather than undifferentiated severity alone.
The strongest claim supported by the results is practical: in the declared critical-care embodiment studied here, MDL-derived features add clinically meaningful predictive information beyond SOFA and provide a more structured view of deficit organization across organ systems.
Related Results
Patient-level reclassification and discordance between SOFA and SOFA-2: a multicenter ICU study
Patient-level reclassification and discordance between SOFA and SOFA-2: a multicenter ICU study
Abstract
Background
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is widely used to quantify organ dysfunction in ...
SOFA-2 versus SOFA for mortality risk assessment in ICU patients with acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV and eICU
SOFA-2 versus SOFA for mortality risk assessment in ICU patients with acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV and eICU
Abstract
Background
Acute cholangitis (AC) can progress rapidly to organ failure and death. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment-2 (SOFA-2) is a recently revise...
Does SOFA-2 Improve Mortality Prediction in Sepsis? A Retrospective Single-Center Observational Cohort Study Comparing SOFA-1 and SOFA-2
Does SOFA-2 Improve Mortality Prediction in Sepsis? A Retrospective Single-Center Observational Cohort Study Comparing SOFA-1 and SOFA-2
Abstract
Background:
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score has been wide...
Does SOFA-2 improve mortality prediction in sepsis? A retrospective single-center observational cohort study comparing SOFA-1 and SOFA-2
Does SOFA-2 improve mortality prediction in sepsis? A retrospective single-center observational cohort study comparing SOFA-1 and SOFA-2
Abstract
Background
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score has been widely used for nearly three decades to...
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
<p><b>Background: Knowledge translation literature shows a delay between publication and uptake of research findings into clinical practice. There is uncertainty about ...
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
<p><b>Background: Knowledge translation literature shows a delay between publication and uptake of research findings into clinical practice. There is uncertainty about...
SOFA-2 Versus SOFA-1 for Mortality Prediction in Infection-Triggered ICU Patients
SOFA-2 Versus SOFA-1 for Mortality Prediction in Infection-Triggered ICU Patients
Background
Accurate assessment of organ dysfunction is essential for risk stratification in critically ill patients. The traditional Sequential Organ Failure As...
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: A multicentre, cross-sectional study
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: A multicentre, cross-sectional study
ABSTRACT
Objectives
To compare the accuracy of the SOFA and APACHE II scores in predicting mortality among ICU patients with se...

