Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Patient-level reclassification and discordance between SOFA and SOFA-2: a multicenter ICU study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is widely used to quantify organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. A revised version, SOFA-2, was proposed to better reflect contemporary intensive care practice, but patient-level reclassification and the implications of differences between SOFA and SOFA-2 remain unclear. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study using the OneICU database, a Japanese ICU registry including 15 hospitals. Adult ICU admissions between April 2012 and December 2025 were analyzed. Day-1 SOFA and SOFA-2 scores were calculated. Reclassification patterns were visualized using Sankey diagrams, and mortality patterns were assessed using heat maps. Score discordance was defined as SOFA deviation (dSOFA = SOFA-2 − SOFA) and categorized as Negative ( ≤ − 2), Minimal ( > − 2 and < 2), or Positive (≥ 2). Two primary exact-matching analyses were performed across dSOFA categories, separately matching patients on Day-1 SOFA-2 and conventional SOFA total scores. Results Among 134,528 ICU admissions, SOFA-2 resulted in systematic patient-level reclassification. Upward shifts were most frequent in the brain, cardiovascular, and respiratory subscores, whereas the kidney subscore showed bidirectional changes. Mortality increased with higher SOFA-2 subscores at fixed SOFA and with higher SOFA subscores at fixed SOFA-2. After exact matching on SOFA-2, mortality was highest in the Negative dSOFA group, in which SOFA was higher than SOFA-2. Conversely, after exact matching on conventional SOFA, mortality was highest in the Positive dSOFA group, in which SOFA-2 was higher than SOFA. Conclusions SOFA-2 introduces systematic reclassification at the patient level. Reciprocal exact-matching analyses demonstrated that patients assigned the same severity by one scoring system remained heterogeneous in mortality according to the other scoring system. SOFA and SOFA-2 may therefore provide overlapping but complementary information for assessing organ dysfunction severity.
Title: Patient-level reclassification and discordance between SOFA and SOFA-2: a multicenter ICU study
Description:
Abstract Background The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is widely used to quantify organ dysfunction in critically ill patients.
A revised version, SOFA-2, was proposed to better reflect contemporary intensive care practice, but patient-level reclassification and the implications of differences between SOFA and SOFA-2 remain unclear.
Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study using the OneICU database, a Japanese ICU registry including 15 hospitals.
Adult ICU admissions between April 2012 and December 2025 were analyzed.
Day-1 SOFA and SOFA-2 scores were calculated.
Reclassification patterns were visualized using Sankey diagrams, and mortality patterns were assessed using heat maps.
Score discordance was defined as SOFA deviation (dSOFA = SOFA-2 − SOFA) and categorized as Negative ( ≤ − 2), Minimal ( > − 2 and < 2), or Positive (≥ 2).
Two primary exact-matching analyses were performed across dSOFA categories, separately matching patients on Day-1 SOFA-2 and conventional SOFA total scores.
Results Among 134,528 ICU admissions, SOFA-2 resulted in systematic patient-level reclassification.
Upward shifts were most frequent in the brain, cardiovascular, and respiratory subscores, whereas the kidney subscore showed bidirectional changes.
Mortality increased with higher SOFA-2 subscores at fixed SOFA and with higher SOFA subscores at fixed SOFA-2.
After exact matching on SOFA-2, mortality was highest in the Negative dSOFA group, in which SOFA was higher than SOFA-2.
Conversely, after exact matching on conventional SOFA, mortality was highest in the Positive dSOFA group, in which SOFA-2 was higher than SOFA.
Conclusions SOFA-2 introduces systematic reclassification at the patient level.
Reciprocal exact-matching analyses demonstrated that patients assigned the same severity by one scoring system remained heterogeneous in mortality according to the other scoring system.
SOFA and SOFA-2 may therefore provide overlapping but complementary information for assessing organ dysfunction severity.

Related Results

Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
<p><b>Background: Knowledge translation literature shows a delay between publication and uptake of research findings into clinical practice. There is uncertainty about ...
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
<p><b>Background: Knowledge translation literature shows a delay between publication and uptake of research findings into clinical practice. There is uncertainty about...
SOFA-2 Versus SOFA-1 for Mortality Prediction in Infection-Triggered ICU Patients
SOFA-2 Versus SOFA-1 for Mortality Prediction in Infection-Triggered ICU Patients
Background Accurate assessment of organ dysfunction is essential for risk stratification in critically ill patients. The traditional Sequential Organ Failure As...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Burnout syndrome among Thai intensivists and nurses in pre-COVID19 era
Burnout syndrome among Thai intensivists and nurses in pre-COVID19 era
Background: Burnout syndrome (BOS), a work-related constellation of symptoms and signs, causes individuals emotional stress and is associated with increasing job-related disillusio...

Back to Top