Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

SOFA-2 versus SOFA for mortality risk assessment in ICU patients with acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV and eICU

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Acute cholangitis (AC) can progress rapidly to organ failure and death. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment-2 (SOFA-2) is a recently revised organ-dysfunction score, but whether it adds disease-specific value beyond SOFA in AC is unknown. We compared SOFA-2 with SOFA for mortality risk assessment in ICU patients with AC. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV v3.1 as the primary dataset and eICU for cross-database assessment. Adults with AC meeting Tokyo Guidelines 2018 diagnostic criteria were included. Day-1 SOFA-2 and SOFA were reconstructed over the first 24 h after ICU admission. The primary outcome was ICU mortality; secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 28-day mortality. Results The MIMIC-IV ICU cohort included 644 patients, with 71 ICU deaths, 102 in-hospital deaths, and 133 deaths within 28 days. SOFA-2 showed good discrimination for ICU mortality (AUROC, 0.834; 95% CI, 0.777–0.883), but its performance was similar to SOFA (AUROC, 0.838; 95% CI, 0.784–0.886; difference, − 0.005; 95% CI, − 0.020 to 0.010; P = 0.514). For in-hospital mortality, AUROCs were 0.786 for SOFA-2 and 0.784 for SOFA. For 28-day mortality, AUROCs were 0.760 and 0.756, respectively. Calibration, reclassification and decision-curve analyses did not show a clinically meaningful advantage for SOFA-2. ICU mortality increased across SOFA-2 strata, from 1.9% at scores 0–2 to 27.9% at scores ≥ 9. In eICU, SOFA-2 and SOFA again showed similar discrimination (AUROC, 0.833 vs 0.835), and mortality increased from 1.2% to 22.9% across the same score strata. Conclusions SOFA-2 stratified mortality risk in ICU patients with AC, but it did not outperform SOFA. These findings support SOFA-2 as a feasible disease-specific research measure, but they do not support replacing SOFA with SOFA-2 for clinical risk assessment in AC without further independent validation.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: SOFA-2 versus SOFA for mortality risk assessment in ICU patients with acute cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV and eICU
Description:
Abstract Background Acute cholangitis (AC) can progress rapidly to organ failure and death.
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment-2 (SOFA-2) is a recently revised organ-dysfunction score, but whether it adds disease-specific value beyond SOFA in AC is unknown.
We compared SOFA-2 with SOFA for mortality risk assessment in ICU patients with AC.
Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV v3.
1 as the primary dataset and eICU for cross-database assessment.
Adults with AC meeting Tokyo Guidelines 2018 diagnostic criteria were included.
Day-1 SOFA-2 and SOFA were reconstructed over the first 24 h after ICU admission.
The primary outcome was ICU mortality; secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 28-day mortality.
Results The MIMIC-IV ICU cohort included 644 patients, with 71 ICU deaths, 102 in-hospital deaths, and 133 deaths within 28 days.
SOFA-2 showed good discrimination for ICU mortality (AUROC, 0.
834; 95% CI, 0.
777–0.
883), but its performance was similar to SOFA (AUROC, 0.
838; 95% CI, 0.
784–0.
886; difference, − 0.
005; 95% CI, − 0.
020 to 0.
010; P = 0.
514).
For in-hospital mortality, AUROCs were 0.
786 for SOFA-2 and 0.
784 for SOFA.
For 28-day mortality, AUROCs were 0.
760 and 0.
756, respectively.
Calibration, reclassification and decision-curve analyses did not show a clinically meaningful advantage for SOFA-2.
ICU mortality increased across SOFA-2 strata, from 1.
9% at scores 0–2 to 27.
9% at scores ≥ 9.
In eICU, SOFA-2 and SOFA again showed similar discrimination (AUROC, 0.
833 vs 0.
835), and mortality increased from 1.
2% to 22.
9% across the same score strata.
Conclusions SOFA-2 stratified mortality risk in ICU patients with AC, but it did not outperform SOFA.
These findings support SOFA-2 as a feasible disease-specific research measure, but they do not support replacing SOFA with SOFA-2 for clinical risk assessment in AC without further independent validation.

Related Results

Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
<p><b>Background: Knowledge translation literature shows a delay between publication and uptake of research findings into clinical practice. There is uncertainty about ...
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
Oxygen management in New Zealand and Australian intensive care units: A knowledge translation study
<p><b>Background: Knowledge translation literature shows a delay between publication and uptake of research findings into clinical practice. There is uncertainty about...
SOFA-2 Versus SOFA-1 for Mortality Prediction in Infection-Triggered ICU Patients
SOFA-2 Versus SOFA-1 for Mortality Prediction in Infection-Triggered ICU Patients
Background Accurate assessment of organ dysfunction is essential for risk stratification in critically ill patients. The traditional Sequential Organ Failure As...

Back to Top