Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Verbal vocabulary of Turkic languages of the Sayano-Altai: common and specific

View through CrossRef
The subject of the research is the verbs of different lexical-semantic groups in the Altai, Khakas, and Tuvan languages. Material from other Turkic languages is also included. The study examines correspondences that connect these heterogeneous languages of the Sayan-Altai region and that are not found in other Turkic languages. The authors focus on parameters such as: 1) the presence of root-related lexemes with similar meanings; 2) commonalities/differences in their semantics; 3) commonalities/differences in the word-formation structure of the verbs. Based on these parameters, the following types of correspondences are identified for analysis: 1) equivalents (“full” correspondences); 2) correspondences with semantic differences; 3) correspondences with differences in word-formation structure. The origin of the words (Turkic or Mongolic) is also taken into account. This approach allows for the determination of the closeness of the Turkic languages of Siberia to each other, considering the convergent processes in this territory. The study of lexical units utilized methods such as descriptive, comparative, comparative-historical, and component analysis. The material was collected using the method of complete sampling. The novelty of the work lies in the fact that the comparative analysis of the verbs from different lexical-semantic groups is conducted according to several parameters. It has been established that the peculiarities of the common verb lexicon of the studied languages manifest not only in the presence of specific lexemes, some of which are recorded in ancient Turkic monuments, but also in the formation of secondary forms from common Turkic roots, and in the models used for verb formation and in the development of semantics. The correspondences derived from common Turkic roots mostly have differences in semantics or word-formation structure. An important part of the overall lexicon of these languages also includes Mongolic terms—completely borrowed lexemes and words derived from Mongolic roots. Such common verbs most often represent equivalents and correspondences that have semantic differences. In some cases, common verbs connect the Sayan-Altai languages with the Yakut and Kyrgyz languages.
Title: Verbal vocabulary of Turkic languages of the Sayano-Altai: common and specific
Description:
The subject of the research is the verbs of different lexical-semantic groups in the Altai, Khakas, and Tuvan languages.
Material from other Turkic languages is also included.
The study examines correspondences that connect these heterogeneous languages of the Sayan-Altai region and that are not found in other Turkic languages.
The authors focus on parameters such as: 1) the presence of root-related lexemes with similar meanings; 2) commonalities/differences in their semantics; 3) commonalities/differences in the word-formation structure of the verbs.
Based on these parameters, the following types of correspondences are identified for analysis: 1) equivalents (“full” correspondences); 2) correspondences with semantic differences; 3) correspondences with differences in word-formation structure.
The origin of the words (Turkic or Mongolic) is also taken into account.
This approach allows for the determination of the closeness of the Turkic languages of Siberia to each other, considering the convergent processes in this territory.
The study of lexical units utilized methods such as descriptive, comparative, comparative-historical, and component analysis.
The material was collected using the method of complete sampling.
The novelty of the work lies in the fact that the comparative analysis of the verbs from different lexical-semantic groups is conducted according to several parameters.
It has been established that the peculiarities of the common verb lexicon of the studied languages manifest not only in the presence of specific lexemes, some of which are recorded in ancient Turkic monuments, but also in the formation of secondary forms from common Turkic roots, and in the models used for verb formation and in the development of semantics.
The correspondences derived from common Turkic roots mostly have differences in semantics or word-formation structure.
An important part of the overall lexicon of these languages also includes Mongolic terms—completely borrowed lexemes and words derived from Mongolic roots.
Such common verbs most often represent equivalents and correspondences that have semantic differences.
In some cases, common verbs connect the Sayan-Altai languages with the Yakut and Kyrgyz languages.

Related Results

Kagan bitig based on ancient Turkic runic writing
Kagan bitig based on ancient Turkic runic writing
There are more than 30 countries in the world that have their own unique writing system. The Turkic peoples also had an autochthonous writing system however due to its “obscurity” ...
Новая книга Джу-Юп Ли «Тюркские народы в мировой истории»
Новая книга Джу-Юп Ли «Тюркские народы в мировой истории»
The article is a review of the recently published book “The Turkic Peoples in World History” by Yoo-Yup Lee (Routledge, 2024, “Themes in World History” Series) which can be seen as...
Secondary meanings of the Verb chyk= ~ sykh= ‘to go out, to leave’ in Southern Siberian Turkic languages and Kipchak languages
Secondary meanings of the Verb chyk= ~ sykh= ‘to go out, to leave’ in Southern Siberian Turkic languages and Kipchak languages
The article describes the semantic structure of one of the most polysemantic motion verbs in Turkic languages, namely the verb čïq= ~ sïx= and the correlating Tuvan verb ün=. The s...
Historical Turkic Literary Languages and Khwarezm Turkic
Historical Turkic Literary Languages and Khwarezm Turkic
There are several unresolved problematic issues in Turkology. This is the result of the settlement of Turkic tribes, which were numerous throughout history, over a wide geography. ...
Az altajisták szerepe az összehasonlító magyar nyelvészeti kutatásokban
Az altajisták szerepe az összehasonlító magyar nyelvészeti kutatásokban
According to research of the Hungarian scholars of Altaic languages, the Turkish Language has no direct genetic contact with the Hungarian, i. e. they are no...
LEXICON OF TURKIC ORIGIN IN “JAMSHID AND KHURSHID” MASNAVI’S LANGUAGE
LEXICON OF TURKIC ORIGIN IN “JAMSHID AND KHURSHID” MASNAVI’S LANGUAGE
From the point of view of studying the centuries-old history of the Turkish language, these language monuments created by Turkish poets and writers in the Middle Ages are important...
Verbal vocabulary of foraging in the languages of the Altai-Sayan region
Verbal vocabulary of foraging in the languages of the Altai-Sayan region
This study investigates the semantics, distribution, and origins of verbs related to foraging. This analysis focuses on three Turkic languages from the Altai-Sayan region: Altai, C...
On the word bolmačï in Turkic Languages
On the word bolmačï in Turkic Languages
This article analyzes the word bolmačï, which is rarely attested in Early Middle Turkic texts and has been overlooked by scholars until now. This word has multiple meanings, which ...

Back to Top