Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Новая книга Джу-Юп Ли «Тюркские народы в мировой истории»
View through CrossRef
The article is a review of the recently published book “The Turkic Peoples in World History” by Yoo-Yup Lee (Routledge, 2024, “Themes in World History” Series) which can be seen as an introduction to the history of the Turkic peoples and is addressed to both students and the general reader, as well as professionals, since the author’s approach to the topic is non-trivial, and the book contains many insights and interesting facts. Noting that Turkic peoples played an important role in the history of Eurasia as the creators of many empires (including the Mongol) and states, the author focuses on the history of separate Turkic peoples with a distinct identity and traces the transformation of these groups into the Turkic peoples of modern times. He emphasizes that in the pre-modern era, the Turkic peoples were not aware of their ethnolinguistic unity and did not call themselves Turks, having separate identities, and the process of expansion of the Turkic peoples (that is, their history) was accompanied by the Turkization of numerous non-Turkic-speaking groups and by processes of mixing and integration. Describing Turkic peoples based on their origins and identity, the author identifies four categories corresponding to the chapters of the book. These are the early Turkic peoples (Tiele, Türks and Uyghurs); peoples who appeared in the Eurasian steppe belt because of Turkic migrations (Qirghiz, Bulghars, Khazars, Qarakhanid Türks and Qipchaqs); the Oghuz Turkic peoples; the Turkic-Mongolian peoples (Chaghatay/Moghuls, Uzbeks, Qazaqs and Crimean Tatars). Specifically, the author calls the Qazaqs the direct descendants of the Jochid ulus, which was the result of amalgamation of Mongolian groups with non-Mongolian ones, and primarily with Turkic ones, in the Qipchaq steppe. The early Qazaqs and Shibanid Uzbeks had the same Chingizid-Mongol identity, but at the turn of the 16th century their paths diverged when the Qazaqs included the Moghul and Mangit nomads in their composition, and the Shibanid Uzbeks began to merge with the settled Iranian population of Central Asia. Genetically, modern Qazaqs (Kazakhs) are close to the Mongols. In general, the book shows the heterogeneous nature of the formation of most Turkic peoples of modernity and the Middle Ages
Title: Новая книга Джу-Юп Ли «Тюркские народы в мировой истории»
Description:
The article is a review of the recently published book “The Turkic Peoples in World History” by Yoo-Yup Lee (Routledge, 2024, “Themes in World History” Series) which can be seen as an introduction to the history of the Turkic peoples and is addressed to both students and the general reader, as well as professionals, since the author’s approach to the topic is non-trivial, and the book contains many insights and interesting facts.
Noting that Turkic peoples played an important role in the history of Eurasia as the creators of many empires (including the Mongol) and states, the author focuses on the history of separate Turkic peoples with a distinct identity and traces the transformation of these groups into the Turkic peoples of modern times.
He emphasizes that in the pre-modern era, the Turkic peoples were not aware of their ethnolinguistic unity and did not call themselves Turks, having separate identities, and the process of expansion of the Turkic peoples (that is, their history) was accompanied by the Turkization of numerous non-Turkic-speaking groups and by processes of mixing and integration.
Describing Turkic peoples based on their origins and identity, the author identifies four categories corresponding to the chapters of the book.
These are the early Turkic peoples (Tiele, Türks and Uyghurs); peoples who appeared in the Eurasian steppe belt because of Turkic migrations (Qirghiz, Bulghars, Khazars, Qarakhanid Türks and Qipchaqs); the Oghuz Turkic peoples; the Turkic-Mongolian peoples (Chaghatay/Moghuls, Uzbeks, Qazaqs and Crimean Tatars).
Specifically, the author calls the Qazaqs the direct descendants of the Jochid ulus, which was the result of amalgamation of Mongolian groups with non-Mongolian ones, and primarily with Turkic ones, in the Qipchaq steppe.
The early Qazaqs and Shibanid Uzbeks had the same Chingizid-Mongol identity, but at the turn of the 16th century their paths diverged when the Qazaqs included the Moghul and Mangit nomads in their composition, and the Shibanid Uzbeks began to merge with the settled Iranian population of Central Asia.
Genetically, modern Qazaqs (Kazakhs) are close to the Mongols.
In general, the book shows the heterogeneous nature of the formation of most Turkic peoples of modernity and the Middle Ages.
Related Results
Закавказский Фронт Во Второй Мировой Войне
Закавказский Фронт Во Второй Мировой Войне
Тема истории Второй Мировой войны и ее результатов вновь актуализировалась в связи с нарастающим стремлением современных великих держав произвести передел сфер влияния. Мировой пор...
СОВЕТСКО-КИТАЙСКИЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ В 1919-1924 ГГ.: ФОРМИРОВАНИЕ ДАЛЬНЕВОСТОЧНОГО УЗЛА ПРОТИВОРЕЧИЙ
СОВЕТСКО-КИТАЙСКИЕ ОТНОШЕНИЯ В 1919-1924 ГГ.: ФОРМИРОВАНИЕ ДАЛЬНЕВОСТОЧНОГО УЗЛА ПРОТИВОРЕЧИЙ
В статье исследуется важная и актуальная проблема - установление советско-китайских дипломатических связей и возникший в результате комплекс противоречий, оказавших непосредственно...
About Vasily Rozanov As a Publicist. Review on: «“Rozanov was not hypocritical, he was two-faced...”: Vasily Rozanov as Publicist and Polemicist» by Natalia Kazakova (Moscow, 2022)
About Vasily Rozanov As a Publicist. Review on: «“Rozanov was not hypocritical, he was two-faced...”: Vasily Rozanov as Publicist and Polemicist» by Natalia Kazakova (Moscow, 2022)
В эссе рассматривается последняя книга Н.Ю. Казаковой «“Розанов не был двуличен, он был двулик…”: Василий Розанов – публицист и полемист», вышедшая в 2022 г. в издательстве Российс...
Австрийский консерватизм конца XVIII – первой трети XIX в. в немецкоязычной историографии после 1945 г.
Австрийский консерватизм конца XVIII – первой трети XIX в. в немецкоязычной историографии после 1945 г.
Статья обращается к эволюции подходов и концепций в немецкоязычной историографии после 1945 г., получивших распространение при изучении австрийского консерватизма конца XVIII – пер...
Мировая экономика: ресурсное обеспечение меж-дународного бизнеса (воспроизводственный подход)
Мировая экономика: ресурсное обеспечение меж-дународного бизнеса (воспроизводственный подход)
В монографии рассмотрены методологические и научно-практические аспекты ресурсного обеспечения международного бизнеса, оперирующего в реальном секторе мировой экономики, в услови...
Philosophical “Field” of Confessionalization in Russia: Russian Religious Philosophy of the 19th Century Between “Official” Ecclesiality and Political Theologies
Philosophical “Field” of Confessionalization in Russia: Russian Religious Philosophy of the 19th Century Between “Official” Ecclesiality and Political Theologies
Статья посвящена исследованию истории русской религиозной философии XIX в. как части истории христианства в России. Возможность такой точки зрения обнаруживается при анализе критик...
PETER NIKOLAEVICH MILLER AND HIS ACTIVITY IN STUDYING THE HISTORY OF MOSCOW
PETER NIKOLAEVICH MILLER AND HIS ACTIVITY IN STUDYING THE HISTORY OF MOSCOW
Исследование посвящено профессиональной деятельности краеведа Москвы Петра Николаевича Миллера (1867–1943) и основано на документальных материа лах его личных фондов, хранящихся в ...
Patterns of history
Patterns of history
Эта статья посвящена осмыслению места истории в системе научного знания. Она включает в себя небольшое введение о научном наследии Михаила Абрамовича Барга, публикацию фрагмента из...

