Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strengths of Rotator Cuff and Glenoid Anchors: 2011 Update
View through CrossRef
Purpose
To evaluate the biomechanical and design characteristics of newer suture anchors.
Methods
Suture anchors were tested in fresh porcine metaphyseal cortex and cancellous troughs by use of an established protocol. A mechanical testing machine applied tensile loads parallel to the axis of insertion at 12.5 mm/s until failure, and mean anchor failure strengths were calculated. The mode of failure was recorded. Rotator cuff anchors tested included the Doubleplay and Opus SpeedScrew (ArthroCare Sports Medicine, Sunnyvale, CA); PEEK Intraline and PEEK Zip (Stryker, San Jose, CA); Paladin, SuperRevo FT, and CrossFT (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL); Piton (Tornier, Warsaw, IN); Ti Screw, ALLthread PEEK, LactoScrew, ALLthread Ti, and ALLthread PEEK knotless (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN). Glenoid anchors included the Gryphon BR P (DePuy‐Mitek, Raynham, MA) and JuggerKnot 1.4 (Biomet Sports Medicine).
Results
Mean cortical failure loads for cuff anchors were as follows: Doubleplay 5.0, 279 N; Doubleplay 6.5, 338 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.5, 336 N; PEEK Intraline 5.5, 263 N; PEEK Intraline 6.5, 344 N; PEEK Zip 5.5, 435 N; PEEK Zip 6.5, 502 N; Paladin 5.0, 500 N; Paladin 6.5, 521 N; SuperRevo FT, 496 N; CrossFT, 569 N; Piton, 379 N; Ti Screw 5.0, 457 N; Ti Screw 6.5, 443 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.5, 476 N; LactoScrew 5.5, 403 N; ALLthread Ti 5.0, 526 N; ALLthread Ti 6.5, 653 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 441 N). Mean cortical failure loads for glenoid anchors were 161 N for Gryphon BR P and 239 N for JuggerKnot 1.4. Mean cancellous bone failure loads for cuff anchors were Doubleplay 5.0, 263 N; Doubleplay 6.5, 340 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.5, 344 N; PEEK Intraline 5.5, 274 N; PEEK Intraline 6.5, 327 N; PEEK Zip 5.5, 401 N; PEEK Zip 6.5, 396 N; Paladin 5.0, 427 N; Paladin 6.5, 491 N; SuperRevo FT, 483 N; CrossFT, 547 N; Piton, 365 N; Ti Screw 5.0, 420 N; Ti Screw 6.5, 448 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.5, 475 N; LactoScrew 5.5, 435 N; ALLthread Ti 5.0, 512 N; ALLthread Ti 6.5, 612 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 466 N). Mean cancellous failure loads for glenoid anchors were 117 N for Gryphon BR P and 194 N for JuggerKnot 1.4. None of the anchors had pullout as the predominant failure mode. Eyelet failure was the predominant failure mode for Doubleplay, Opus SpeedScrew, PEEK Intraline, Gryphon BR P, ALLthread Ti 6.5, ALLthread PEEK 5.5, and LactoScrew.
Conclusions
Failure load was not dependent on anchor location (cancellous or cortical bone) (
P
= .58) but was dependent on anchor type (cuff anchor or glenoid anchor) (
P
< .001).
Clinical Relevance
Whereas larger fully threaded screw anchors designed for rotator cuff repair showed higher failure strengths than smaller non‐screw anchors designed for glenoid repairs (
P
< .05), the larger version of a screw anchor for a cuff repair did not provide a statistically greater failure load than the smaller screw anchor.
Title: Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strengths of Rotator Cuff and Glenoid Anchors: 2011 Update
Description:
Purpose
To evaluate the biomechanical and design characteristics of newer suture anchors.
Methods
Suture anchors were tested in fresh porcine metaphyseal cortex and cancellous troughs by use of an established protocol.
A mechanical testing machine applied tensile loads parallel to the axis of insertion at 12.
5 mm/s until failure, and mean anchor failure strengths were calculated.
The mode of failure was recorded.
Rotator cuff anchors tested included the Doubleplay and Opus SpeedScrew (ArthroCare Sports Medicine, Sunnyvale, CA); PEEK Intraline and PEEK Zip (Stryker, San Jose, CA); Paladin, SuperRevo FT, and CrossFT (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL); Piton (Tornier, Warsaw, IN); Ti Screw, ALLthread PEEK, LactoScrew, ALLthread Ti, and ALLthread PEEK knotless (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN).
Glenoid anchors included the Gryphon BR P (DePuy‐Mitek, Raynham, MA) and JuggerKnot 1.
4 (Biomet Sports Medicine).
Results
Mean cortical failure loads for cuff anchors were as follows: Doubleplay 5.
0, 279 N; Doubleplay 6.
5, 338 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.
5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.
5, 336 N; PEEK Intraline 5.
5, 263 N; PEEK Intraline 6.
5, 344 N; PEEK Zip 5.
5, 435 N; PEEK Zip 6.
5, 502 N; Paladin 5.
0, 500 N; Paladin 6.
5, 521 N; SuperRevo FT, 496 N; CrossFT, 569 N; Piton, 379 N; Ti Screw 5.
0, 457 N; Ti Screw 6.
5, 443 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.
5, 476 N; LactoScrew 5.
5, 403 N; ALLthread Ti 5.
0, 526 N; ALLthread Ti 6.
5, 653 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 441 N).
Mean cortical failure loads for glenoid anchors were 161 N for Gryphon BR P and 239 N for JuggerKnot 1.
4.
Mean cancellous bone failure loads for cuff anchors were Doubleplay 5.
0, 263 N; Doubleplay 6.
5, 340 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.
5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.
5, 344 N; PEEK Intraline 5.
5, 274 N; PEEK Intraline 6.
5, 327 N; PEEK Zip 5.
5, 401 N; PEEK Zip 6.
5, 396 N; Paladin 5.
0, 427 N; Paladin 6.
5, 491 N; SuperRevo FT, 483 N; CrossFT, 547 N; Piton, 365 N; Ti Screw 5.
0, 420 N; Ti Screw 6.
5, 448 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.
5, 475 N; LactoScrew 5.
5, 435 N; ALLthread Ti 5.
0, 512 N; ALLthread Ti 6.
5, 612 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 466 N).
Mean cancellous failure loads for glenoid anchors were 117 N for Gryphon BR P and 194 N for JuggerKnot 1.
4.
None of the anchors had pullout as the predominant failure mode.
Eyelet failure was the predominant failure mode for Doubleplay, Opus SpeedScrew, PEEK Intraline, Gryphon BR P, ALLthread Ti 6.
5, ALLthread PEEK 5.
5, and LactoScrew.
Conclusions
Failure load was not dependent on anchor location (cancellous or cortical bone) (
P
= .
58) but was dependent on anchor type (cuff anchor or glenoid anchor) (
P
< .
001).
Clinical Relevance
Whereas larger fully threaded screw anchors designed for rotator cuff repair showed higher failure strengths than smaller non‐screw anchors designed for glenoid repairs (
P
< .
05), the larger version of a screw anchor for a cuff repair did not provide a statistically greater failure load than the smaller screw anchor.
Related Results
Does fat infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles contribute to 8increased hidden blood loss (HBL) and other risk factors during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for rotator cuff injuries?
Does fat infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles contribute to 8increased hidden blood loss (HBL) and other risk factors during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for rotator cuff injuries?
Abstract
Objective
To compare hidden blood loss (HBL) among patients with rotator cuff injuries undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair who exhibit varying degr...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
A CLINICAL STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ALLARTHROSCOPIC ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
A CLINICAL STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ALLARTHROSCOPIC ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
Introduction: Rotator cuff tears are among the most common shoulder injuries and are usually accompanied by shoulder pain, disability and
dysfunction over the past decade rotator c...
Assessment of rotator cuff tears among bodybuilders in Lahore
Assessment of rotator cuff tears among bodybuilders in Lahore
Background: The current was performed on bodybuilders to see the shoulder rotator cuff injuries among them. A bodybuilder is a person who strengthens and enlarges the muscles of th...
Arthroscopic cuff repair: footprint remnant preserving versus debriding rotator cuff repair of transtendinous rotator cuff tears with remnant cuff
Arthroscopic cuff repair: footprint remnant preserving versus debriding rotator cuff repair of transtendinous rotator cuff tears with remnant cuff
Abstract
Background
In transtendinous full thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCT) with remnant cuff, conventionally, cuff remnant of the greater tuber...
Traumatic Inferior Shoulder Dislocation with Posterior Cord Brachial Plexopathy: A Case Report
Traumatic Inferior Shoulder Dislocation with Posterior Cord Brachial Plexopathy: A Case Report
Introduction: Inferior glenohumeral dislocations are rare injuries, comprising <1% of shoulder dislocations. While their presentation is rare, these injuries commonly result in ...
Rotator Cuff Repair: The Compression SpeedBridge Technique
Rotator Cuff Repair: The Compression SpeedBridge Technique
Background:
While rotator cuff repair has generally produced good to excellent outcomes, re-tear rates remain variable, with rates ranging from 20% to 50%. The ...
Exploring Recent Advancements in Rotator Cuff Injury Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review
Exploring Recent Advancements in Rotator Cuff Injury Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review
Rotator cuff injuries are prevalent musculoskeletal injuries that may impair quality of life and function. This narrative review covers current rotator cuff injury rehabilitation b...

