Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strengths of Rotator Cuff and Glenoid Anchors: 2011 Update

View through CrossRef
Purpose To evaluate the biomechanical and design characteristics of newer suture anchors. Methods Suture anchors were tested in fresh porcine metaphyseal cortex and cancellous troughs by use of an established protocol. A mechanical testing machine applied tensile loads parallel to the axis of insertion at 12.5 mm/s until failure, and mean anchor failure strengths were calculated. The mode of failure was recorded. Rotator cuff anchors tested included the Doubleplay and Opus SpeedScrew (ArthroCare Sports Medicine, Sunnyvale, CA); PEEK Intraline and PEEK Zip (Stryker, San Jose, CA); Paladin, SuperRevo FT, and CrossFT (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL); Piton (Tornier, Warsaw, IN); Ti Screw, ALLthread PEEK, LactoScrew, ALLthread Ti, and ALLthread PEEK knotless (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN). Glenoid anchors included the Gryphon BR P (DePuy‐Mitek, Raynham, MA) and JuggerKnot 1.4 (Biomet Sports Medicine). Results Mean cortical failure loads for cuff anchors were as follows: Doubleplay 5.0, 279 N; Doubleplay 6.5, 338 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.5, 336 N; PEEK Intraline 5.5, 263 N; PEEK Intraline 6.5, 344 N; PEEK Zip 5.5, 435 N; PEEK Zip 6.5, 502 N; Paladin 5.0, 500 N; Paladin 6.5, 521 N; SuperRevo FT, 496 N; CrossFT, 569 N; Piton, 379 N; Ti Screw 5.0, 457 N; Ti Screw 6.5, 443 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.5, 476 N; LactoScrew 5.5, 403 N; ALLthread Ti 5.0, 526 N; ALLthread Ti 6.5, 653 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 441 N). Mean cortical failure loads for glenoid anchors were 161 N for Gryphon BR P and 239 N for JuggerKnot 1.4. Mean cancellous bone failure loads for cuff anchors were Doubleplay 5.0, 263 N; Doubleplay 6.5, 340 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.5, 344 N; PEEK Intraline 5.5, 274 N; PEEK Intraline 6.5, 327 N; PEEK Zip 5.5, 401 N; PEEK Zip 6.5, 396 N; Paladin 5.0, 427 N; Paladin 6.5, 491 N; SuperRevo FT, 483 N; CrossFT, 547 N; Piton, 365 N; Ti Screw 5.0, 420 N; Ti Screw 6.5, 448 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.5, 475 N; LactoScrew 5.5, 435 N; ALLthread Ti 5.0, 512 N; ALLthread Ti 6.5, 612 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 466 N). Mean cancellous failure loads for glenoid anchors were 117 N for Gryphon BR P and 194 N for JuggerKnot 1.4. None of the anchors had pullout as the predominant failure mode. Eyelet failure was the predominant failure mode for Doubleplay, Opus SpeedScrew, PEEK Intraline, Gryphon BR P, ALLthread Ti 6.5, ALLthread PEEK 5.5, and LactoScrew. Conclusions Failure load was not dependent on anchor location (cancellous or cortical bone) ( P = .58) but was dependent on anchor type (cuff anchor or glenoid anchor) ( P < .001). Clinical Relevance Whereas larger fully threaded screw anchors designed for rotator cuff repair showed higher failure strengths than smaller non‐screw anchors designed for glenoid repairs ( P < .05), the larger version of a screw anchor for a cuff repair did not provide a statistically greater failure load than the smaller screw anchor.
Title: Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strengths of Rotator Cuff and Glenoid Anchors: 2011 Update
Description:
Purpose To evaluate the biomechanical and design characteristics of newer suture anchors.
Methods Suture anchors were tested in fresh porcine metaphyseal cortex and cancellous troughs by use of an established protocol.
A mechanical testing machine applied tensile loads parallel to the axis of insertion at 12.
5 mm/s until failure, and mean anchor failure strengths were calculated.
The mode of failure was recorded.
Rotator cuff anchors tested included the Doubleplay and Opus SpeedScrew (ArthroCare Sports Medicine, Sunnyvale, CA); PEEK Intraline and PEEK Zip (Stryker, San Jose, CA); Paladin, SuperRevo FT, and CrossFT (ConMed Linvatec, Largo, FL); Piton (Tornier, Warsaw, IN); Ti Screw, ALLthread PEEK, LactoScrew, ALLthread Ti, and ALLthread PEEK knotless (Biomet Sports Medicine, Warsaw, IN).
Glenoid anchors included the Gryphon BR P (DePuy‐Mitek, Raynham, MA) and JuggerKnot 1.
4 (Biomet Sports Medicine).
Results Mean cortical failure loads for cuff anchors were as follows: Doubleplay 5.
0, 279 N; Doubleplay 6.
5, 338 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.
5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.
5, 336 N; PEEK Intraline 5.
5, 263 N; PEEK Intraline 6.
5, 344 N; PEEK Zip 5.
5, 435 N; PEEK Zip 6.
5, 502 N; Paladin 5.
0, 500 N; Paladin 6.
5, 521 N; SuperRevo FT, 496 N; CrossFT, 569 N; Piton, 379 N; Ti Screw 5.
0, 457 N; Ti Screw 6.
5, 443 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.
5, 476 N; LactoScrew 5.
5, 403 N; ALLthread Ti 5.
0, 526 N; ALLthread Ti 6.
5, 653 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 441 N).
Mean cortical failure loads for glenoid anchors were 161 N for Gryphon BR P and 239 N for JuggerKnot 1.
4.
Mean cancellous bone failure loads for cuff anchors were Doubleplay 5.
0, 263 N; Doubleplay 6.
5, 340 N; Opus SpeedScrew 5.
5, 356 N; Opus SpeedScrew 6.
5, 344 N; PEEK Intraline 5.
5, 274 N; PEEK Intraline 6.
5, 327 N; PEEK Zip 5.
5, 401 N; PEEK Zip 6.
5, 396 N; Paladin 5.
0, 427 N; Paladin 6.
5, 491 N; SuperRevo FT, 483 N; CrossFT, 547 N; Piton, 365 N; Ti Screw 5.
0, 420 N; Ti Screw 6.
5, 448 N; ALLthread PEEK 5.
5, 475 N; LactoScrew 5.
5, 435 N; ALLthread Ti 5.
0, 512 N; ALLthread Ti 6.
5, 612 N; and ALLthread PEEK knotless, 466 N).
Mean cancellous failure loads for glenoid anchors were 117 N for Gryphon BR P and 194 N for JuggerKnot 1.
4.
None of the anchors had pullout as the predominant failure mode.
Eyelet failure was the predominant failure mode for Doubleplay, Opus SpeedScrew, PEEK Intraline, Gryphon BR P, ALLthread Ti 6.
5, ALLthread PEEK 5.
5, and LactoScrew.
Conclusions Failure load was not dependent on anchor location (cancellous or cortical bone) ( P = .
58) but was dependent on anchor type (cuff anchor or glenoid anchor) ( P < .
001).
Clinical Relevance Whereas larger fully threaded screw anchors designed for rotator cuff repair showed higher failure strengths than smaller non‐screw anchors designed for glenoid repairs ( P < .
05), the larger version of a screw anchor for a cuff repair did not provide a statistically greater failure load than the smaller screw anchor.

Related Results

Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
A CLINICAL STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ALLARTHROSCOPIC ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
A CLINICAL STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ALLARTHROSCOPIC ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
Introduction: Rotator cuff tears are among the most common shoulder injuries and are usually accompanied by shoulder pain, disability and dysfunction over the past decade rotator c...
Assessment of rotator cuff tears among bodybuilders in Lahore
Assessment of rotator cuff tears among bodybuilders in Lahore
Background: The current was performed on bodybuilders to see the shoulder rotator cuff injuries among them. A bodybuilder is a person who strengthens and enlarges the muscles of th...
Traumatic Inferior Shoulder Dislocation with Posterior Cord Brachial Plexopathy: A Case Report
Traumatic Inferior Shoulder Dislocation with Posterior Cord Brachial Plexopathy: A Case Report
Introduction: Inferior glenohumeral dislocations are rare injuries, comprising <1% of shoulder dislocations. While their presentation is rare, these injuries commonly result in ...
Rotator Cuff Repair: The Compression SpeedBridge Technique
Rotator Cuff Repair: The Compression SpeedBridge Technique
Background: While rotator cuff repair has generally produced good to excellent outcomes, re-tear rates remain variable, with rates ranging from 20% to 50%. The ...
Exploring Recent Advancements in Rotator Cuff Injury Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review
Exploring Recent Advancements in Rotator Cuff Injury Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review
Rotator cuff injuries are prevalent musculoskeletal injuries that may impair quality of life and function. This narrative review covers current rotator cuff injury rehabilitation b...

Back to Top