Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Arthroscopic cuff repair: footprint remnant preserving versus debriding rotator cuff repair of transtendinous rotator cuff tears with remnant cuff

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background In transtendinous full thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCT) with remnant cuff, conventionally, cuff remnant of the greater tuberosity (GT) is debrided for better tendon to bone healing. However, larger cuff defect caused overtension on the repaired tendon. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and tendon integrity between remnant preserving and remnant debriding cuff repairs in the transtendinous FTRCT with remnant cuff. Methods From March, 2012 to October, 2017, a total of 127 patients who had the transtendinous FTRCT with remnant cuff were enrolled in this study. Rotator cuff tears were repaired arthroscopically, with patients divided into two groups: group I (n = 63), where rotator cuff remnants were preserved during the repair, and group II (n = 64), where the remnants were debrided during the repair. Clinical outcomes were assessed at the last follow-up (minimum 2 years) using the UCLA score, ASES score, SST score, Constant Shoulder score, and range of motion (ROM). The analysis of structural integrity and tendon quality was performed using the Sugaya classification on postoperative MRI scans at 8 months after surgery. Results At the final follow-up, UCLA, ASES, SST, and CS scores significantly improved from preoperative values to postoperative (all p < 0.05): UCLA (I: 19.6 ± 6.0 to 31.7 ± 3.2, II: 18.0 ± 5.7 to 31.5 ± 3.2), ASES (I: 54.3 ± 10.7 to 86.5 ± 12.5, II: 18.0 ± 5.7 to 85.8 ± 12.4), SST (I: 5.6 ± 2.8 to 10.2 ± 2.0, II: 5.0 ± 2.9 to 10.1 ± 2.5), CS (I: 74.0 ± 17.2 to 87.8 ± 9.7, II: 62.0 ± 19.2 to 88.3 ± 6.2). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). Also, remnant preserving cuff repair yielded significantly better tendon quality on postoperative MRI (p < 0.05). The incidence of re-tear (Sugaya’s Type IV and V) was not significantly different between the two groups (I:17% vs. II:19%; p = 0.053). Conclusions Remnant preserving rotator cuff repairs, which facilitate tendon-to-tendon healing, are superior in terms of tendon quality and are the preferred option for transtendinous FTRCT. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
Title: Arthroscopic cuff repair: footprint remnant preserving versus debriding rotator cuff repair of transtendinous rotator cuff tears with remnant cuff
Description:
Abstract Background In transtendinous full thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCT) with remnant cuff, conventionally, cuff remnant of the greater tuberosity (GT) is debrided for better tendon to bone healing.
However, larger cuff defect caused overtension on the repaired tendon.
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and tendon integrity between remnant preserving and remnant debriding cuff repairs in the transtendinous FTRCT with remnant cuff.
Methods From March, 2012 to October, 2017, a total of 127 patients who had the transtendinous FTRCT with remnant cuff were enrolled in this study.
Rotator cuff tears were repaired arthroscopically, with patients divided into two groups: group I (n = 63), where rotator cuff remnants were preserved during the repair, and group II (n = 64), where the remnants were debrided during the repair.
Clinical outcomes were assessed at the last follow-up (minimum 2 years) using the UCLA score, ASES score, SST score, Constant Shoulder score, and range of motion (ROM).
The analysis of structural integrity and tendon quality was performed using the Sugaya classification on postoperative MRI scans at 8 months after surgery.
Results At the final follow-up, UCLA, ASES, SST, and CS scores significantly improved from preoperative values to postoperative (all p < 0.
05): UCLA (I: 19.
6 ± 6.
0 to 31.
7 ± 3.
2, II: 18.
0 ± 5.
7 to 31.
5 ± 3.
2), ASES (I: 54.
3 ± 10.
7 to 86.
5 ± 12.
5, II: 18.
0 ± 5.
7 to 85.
8 ± 12.
4), SST (I: 5.
6 ± 2.
8 to 10.
2 ± 2.
0, II: 5.
0 ± 2.
9 to 10.
1 ± 2.
5), CS (I: 74.
0 ± 17.
2 to 87.
8 ± 9.
7, II: 62.
0 ± 19.
2 to 88.
3 ± 6.
2).
However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.
05).
Also, remnant preserving cuff repair yielded significantly better tendon quality on postoperative MRI (p < 0.
05).
The incidence of re-tear (Sugaya’s Type IV and V) was not significantly different between the two groups (I:17% vs.
II:19%; p = 0.
053).
Conclusions Remnant preserving rotator cuff repairs, which facilitate tendon-to-tendon healing, are superior in terms of tendon quality and are the preferred option for transtendinous FTRCT.
Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Related Results

A CLINICAL STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ALLARTHROSCOPIC ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
A CLINICAL STUDY OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF ALLARTHROSCOPIC ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
Introduction: Rotator cuff tears are among the most common shoulder injuries and are usually accompanied by shoulder pain, disability and dysfunction over the past decade rotator c...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Rotator Cuff Repair: The Compression SpeedBridge Technique
Rotator Cuff Repair: The Compression SpeedBridge Technique
Background: While rotator cuff repair has generally produced good to excellent outcomes, re-tear rates remain variable, with rates ranging from 20% to 50%. The ...
Remnant Tendon Preservation Enhances Rotator Cuff Healing: Remnant Preserving Versus Removal in a Rabbit Model
Remnant Tendon Preservation Enhances Rotator Cuff Healing: Remnant Preserving Versus Removal in a Rabbit Model
Purpose To assess whether anatomic repair preserving remnant tendon tissue can enhance tendon‐to‐bone healing biomechanically and histologically in a rabbit rot...
arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: transosseouss versus anchor technique
arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: transosseouss versus anchor technique
Aim to compare clinical outcomes of arthroscopic anchor repair of rotator cuff muscles of shoulders versus shoulders treated with arthroscopic trans-osseous bon...

Back to Top