Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological clinical trials

View through CrossRef
Introduction In ophthalmology, clinical trials (CTs) guide the treatment of diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, myopia, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma and keratoconus with distinct presentations, pathological characteristics and responses to treatment in minority populations. Reporting gender and race and ethnicity in healthcare studies is currently recommended by National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines to ensure representativeness and generalisability; however, CT results that include this information have been limited in the past 30 years. The objective of this review is to analyse the sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological phases III and IV CT based on publicly available data. Methods This study included phases III and IV complete ophthalmological CT available from clinicaltrials.org, and describes the country distribution, race and ethnicity description and gender, and funding characteristics. Results After a screening process, we included 654 CTs, with findings that corroborate the previous CT reviews’ findings that most ophthalmological participants are white and from high-income countries. A description of race and ethnicity is reported in 37.1% of studies but less frequently included within the most studied ophthalmological specialty area (cornea, retina, glaucoma and cataracts). The incidence of race and ethnicity reporting has improved during the past 7 years. Discussion Although NIH and FDA promote guidelines to improve generalisability in healthcare studies, the inclusion of race and ethnicity in publications and diverse participants in ophthalmological CT is still limited. Actions from the research community and related stakeholders are necessary to increase representativeness and guarantee generalisability in ophthalmological research results to optimise care and reduce related healthcare disparities.
Title: Sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological clinical trials
Description:
Introduction In ophthalmology, clinical trials (CTs) guide the treatment of diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, myopia, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma and keratoconus with distinct presentations, pathological characteristics and responses to treatment in minority populations.
Reporting gender and race and ethnicity in healthcare studies is currently recommended by National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines to ensure representativeness and generalisability; however, CT results that include this information have been limited in the past 30 years.
The objective of this review is to analyse the sociodemographic disparities in ophthalmological phases III and IV CT based on publicly available data.
Methods This study included phases III and IV complete ophthalmological CT available from clinicaltrials.
org, and describes the country distribution, race and ethnicity description and gender, and funding characteristics.
Results After a screening process, we included 654 CTs, with findings that corroborate the previous CT reviews’ findings that most ophthalmological participants are white and from high-income countries.
A description of race and ethnicity is reported in 37.
1% of studies but less frequently included within the most studied ophthalmological specialty area (cornea, retina, glaucoma and cataracts).
The incidence of race and ethnicity reporting has improved during the past 7 years.
Discussion Although NIH and FDA promote guidelines to improve generalisability in healthcare studies, the inclusion of race and ethnicity in publications and diverse participants in ophthalmological CT is still limited.
Actions from the research community and related stakeholders are necessary to increase representativeness and guarantee generalisability in ophthalmological research results to optimise care and reduce related healthcare disparities.

Related Results

Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
4552 Pediatrician Readiness to Participate in Clinical Trials: Roles of interest, barriers and interventions
4552 Pediatrician Readiness to Participate in Clinical Trials: Roles of interest, barriers and interventions
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Clinical trials are the gold standard for developing evidence-based medicine. However, 20% of pediatric randomized clinical trials are discontinued and about 30% ...
Rotavirus vaccine clinical trials: a cross-sectional analysis of clinical trials registries
Rotavirus vaccine clinical trials: a cross-sectional analysis of clinical trials registries
Abstract Background Rotavirus is a primary infectious virus causing childhood diarrhoea and is associated with significant mortality in children. Th...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Clinical trials for predictive medicine: new challenges and paradigms
Clinical trials for predictive medicine: new challenges and paradigms
Background Developments in biotechnology and genomics have increased the focus of biostatisticians on prediction problems. This has led to many exciting developments for predictive...

Back to Top