Javascript must be enabled to continue!
4552 Pediatrician Readiness to Participate in Clinical Trials: Roles of interest, barriers and interventions
View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Clinical trials are the gold standard for developing evidence-based medicine. However, 20% of pediatric randomized clinical trials are discontinued and about 30% of completed trials go unpublished. (Pica and Bourgeois, 2016) Although patient recruitment is the most cited barrier to completing clinical trials, trials funded by academia are more likely discontinued compared to those funded by industry. This study is an attempt to gain additional insights into clinical trials in academic pediatrics. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Junior pediatrics faculty (Instructors and Assistant Professors) were recruited to participate in an online survey through RedCAP. The physicians were asked if they had prior experiences with clinical trials and whether they have interest in participating in clinical trials. Those interested were asked three additional questions: what role they were interested in, barriers to participating and interventions they thought would educate them about participating in clinical trials. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Ninety two (92) out of 119 (77%) junior pediatrics faculty completed the survey. Twenty (20) pediatric subspecialties were represented and respondents were on various academic pathways. A third of the respondents (35%) had previously participated in clinical trials. A majority of the faculty respondents (84; 70%) are on the clinical educator pathway. The 13 respondents who were not interested in clinical trials indicated their preference for patient care, education and quality improvement. Of those interested in clinical trials, the top three preferred roles were site co-investigator (68%), help designing future protocol (47%) and site principal investigator (44%). Other than time, the top barriers to participation were a lack of awareness of what it takes to lead or engage in clinical trials (53%) and a lack of training on clinical trials (45%). Mentoring from an experienced clinical trialist emerged as the top preferred intervention (78%). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Although limited to one institution, the findings of this study provide insights into pediatric faculty interest in clinical trials. If academic pediatricians are provided with mentoring, there could be an uptick in completed and published clinical trials involving pediatric populations.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: 4552 Pediatrician Readiness to Participate in Clinical Trials: Roles of interest, barriers and interventions
Description:
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Clinical trials are the gold standard for developing evidence-based medicine.
However, 20% of pediatric randomized clinical trials are discontinued and about 30% of completed trials go unpublished.
(Pica and Bourgeois, 2016) Although patient recruitment is the most cited barrier to completing clinical trials, trials funded by academia are more likely discontinued compared to those funded by industry.
This study is an attempt to gain additional insights into clinical trials in academic pediatrics.
METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Junior pediatrics faculty (Instructors and Assistant Professors) were recruited to participate in an online survey through RedCAP.
The physicians were asked if they had prior experiences with clinical trials and whether they have interest in participating in clinical trials.
Those interested were asked three additional questions: what role they were interested in, barriers to participating and interventions they thought would educate them about participating in clinical trials.
RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Ninety two (92) out of 119 (77%) junior pediatrics faculty completed the survey.
Twenty (20) pediatric subspecialties were represented and respondents were on various academic pathways.
A third of the respondents (35%) had previously participated in clinical trials.
A majority of the faculty respondents (84; 70%) are on the clinical educator pathway.
The 13 respondents who were not interested in clinical trials indicated their preference for patient care, education and quality improvement.
Of those interested in clinical trials, the top three preferred roles were site co-investigator (68%), help designing future protocol (47%) and site principal investigator (44%).
Other than time, the top barriers to participation were a lack of awareness of what it takes to lead or engage in clinical trials (53%) and a lack of training on clinical trials (45%).
Mentoring from an experienced clinical trialist emerged as the top preferred intervention (78%).
DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Although limited to one institution, the findings of this study provide insights into pediatric faculty interest in clinical trials.
If academic pediatricians are provided with mentoring, there could be an uptick in completed and published clinical trials involving pediatric populations.
Related Results
Digital Mental Health Landscaping in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Digital Mental Health Landscaping in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Introduction
The aim of this project was to map the landscape of who is doing what and where in digital mental health, and to pr...
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction
As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Global Distribution and Characteristics of Research Facilities Participating in Phase III Oncology Trials
Global Distribution and Characteristics of Research Facilities Participating in Phase III Oncology Trials
ABSTRACT
Background
Research infra-structure is essential for conducting phase III cancer clinical trials as its lack precludes...
Benchmarking Industry 4.0 readiness evaluation using fuzzy approaches
Benchmarking Industry 4.0 readiness evaluation using fuzzy approaches
PurposeThe purpose is to assess Industry 4.0 (I4.0) readiness index using fuzzy logic and multi-grade fuzzy approaches in an automotive component manufacturing organization.Design/...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Workforce, economic, and infrastructural barriers to global oncology clinical trial participation: Focus on sub-Saharan Africa.
Workforce, economic, and infrastructural barriers to global oncology clinical trial participation: Focus on sub-Saharan Africa.
11091
Background:
Despite Sub-Saharan Africa's (SSA) growing cancer burden, the region remains grossly underrepresented in global onco...
“to Represent a Black Point of View”: Willingness of Black Persons with Multiple Myeloma to Participate in Clinical Trials
“to Represent a Black Point of View”: Willingness of Black Persons with Multiple Myeloma to Participate in Clinical Trials
Background
Cancer clinical trials are essential for advancing scientific knowledge and improving patient-centered clinical outcomes, but racial-ethnic diversity is o...
1349. Lesson Learned from Investigators of Clinical Trials to Identify Therapeutics for COVID-19: Qualitative Study
1349. Lesson Learned from Investigators of Clinical Trials to Identify Therapeutics for COVID-19: Qualitative Study
Abstract
Background
Implementation of high-quality clinical trials especially early in the pandemic caused burden on clinical in...

