Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Workforce, economic, and infrastructural barriers to global oncology clinical trial participation: Focus on sub-Saharan Africa.

View through CrossRef
11091 Background: Despite Sub-Saharan Africa's (SSA) growing cancer burden, the region remains grossly underrepresented in global oncology clinical trials. With only 109 open trials identified continent-wide in 2019 compared to 7,557 in the United States, this disparity highlights systemic barriers. As well, the unique genetic variations in the African pan-genome makes a strong case for urgent population-specific research. Methods: Using the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, we identified 151 oncology trials across 255 continent-wide recruitment sites. A review of published literature was carried out to assess oncologist distribution and SDI index within highlighted countries hosting clinical trials in SSA. Results: Of the 1,759 clinical oncologists identified in SSA, Egypt accounts for 85.2% (n=1,500) and hosts 46.36% of all oncology trials (n=70). Kenya, with only 0.34% oncologists (n=6), contributes 17.88% of clinical trials (n=27). Nigeria, with 3.63% oncologists (n=64), hosts 11.26% of trials (n=17). Ethiopia and Tanzania each house 0.34% oncologists (n=6), yet Ethiopia conducts 7.95% (n=12) and Tanzania 3.97% (n=6) of trials. South Africa, with 2.27% oncologists (n=40), hosts 3.97% of trials (n=6). Other countries, including Ghana and Morocco, collectively contribute to 8.61% of trials (n=13) with varying oncologist representation. The few available trials are mostly concentrated in Egypt, Kenya, and Nigeria. In addition, most trials disproportionately focus on breast and cervical cancer, with the added challenge of limited oncologist distribution. Infrastructure deficits, financial constraints, and cultural barriers further impede trial initiation and participation. Conclusions: Access to clinical trials remains a pillar of high-quality cancer care. Oncology research in SSA is hindered by multifaceted barriers, limiting the development of effective, region-specific therapies. Strategies to address these barriers include investing in the training of healthcare professionals, providing adequate infrastructure, increasing funding through public-private partnerships, and enhancing community engagement to build trust and improve trial participation. Distribution of clinical oncologists, oncology trials, and SDI index across selected African countries. African Countries with Oncology Clinical Trials Number of Clinical Oncologists in AfricaN=1759 % of Clinical Oncologists in Africa by Country Number of Clinical Trials in Africa by Country % of Clinical Trials in Africa by Country SDI Index Egypt 1500 85.2% 70 46.36% Middle Kenya 6 0.34% 27 17.88% Low-Middle Nigeria 64 3.63% 17 11.26% Low-Middle Ethiopia 6 0.34% 12 7.95% Low South Africa 40 2.27% 6 3.97% Middle Tanzania 6 0.34% 6 3.97% Low-Middle Ghana 10 0.57% 5 3.31% Low-Middle Morocco 28 1.59% 1 0.66% Low-Middle Others 99 5.63% 7 4.64% Total 1759 100% 151 100%
Title: Workforce, economic, and infrastructural barriers to global oncology clinical trial participation: Focus on sub-Saharan Africa.
Description:
11091 Background: Despite Sub-Saharan Africa's (SSA) growing cancer burden, the region remains grossly underrepresented in global oncology clinical trials.
With only 109 open trials identified continent-wide in 2019 compared to 7,557 in the United States, this disparity highlights systemic barriers.
As well, the unique genetic variations in the African pan-genome makes a strong case for urgent population-specific research.
Methods: Using the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, we identified 151 oncology trials across 255 continent-wide recruitment sites.
A review of published literature was carried out to assess oncologist distribution and SDI index within highlighted countries hosting clinical trials in SSA.
Results: Of the 1,759 clinical oncologists identified in SSA, Egypt accounts for 85.
2% (n=1,500) and hosts 46.
36% of all oncology trials (n=70).
Kenya, with only 0.
34% oncologists (n=6), contributes 17.
88% of clinical trials (n=27).
Nigeria, with 3.
63% oncologists (n=64), hosts 11.
26% of trials (n=17).
Ethiopia and Tanzania each house 0.
34% oncologists (n=6), yet Ethiopia conducts 7.
95% (n=12) and Tanzania 3.
97% (n=6) of trials.
South Africa, with 2.
27% oncologists (n=40), hosts 3.
97% of trials (n=6).
Other countries, including Ghana and Morocco, collectively contribute to 8.
61% of trials (n=13) with varying oncologist representation.
The few available trials are mostly concentrated in Egypt, Kenya, and Nigeria.
In addition, most trials disproportionately focus on breast and cervical cancer, with the added challenge of limited oncologist distribution.
Infrastructure deficits, financial constraints, and cultural barriers further impede trial initiation and participation.
Conclusions: Access to clinical trials remains a pillar of high-quality cancer care.
Oncology research in SSA is hindered by multifaceted barriers, limiting the development of effective, region-specific therapies.
Strategies to address these barriers include investing in the training of healthcare professionals, providing adequate infrastructure, increasing funding through public-private partnerships, and enhancing community engagement to build trust and improve trial participation.
Distribution of clinical oncologists, oncology trials, and SDI index across selected African countries.
African Countries with Oncology Clinical Trials Number of Clinical Oncologists in AfricaN=1759 % of Clinical Oncologists in Africa by Country Number of Clinical Trials in Africa by Country % of Clinical Trials in Africa by Country SDI Index Egypt 1500 85.
2% 70 46.
36% Middle Kenya 6 0.
34% 27 17.
88% Low-Middle Nigeria 64 3.
63% 17 11.
26% Low-Middle Ethiopia 6 0.
34% 12 7.
95% Low South Africa 40 2.
27% 6 3.
97% Middle Tanzania 6 0.
34% 6 3.
97% Low-Middle Ghana 10 0.
57% 5 3.
31% Low-Middle Morocco 28 1.
59% 1 0.
66% Low-Middle Others 99 5.
63% 7 4.
64% Total 1759 100% 151 100%.

Related Results

Scholarly publishing in sub-Saharan Africa in the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities
Scholarly publishing in sub-Saharan Africa in the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities
A free flow of ideas and information is vital to the process of scientific inquiry, and in turn to the ability to address economic, environmental and social development issues both...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Afrikanske smede
Afrikanske smede
African Smiths Cultural-historical and sociological problems illuminated by studies among the Tuareg and by comparative analysisIn KUML 1957 in connection with a description of sla...
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...

Back to Top