Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Workforce, economic, and infrastructural barriers to global oncology clinical trial participation: Focus on sub-Saharan Africa.
View through CrossRef
11091
Background:
Despite Sub-Saharan Africa's (SSA) growing cancer burden, the region remains grossly underrepresented in global oncology clinical trials. With only 109 open trials identified continent-wide in 2019 compared to 7,557 in the United States, this disparity highlights systemic barriers. As well, the unique genetic variations in the African pan-genome makes a strong case for urgent population-specific research.
Methods:
Using the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, we identified 151 oncology trials across 255 continent-wide recruitment sites. A review of published literature was carried out to assess oncologist distribution and SDI index within highlighted countries hosting clinical trials in SSA.
Results:
Of the 1,759 clinical oncologists identified in SSA, Egypt accounts for 85.2% (n=1,500) and hosts 46.36% of all oncology trials (n=70). Kenya, with only 0.34% oncologists (n=6), contributes 17.88% of clinical trials (n=27). Nigeria, with 3.63% oncologists (n=64), hosts 11.26% of trials (n=17). Ethiopia and Tanzania each house 0.34% oncologists (n=6), yet Ethiopia conducts 7.95% (n=12) and Tanzania 3.97% (n=6) of trials. South Africa, with 2.27% oncologists (n=40), hosts 3.97% of trials (n=6). Other countries, including Ghana and Morocco, collectively contribute to 8.61% of trials (n=13) with varying oncologist representation. The few available trials are mostly concentrated in Egypt, Kenya, and Nigeria. In addition, most trials disproportionately focus on breast and cervical cancer, with the added challenge of limited oncologist distribution. Infrastructure deficits, financial constraints, and cultural barriers further impede trial initiation and participation.
Conclusions:
Access to clinical trials remains a pillar of high-quality cancer care. Oncology research in SSA is hindered by multifaceted barriers, limiting the development of effective, region-specific therapies. Strategies to address these barriers include investing in the training of healthcare professionals, providing adequate infrastructure, increasing funding through public-private partnerships, and enhancing community engagement to build trust and improve trial participation.
Distribution of clinical oncologists, oncology trials, and SDI index across selected African countries.
African Countries with Oncology Clinical Trials
Number of Clinical Oncologists in AfricaN=1759
% of Clinical Oncologists in Africa by Country
Number of Clinical Trials in Africa by Country
% of Clinical Trials in Africa by Country
SDI Index
Egypt
1500
85.2%
70
46.36%
Middle
Kenya
6
0.34%
27
17.88%
Low-Middle
Nigeria
64
3.63%
17
11.26%
Low-Middle
Ethiopia
6
0.34%
12
7.95%
Low
South Africa
40
2.27%
6
3.97%
Middle
Tanzania
6
0.34%
6
3.97%
Low-Middle
Ghana
10
0.57%
5
3.31%
Low-Middle
Morocco
28
1.59%
1
0.66%
Low-Middle
Others
99
5.63%
7
4.64%
Total
1759
100%
151
100%
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Workforce, economic, and infrastructural barriers to global oncology clinical trial participation: Focus on sub-Saharan Africa.
Description:
11091
Background:
Despite Sub-Saharan Africa's (SSA) growing cancer burden, the region remains grossly underrepresented in global oncology clinical trials.
With only 109 open trials identified continent-wide in 2019 compared to 7,557 in the United States, this disparity highlights systemic barriers.
As well, the unique genetic variations in the African pan-genome makes a strong case for urgent population-specific research.
Methods:
Using the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, we identified 151 oncology trials across 255 continent-wide recruitment sites.
A review of published literature was carried out to assess oncologist distribution and SDI index within highlighted countries hosting clinical trials in SSA.
Results:
Of the 1,759 clinical oncologists identified in SSA, Egypt accounts for 85.
2% (n=1,500) and hosts 46.
36% of all oncology trials (n=70).
Kenya, with only 0.
34% oncologists (n=6), contributes 17.
88% of clinical trials (n=27).
Nigeria, with 3.
63% oncologists (n=64), hosts 11.
26% of trials (n=17).
Ethiopia and Tanzania each house 0.
34% oncologists (n=6), yet Ethiopia conducts 7.
95% (n=12) and Tanzania 3.
97% (n=6) of trials.
South Africa, with 2.
27% oncologists (n=40), hosts 3.
97% of trials (n=6).
Other countries, including Ghana and Morocco, collectively contribute to 8.
61% of trials (n=13) with varying oncologist representation.
The few available trials are mostly concentrated in Egypt, Kenya, and Nigeria.
In addition, most trials disproportionately focus on breast and cervical cancer, with the added challenge of limited oncologist distribution.
Infrastructure deficits, financial constraints, and cultural barriers further impede trial initiation and participation.
Conclusions:
Access to clinical trials remains a pillar of high-quality cancer care.
Oncology research in SSA is hindered by multifaceted barriers, limiting the development of effective, region-specific therapies.
Strategies to address these barriers include investing in the training of healthcare professionals, providing adequate infrastructure, increasing funding through public-private partnerships, and enhancing community engagement to build trust and improve trial participation.
Distribution of clinical oncologists, oncology trials, and SDI index across selected African countries.
African Countries with Oncology Clinical Trials
Number of Clinical Oncologists in AfricaN=1759
% of Clinical Oncologists in Africa by Country
Number of Clinical Trials in Africa by Country
% of Clinical Trials in Africa by Country
SDI Index
Egypt
1500
85.
2%
70
46.
36%
Middle
Kenya
6
0.
34%
27
17.
88%
Low-Middle
Nigeria
64
3.
63%
17
11.
26%
Low-Middle
Ethiopia
6
0.
34%
12
7.
95%
Low
South Africa
40
2.
27%
6
3.
97%
Middle
Tanzania
6
0.
34%
6
3.
97%
Low-Middle
Ghana
10
0.
57%
5
3.
31%
Low-Middle
Morocco
28
1.
59%
1
0.
66%
Low-Middle
Others
99
5.
63%
7
4.
64%
Total
1759
100%
151
100%.
Related Results
Scholarly publishing in sub-Saharan Africa in the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities
Scholarly publishing in sub-Saharan Africa in the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities
A free flow of ideas and information is vital to the process of scientific inquiry, and in turn to the ability to address economic, environmental and social development issues both...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Afrikanske smede
Afrikanske smede
African Smiths Cultural-historical and sociological problems illuminated by studies among the Tuareg and by comparative analysisIn KUML 1957 in connection with a description of sla...
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction
As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Global Oncology Research and Training Collaborations Led by the National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Designated Cancer Centers: Results From the 2018 NCI/ASCO Global Oncology Survey of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers
Global Oncology Research and Training Collaborations Led by the National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Designated Cancer Centers: Results From the 2018 NCI/ASCO Global Oncology Survey of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers
PURPOSE The National Cancer Institute (NCI)–Designated Cancer Centers (NDCCs) are active in global oncology research and training, leading collaborations that contribute to the evi...
Accuracy of medical oncology prognosis for patients with metastatic cancer evaluated for enrollment onto an ongoing randomized clinical trial.
Accuracy of medical oncology prognosis for patients with metastatic cancer evaluated for enrollment onto an ongoing randomized clinical trial.
12063 Background: For patients with metastatic cancer, a key aspect of interdisciplinary care has involved the overall prognosis provided by Medical Oncology, which often dictates...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...
Continuity of care: Perspectives of participants, investigators, and healthcare providers after trial completion in South Africa
Continuity of care: Perspectives of participants, investigators, and healthcare providers after trial completion in South Africa
Abstract
Background
Despite decades of updates to frameworks and guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials, what happens to participants when a trial ends rem...

