Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Observation of peri-implant bone loss rates in patients visiting dentist—A retrospective evaluation of patients of a faculty hospital for one year

View through CrossRef
Background Many studies have been published on the relationship between different parameters with marginal bone loss around implants. The results of these studies vary, but some variables such as smoking or certain systemic conditions are more likely to predispose or exacerbate the resorption around implants. The aim of this study was to determine the rates of implants with radiographically detected marginal bone loss and to determine whether there is a relationship between the severity of destruction and certain risk factors like location of implant, restoration type, systemic condition, age, sex or smoking habits. Materials and Methods Panoramic radiographs obtained for 1 year were examined. Patients with bone loss around the implant were classified according to the region of implant placement, type of restoration on implants, systemic diseases, and smoking habits. The rate of bone loss around the implants was recorded as the resorption score. Double and multiple comparison tests were applied to observe whether the resorption scores were related to the variables. Results Of 17,352 patients, 1,465 had at least one implant, and 1,116 of these had no bone loss. A total of 181 patients (863 implants) included in the study, there was a weak correlation between age (p = 0.017) and resorption rate. Implants supporting bridge restorations had higher resorption scores. Gender, age, and systemic conditions alone are not effective in increasing peri-implant bone loss (p < 0.05); therefore, placing implants in the mandible (p = 0.020) or using implants to support bridge restorations(p = 0.027) may make implants more vulnerable to resorption.
Title: Observation of peri-implant bone loss rates in patients visiting dentist—A retrospective evaluation of patients of a faculty hospital for one year
Description:
Background Many studies have been published on the relationship between different parameters with marginal bone loss around implants.
The results of these studies vary, but some variables such as smoking or certain systemic conditions are more likely to predispose or exacerbate the resorption around implants.
The aim of this study was to determine the rates of implants with radiographically detected marginal bone loss and to determine whether there is a relationship between the severity of destruction and certain risk factors like location of implant, restoration type, systemic condition, age, sex or smoking habits.
Materials and Methods Panoramic radiographs obtained for 1 year were examined.
Patients with bone loss around the implant were classified according to the region of implant placement, type of restoration on implants, systemic diseases, and smoking habits.
The rate of bone loss around the implants was recorded as the resorption score.
Double and multiple comparison tests were applied to observe whether the resorption scores were related to the variables.
Results Of 17,352 patients, 1,465 had at least one implant, and 1,116 of these had no bone loss.
A total of 181 patients (863 implants) included in the study, there was a weak correlation between age (p = 0.
017) and resorption rate.
Implants supporting bridge restorations had higher resorption scores.
Gender, age, and systemic conditions alone are not effective in increasing peri-implant bone loss (p < 0.
05); therefore, placing implants in the mandible (p = 0.
020) or using implants to support bridge restorations(p = 0.
027) may make implants more vulnerable to resorption.

Related Results

Peri-implantitis: risk factors and outcome of reconstructive therapy
Peri-implantitis: risk factors and outcome of reconstructive therapy
This thesis is focused on (I) the outcome of reconstructive treatment of peri-implant defects and (II) risk factors for the development of peri-implantitis. Background An increas...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Dental implants have shown to be a reliable tool for single, multiple and full-arch rehabilitations 1. Dental implants have a very high success rate in terms of osseointegration, h...
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
AbstractBackgroundThe need for soft tissue grafting at implant sites for preventing and treating peri‐implant diseases is a currently investigated and debated topic.PurposeThe aim ...
Techniques to Remove Press-Fit Osseointegration Implants
Techniques to Remove Press-Fit Osseointegration Implants
Background: Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees (TOFA) has proven to consistently, significantly improve the quality of life and...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...

Back to Top