Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Change and its Risk Factors in Patients Presenting to a Medical Center: A 7-year Cross-sectional Study

View through CrossRef
<p>Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the amount of peri-implant bone loss detected on digital panoramic radiographs in patient presenting to Chi-Mei medical center and to determine the factors associated with peri-implant bone loss. Materials and Methods: The panoramic radiographs of patient who presenting to Chi-Mei medical center (CMH) form year of 2008 to 2014 were screened. Those with at least one dental implant were selected and further evaluated. Submerged implants, implants with healing cap, failure implants, and implants with blurred vision were excluded. For patient level, sex, age and number of implants were recorded. For each implant obscured on the radiographs, location, type of implant-abutment connection, type of prosthesis, implant placed at CMH or non-CMH were recorded. The amount of peri-implant bone loss (PIBL) was assessed at the mesial and distal aspect using magnifying option. Clinical features of patients and implants were separately presented by descriptive statistics. Two multiple logistic regression models were also performed. Results: A total of 34.83% (650/1866) implants with detectable bone loss were identified. According to the result of chi-square test, age, implant-abutment connections and type of prosthesis were separately shown a significant influence on PIBL. Patients older than 25 years old have greater than 2.5 times risk of developing bone loss than younger patients. Comparing to the bone level with butt-joint connections, tissue level and bone level with platform switch connection separately significantly decrease 93.5% and 59.2% risk of bone loss. For the type of prosthesis evaluation, fix partial denture, overdenture and full mouth fix complete denture increased 1.97, 2.39 and 1.53 times risk of bone loss. Conclusion: Among these patients presenting to CMH with implants, the prevalence rate of peri-implant bone loss was 34.83% in implant level. Age, different implant-abutment connection designs and type of prosthesis could play a major role in peri-implant bone loss.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>
Title: Evaluation of Peri-implant Bone Change and its Risk Factors in Patients Presenting to a Medical Center: A 7-year Cross-sectional Study
Description:
<p>Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the amount of peri-implant bone loss detected on digital panoramic radiographs in patient presenting to Chi-Mei medical center and to determine the factors associated with peri-implant bone loss.
Materials and Methods: The panoramic radiographs of patient who presenting to Chi-Mei medical center (CMH) form year of 2008 to 2014 were screened.
Those with at least one dental implant were selected and further evaluated.
Submerged implants, implants with healing cap, failure implants, and implants with blurred vision were excluded.
For patient level, sex, age and number of implants were recorded.
For each implant obscured on the radiographs, location, type of implant-abutment connection, type of prosthesis, implant placed at CMH or non-CMH were recorded.
The amount of peri-implant bone loss (PIBL) was assessed at the mesial and distal aspect using magnifying option.
Clinical features of patients and implants were separately presented by descriptive statistics.
Two multiple logistic regression models were also performed.
Results: A total of 34.
83% (650/1866) implants with detectable bone loss were identified.
According to the result of chi-square test, age, implant-abutment connections and type of prosthesis were separately shown a significant influence on PIBL.
Patients older than 25 years old have greater than 2.
5 times risk of developing bone loss than younger patients.
Comparing to the bone level with butt-joint connections, tissue level and bone level with platform switch connection separately significantly decrease 93.
5% and 59.
2% risk of bone loss.
For the type of prosthesis evaluation, fix partial denture, overdenture and full mouth fix complete denture increased 1.
97, 2.
39 and 1.
53 times risk of bone loss.
Conclusion: Among these patients presenting to CMH with implants, the prevalence rate of peri-implant bone loss was 34.
83% in implant level.
Age, different implant-abutment connection designs and type of prosthesis could play a major role in peri-implant bone loss.
</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>.

Related Results

Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Dental implants have shown to be a reliable tool for single, multiple and full-arch rehabilitations 1. Dental implants have a very high success rate in terms of osseointegration, h...
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
Soft tissue features of peri‐implant diseases and related treatment
AbstractBackgroundThe need for soft tissue grafting at implant sites for preventing and treating peri‐implant diseases is a currently investigated and debated topic.PurposeThe aim ...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Subgingival microbiome in patients with healthy and ailing dental implants
Subgingival microbiome in patients with healthy and ailing dental implants
AbstractDental implants are commonly used to replace missing teeth. However, the dysbiotic polymicrobial communities of peri-implant sites are responsible for peri-implant diseases...
Evaluation of the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma therapy in peri-implant soft tissue remodeling
Evaluation of the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma therapy in peri-implant soft tissue remodeling
Relevance. Peri-implant soft tissue management remains a frequent clinical challenge in dental practice. Adequate thickness and width of keratinized peri-implan...
Poster 107: The Use of Coacervate Sustained Release System to Identify the Most Potent BMP for Bone Regeneration
Poster 107: The Use of Coacervate Sustained Release System to Identify the Most Potent BMP for Bone Regeneration
Objectives: Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) belong to the transforming growth factor superfamily that were first discovered by Marshall Urist. There are 14 B...

Back to Top