Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dimensions of Posterior Implant Restorations Related to Intra‐Coronal Cantilever and Occlusal Forces: An In Vitro Study
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACTObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to investigate the relation of the implant position to the implant crown and analyze the location and magnitude of bite force.Materials and MethodsThe dimensions of 49 posterior implant‐supported restorations were recorded in terms of: 1. implant diameter, 2. crown length, 3. crown width, 4. crown height, 5. occlusal surface of the restoration. The crown/implant height was measured and the distance between the implant center and the restoration center revealed the size of intra‐coronal cantilevers. The occlusal force analysis determined the point and magnitude of loading. Correlation coefficient r was used for the statistical process and statistical control was carried out with the aid of t‐test with minimum level of significance p < 0.05.Results
The mean crown‐to‐implant ratio was 0.9 and in short implants (< 10mm) the ratio was 1.28.
Intra‐coronal cantilever extensions ranged from 2.1 mm to 6.35 mm depending on crown size.
Occlusal loading was identified in cantilever areas of the crown.
Conclusions
Implant center deviates from crown center in 71%–82% of the cases depending on site location.
Implants with non‐ideal position may support a functionally occluding crown.
Clinical SignificanceIntra‐coronal cantilevers are a critical factor to avoid clinical complications and should be taken under consideration both in the planning and fabrication phase of implant restorations.
Title: Dimensions of Posterior Implant Restorations Related to Intra‐Coronal Cantilever and Occlusal Forces: An In Vitro Study
Description:
ABSTRACTObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to investigate the relation of the implant position to the implant crown and analyze the location and magnitude of bite force.
Materials and MethodsThe dimensions of 49 posterior implant‐supported restorations were recorded in terms of: 1.
implant diameter, 2.
crown length, 3.
crown width, 4.
crown height, 5.
occlusal surface of the restoration.
The crown/implant height was measured and the distance between the implant center and the restoration center revealed the size of intra‐coronal cantilevers.
The occlusal force analysis determined the point and magnitude of loading.
Correlation coefficient r was used for the statistical process and statistical control was carried out with the aid of t‐test with minimum level of significance p < 0.
05.
Results
The mean crown‐to‐implant ratio was 0.
9 and in short implants (< 10mm) the ratio was 1.
28.
Intra‐coronal cantilever extensions ranged from 2.
1 mm to 6.
35 mm depending on crown size.
Occlusal loading was identified in cantilever areas of the crown.
Conclusions
Implant center deviates from crown center in 71%–82% of the cases depending on site location.
Implants with non‐ideal position may support a functionally occluding crown.
Clinical SignificanceIntra‐coronal cantilevers are a critical factor to avoid clinical complications and should be taken under consideration both in the planning and fabrication phase of implant restorations.
Related Results
Six-Year Success Rates of Occlusal Amalgam and Glass-Ionomer Restorations Placed Using Three Minimal Intervention Approaches
Six-Year Success Rates of Occlusal Amalgam and Glass-Ionomer Restorations Placed Using Three Minimal Intervention Approaches
The present randomised clinical trial was aimed at comparing three minimally invasive restorative treatment approaches for managing dental caries in occlusal surfaces using a non-g...
The accuracy of anatomic landmarks on the occlusal plane: a comparative study between conventional and 3D image method
The accuracy of anatomic landmarks on the occlusal plane: a comparative study between conventional and 3D image method
Abstract
Background
To establish the occlusal plane, the conventional methods for facial analysis to gain accurate alignment of the occlusal plane a...
Long-term clinical outcomes of immediate loading versus nonimmediate loading in single-implant restorations: An umbrella review
Long-term clinical outcomes of immediate loading versus nonimmediate loading in single-implant restorations: An umbrella review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Immediate loading (IL) offers patients the advantage of reduced treatment time by immediate prosthes...
Comparative Study of Different Materials for Occlusal Matrix Technique in Posterior Teeth
Comparative Study of Different Materials for Occlusal Matrix Technique in Posterior Teeth
Posterior composite restorations are difficult to contour and polish due to their occlusal anatomy and opposing occlusion. Our study describes a technique for duplicating occlusal ...
Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations
Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations
SUMMARY
Objective: For decades, resin composites have been used with increasing frequency as posterior restorative materials, because of the demand for aesthetic restoratio...
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Dental implants have shown to be a reliable tool for single, multiple and full-arch rehabilitations 1. Dental implants have a very high success rate in terms of osseointegration, h...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Cement Selection for Implant‐Supported Crowns Fabricated with Different Luting Space Settings
Cement Selection for Implant‐Supported Crowns Fabricated with Different Luting Space Settings
AbstractPurpose: To measure and compare the retentive strength of cements specifically formulated for luting restorations onto implant abutments and to investigate the effect of va...

