Javascript must be enabled to continue!
BLAST RESISTANCE TESTING METHODS FOR UNDERGROUND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF FORTIFIED FACILITIES AND PROTECTIVE SHELTERS SUBJECTED TO BURIED ARTILLERY MUNITION EXPLOSIONS
View through CrossRef
For conducting defensive operations, serving at checkpoints, and performing other tasks that require safe conditions for military personnel, special structures and other fortification equipment elements are widely used. In recent years, domestic manufacturers have intensified their efforts in developing and producing such structures. However, not all fortified facilities or shelters can provide adequate protection for military personnel and civilians against the effects of munitions. Some of these shortcomings are revealed during testing conducted according to established methodologies.
As stated by authors of the article, existing testing methods for fortified facilities and protective shelters have not sufficiently addressed the underground structural components resistance to seismic waves and fragments resulting from the explosion of artillery munition with delayed-action fuses. Neglecting have serious consequences for human safety, as manufacturers often focus more on the protective properties of above-ground elements, assuming that the underground portion is adequately protected by the soil. Existing testing methods require improvement, in particular the development and substantiation of new blast resistance testing methods for underground structural components of fortified facilities and protective shelters subjected to buried artillery munition explosions.
The approaches proposed in this article aim to improve the quality and objectivity of evaluating the fortified facilities and protective shelters’ ability to withstand shock waves distributed through the soil, as well as fragmentation fields. The articles’ materials are based on calculations involving one of the most powerful artillery munitions used by Russian troops – the 152 mm НЕ-64 high-explosive shell. The study results consider factors such as the purpose and conditions of fortified facilities and protective shelters use, the НЕ-64 shell characteristics, soil properties, and physical processes that occur following buried artillery munition explosions. The authors propose using these methods during blast resistance testing for underground structural components of fortified facilities and protective shelters.
State Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment Testing and Certification
Title: BLAST RESISTANCE TESTING METHODS FOR UNDERGROUND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF FORTIFIED FACILITIES AND PROTECTIVE SHELTERS SUBJECTED TO BURIED ARTILLERY MUNITION EXPLOSIONS
Description:
For conducting defensive operations, serving at checkpoints, and performing other tasks that require safe conditions for military personnel, special structures and other fortification equipment elements are widely used.
In recent years, domestic manufacturers have intensified their efforts in developing and producing such structures.
However, not all fortified facilities or shelters can provide adequate protection for military personnel and civilians against the effects of munitions.
Some of these shortcomings are revealed during testing conducted according to established methodologies.
As stated by authors of the article, existing testing methods for fortified facilities and protective shelters have not sufficiently addressed the underground structural components resistance to seismic waves and fragments resulting from the explosion of artillery munition with delayed-action fuses.
Neglecting have serious consequences for human safety, as manufacturers often focus more on the protective properties of above-ground elements, assuming that the underground portion is adequately protected by the soil.
Existing testing methods require improvement, in particular the development and substantiation of new blast resistance testing methods for underground structural components of fortified facilities and protective shelters subjected to buried artillery munition explosions.
The approaches proposed in this article aim to improve the quality and objectivity of evaluating the fortified facilities and protective shelters’ ability to withstand shock waves distributed through the soil, as well as fragmentation fields.
The articles’ materials are based on calculations involving one of the most powerful artillery munitions used by Russian troops – the 152 mm НЕ-64 high-explosive shell.
The study results consider factors such as the purpose and conditions of fortified facilities and protective shelters use, the НЕ-64 shell characteristics, soil properties, and physical processes that occur following buried artillery munition explosions.
The authors propose using these methods during blast resistance testing for underground structural components of fortified facilities and protective shelters.
Related Results
METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SELECTING ARTILLERY GUNS FOR REARMAMENT ARTILLERY UNITS
METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO SELECTING ARTILLERY GUNS FOR REARMAMENT ARTILLERY UNITS
The article considers a methodological approach to the selection of artillery guns for the purpose of rearmament of artillery units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which, by taking...
Identification of novel rice blast resistance alleles through sequence-based allele mining
Identification of novel rice blast resistance alleles through sequence-based allele mining
Abstract
Background: As rice ( Oryza sativa ) is the staple food of more than half the world’s population, rice production contributes greatly to global food security. Rice...
Performance of the laminated glass systems under static and blast pressure loading
Performance of the laminated glass systems under static and blast pressure loading
[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] The increase of explosions threats toward civilian targets has raised concerns about a building's safety. Lam...
Numerical simulation of progressive collapse of structures under blast loads
Numerical simulation of progressive collapse of structures under blast loads
The growing need for blast-resistant designs in structural engineering is driven by the rising threat of terrorism, accidental explosions, and the significant risk of progressive c...
Alternative Entrances: Phillip Noyce and Sydney’s Counterculture
Alternative Entrances: Phillip Noyce and Sydney’s Counterculture
Phillip Noyce is one of Australia’s most prominent film makers—a successful feature film director with both iconic Australian narratives and many a Hollywood blockbuster under his ...
Analysis of Rice Blast Resistance Dominant Genes and their Combinations in Japonica Rice
Analysis of Rice Blast Resistance Dominant Genes and their Combinations in Japonica Rice
AbstractRice blast is a disastrous fungal disease affecting rice (Oryza sativa L.) and undermines world food security. Different ecological conditions and genetic backgrounds alter...
Peak Particle Velocity for Blasting Rock Modeling
Peak Particle Velocity for Blasting Rock Modeling
ABSTRACT
Blasting mechanisms are a complex coupling of the rock mass properties and the explosive detonation performance as well as the blast design parameters. B...

