Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Variables Associated With Loss of Fixation of Retrograde Rami Screws in Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries
View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate variables associated with loss of fixation of retrograde rami screws in the treatment of stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injuries.
METHODS:
Design:
Retrospective comparative study.
Setting:
Level 1 trauma center
Patient Selection Criteria:
Stress-positive minimally displaced (<1 cm) LC1 pelvic ring injuries treated with retrograde rami screws.
Outcome Measures and Comparisons:
Loss of fixation, defined as >5 mm of pelvic fracture displacement based on the radiographic tear-drop distance or >5 mm of implant displacement on follow-up radiographs; revision surgery for loss of fixation.
RESULTS:
Thirty-eight patients with 40 retrograde rami screws were analyzed. Median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range 42.5–73.3 years), 71.1% (n = 27/38) were female, and 52.6% (n = 20/38) of injuries were secondary to low-energy mechanisms. Loss of fixation occurred in 17.5% (n = 7/40) of screws with 10% (n = 4/40) requiring revision surgery. On univariate analysis, patients who had a loss of fixation were more likely to have greater dynamic displacement on stress radiographs (22.0 vs. 15.2 mm; median difference 5.6 mm, confidence interval [CI] −19.2 to 10.3; P = 0.04), unicortical rami screws (71.4% vs. 9.1%; proportional difference 62.3%, CI 8.8%–22.6%; P = 0.001), and partially threaded rami screws (71.4% vs. 21.2%; proportional difference 50.2%, CI 10.0%–77.6%; P = 0.01). The remaining variables had no observed association (P ≥ 0.05) with loss of fixation, including age, sex, body mass index, energy of injury mechanism, tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, sacral fracture type, distal rami fractures, rami comminution, number of sacral screws, fully threaded sacral screws, transsacral screws, or rami screw diameter. On multivariate analysis, only unicortical rami screws (P = 0.01) remained associated with loss of fixation.
CONCLUSIONS:
Retrograde rami screws had a high rate of loss of fixation in minimally displaced LC1 pelvic ring injuries, and this was associated with unicortical screws. These screws should be avoided when possible.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Variables Associated With Loss of Fixation of Retrograde Rami Screws in Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injuries
Description:
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate variables associated with loss of fixation of retrograde rami screws in the treatment of stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) injuries.
METHODS:
Design:
Retrospective comparative study.
Setting:
Level 1 trauma center
Patient Selection Criteria:
Stress-positive minimally displaced (<1 cm) LC1 pelvic ring injuries treated with retrograde rami screws.
Outcome Measures and Comparisons:
Loss of fixation, defined as >5 mm of pelvic fracture displacement based on the radiographic tear-drop distance or >5 mm of implant displacement on follow-up radiographs; revision surgery for loss of fixation.
RESULTS:
Thirty-eight patients with 40 retrograde rami screws were analyzed.
Median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range 42.
5–73.
3 years), 71.
1% (n = 27/38) were female, and 52.
6% (n = 20/38) of injuries were secondary to low-energy mechanisms.
Loss of fixation occurred in 17.
5% (n = 7/40) of screws with 10% (n = 4/40) requiring revision surgery.
On univariate analysis, patients who had a loss of fixation were more likely to have greater dynamic displacement on stress radiographs (22.
0 vs.
15.
2 mm; median difference 5.
6 mm, confidence interval [CI] −19.
2 to 10.
3; P = 0.
04), unicortical rami screws (71.
4% vs.
9.
1%; proportional difference 62.
3%, CI 8.
8%–22.
6%; P = 0.
001), and partially threaded rami screws (71.
4% vs.
21.
2%; proportional difference 50.
2%, CI 10.
0%–77.
6%; P = 0.
01).
The remaining variables had no observed association (P ≥ 0.
05) with loss of fixation, including age, sex, body mass index, energy of injury mechanism, tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, sacral fracture type, distal rami fractures, rami comminution, number of sacral screws, fully threaded sacral screws, transsacral screws, or rami screw diameter.
On multivariate analysis, only unicortical rami screws (P = 0.
01) remained associated with loss of fixation.
CONCLUSIONS:
Retrograde rami screws had a high rate of loss of fixation in minimally displaced LC1 pelvic ring injuries, and this was associated with unicortical screws.
These screws should be avoided when possible.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:
Prognostic Level III.
See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Related Results
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Identification of Safe Channels for Screws in the Anterior Pelvic Ring Fixation System
Identification of Safe Channels for Screws in the Anterior Pelvic Ring Fixation System
Abstract
Background: There have been few studies on insertion of fixation screws for the anterior pelvic ring system. Objective: To identify safe channels for fixation scre...
Identification of Safe Channels for Screws in the Anterior Pelvic Ring Fixation System
Identification of Safe Channels for Screws in the Anterior Pelvic Ring Fixation System
Abstract
Background: There have been few studies on insertion of fixation screws for the anterior pelvic ring system.Objective: To identify safe channels for fixation screw...
PELVIC FRACTURES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, ANATOMY, MECHANISM OF INJURY, CLASSIFICATION, IMAGING PRESENTATION, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, MANAGEMENT AND COMPLICATIONS
PELVIC FRACTURES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, ANATOMY, MECHANISM OF INJURY, CLASSIFICATION, IMAGING PRESENTATION, CLINICAL PRESENTATION, MANAGEMENT AND COMPLICATIONS
Introduction: Open fractures of the pelvis represent one of the most fatal injuries within musculoskeletal trauma so they must be treated correctly, adjusting to a multidisciplinar...
Combined Anterior–Posterior versus Posterior-Only Fixation of Stress-Positive Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 (LC1) Pelvic Ring Injuries
Combined Anterior–Posterior versus Posterior-Only Fixation of Stress-Positive Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 (LC1) Pelvic Ring Injuries
Objectives:
To compare hospital outcomes and late displacement between stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries treated...
Functional Outcome of Percutaneous Ilio-sacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries
Functional Outcome of Percutaneous Ilio-sacral Screw Fixation for Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to assess the functional outcomes of percutaneous ilio-sacral screw fixation in the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injuries.
METHODS
A total of 34 (...
Pullout strength of monocortical and bicortical screws in meta -physeal and diaphyseal regions of the canine humerus
Pullout strength of monocortical and bicortical screws in meta -physeal and diaphyseal regions of the canine humerus
Summary
Objective: Monocortical screws are commonly employed in locking plate fixation, but specific recommendations for their placement are lacking and use of short mono...
Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation in an athletic population: screw versus suture button fixation
Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation in an athletic population: screw versus suture button fixation
Background:
Primarily ligamentous Lisfranc injuries occur in athletic populations. Unstable Lisfranc injuries are treated with internal fixation or arthrodesis. Interna...

