Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Awareness and Knowledge of Biosimilars Among Rheumatologists and Patients

View through CrossRef
Background: Biosimilars offer cost-effective alternatives to biologics in rheumatology; however, their adoption remains hindered by physician hesitancy and patient misconceptions. Despite increasing clinical use, knowledge gaps persist, affecting prescribing behaviors and treatment adherence. Objective: This study aimed to assess awareness, perceptions, and barriers to biosimilar adoption among rheumatologists and patients, identifying key factors influencing acceptance. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 22 rheumatologists and 66 patients in clinical rheumatology settings. Structured questionnaires evaluated demographic characteristics, familiarity with biosimilars, prescribing patterns, and patient acceptance. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25, employing chi-square tests and t-tests to assess statistical significance, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. Results: Among rheumatologists, 80% (n=18, p=0.021) were very familiar with biosimilars, and 75% (n=16, p=0.017) had received formal education, yet only 70% (n=15, p=0.015) had prescribed them. Among patients, 60% (n=40, p=0.003) rated their biosimilar knowledge as poor, and 55% (n=36, p=0.006) were unsure about their safety and efficacy. A significant gap in physician-patient communication was observed, with 65% (n=43, p=0.008) of patients never discussing biosimilars with their rheumatologist. Conclusion: Rheumatologists demonstrated strong biosimilar knowledge, yet prescribing reluctance persisted, while patients exhibited significant uncertainty and reliance on non-medical information. Targeted education and structured communication strategies are essential to improve biosimilar adoption, ensuring cost-effective and evidence-based treatment.
Title: Awareness and Knowledge of Biosimilars Among Rheumatologists and Patients
Description:
Background: Biosimilars offer cost-effective alternatives to biologics in rheumatology; however, their adoption remains hindered by physician hesitancy and patient misconceptions.
Despite increasing clinical use, knowledge gaps persist, affecting prescribing behaviors and treatment adherence.
Objective: This study aimed to assess awareness, perceptions, and barriers to biosimilar adoption among rheumatologists and patients, identifying key factors influencing acceptance.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 22 rheumatologists and 66 patients in clinical rheumatology settings.
Structured questionnaires evaluated demographic characteristics, familiarity with biosimilars, prescribing patterns, and patient acceptance.
Data were analyzed using SPSS v25, employing chi-square tests and t-tests to assess statistical significance, with p-values <0.
05 considered significant.
Results: Among rheumatologists, 80% (n=18, p=0.
021) were very familiar with biosimilars, and 75% (n=16, p=0.
017) had received formal education, yet only 70% (n=15, p=0.
015) had prescribed them.
Among patients, 60% (n=40, p=0.
003) rated their biosimilar knowledge as poor, and 55% (n=36, p=0.
006) were unsure about their safety and efficacy.
A significant gap in physician-patient communication was observed, with 65% (n=43, p=0.
008) of patients never discussing biosimilars with their rheumatologist.
Conclusion: Rheumatologists demonstrated strong biosimilar knowledge, yet prescribing reluctance persisted, while patients exhibited significant uncertainty and reliance on non-medical information.
Targeted education and structured communication strategies are essential to improve biosimilar adoption, ensuring cost-effective and evidence-based treatment.

Related Results

Evaluation of Rheumatologists’ Teledermatology Practices and Perspectives
Evaluation of Rheumatologists’ Teledermatology Practices and Perspectives
Objective: In their regular practice, rheumatologists often come across patients with skin and nail abnormalities, so they need dermatology consultations. A new option available to...
Perspectives toward biosimilars among oncologists: A Malaysian survey
Perspectives toward biosimilars among oncologists: A Malaysian survey
Introduction Biosimilars confer significant cost-saving advantages and expand patients’ access to biologic therapies in cancer care. In line with the increasing...
Rheumatologists’ beliefs about medication barely differ from patients’ medication beliefs
Rheumatologists’ beliefs about medication barely differ from patients’ medication beliefs
Rationale, aims and objectivesStudies suggest that both healthcare providers’ and patients’ beliefs about medication influence medication adherence. This study aims to describe and...
Biosimilars in Oncology
Biosimilars in Oncology
The escalating cost of cancer care is placing an increasing burden on healthcare systems worldwide, largely a result of expensive biologic therapies. With the patents on many biolo...
Perception toward Biosimilars and Nonmedical Switching: A Cross-sectional Survey among Arab Rheumatologists
Perception toward Biosimilars and Nonmedical Switching: A Cross-sectional Survey among Arab Rheumatologists
Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the level of knowledge and acceptance for biosimilars and nonmedical switching in Arab rheumatologists. ...
Biosimilars: New guns for the treatment of rheumatologic patients?
Biosimilars: New guns for the treatment of rheumatologic patients?
The advent of biological therapies in 2000s has represented a real revolution in the treatment of patients affected by rheumatic diseases, but biosimilars represent nowadays a furt...
Biosimilars: Shaping the Future of Haematology
Biosimilars: Shaping the Future of Haematology
Prof Robin Foà opened the symposium by highlighting how improving healthcare and an ageing population are increasing the burden on healthcare resources and creating challenges in m...

Back to Top