Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Biosimilars in Oncology

View through CrossRef
The escalating cost of cancer care is placing an increasing burden on healthcare systems worldwide, largely a result of expensive biologic therapies. With the patents on many biologics expiring, interest in biosimilars is rising. Biosimilars of biologic agents used for cancer treatment and supportive care are making their appearance in the US; this article therefore aims to increase understanding of the biosimilars concept. Biosimilars are very comparable to their reference products, but because of their size and complexity, are not identical. However, the inherent structural differences between biologics and their reference products may not translate to clinically meaningful differences in efficacy and safety. Biosimilars offer potential cost savings but present a challenge in terms of establishing a regulatory pathway. Regulatory approval requires comparative analytical and clinical studies in order to characterize and demonstrate the absence of clinically meaningful differences between biosimilars and their reference products. Initial approval may not include interchangeability, as additional evidence may be required before a biosimilar can be designated interchangeable with its reference product. A framework for the approval of biosimilars was established by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2006 with the first biosimilar approved in April, 2006. Thus, the experience in Europe provides valuable insights into the use of biosimilars. The widespread use of biosimilars has the potential to reduce healthcare expenditure, as well as improving patient access without compromising patient outcomes, but clinician education and acceptance is crucial.
Title: Biosimilars in Oncology
Description:
The escalating cost of cancer care is placing an increasing burden on healthcare systems worldwide, largely a result of expensive biologic therapies.
With the patents on many biologics expiring, interest in biosimilars is rising.
Biosimilars of biologic agents used for cancer treatment and supportive care are making their appearance in the US; this article therefore aims to increase understanding of the biosimilars concept.
Biosimilars are very comparable to their reference products, but because of their size and complexity, are not identical.
However, the inherent structural differences between biologics and their reference products may not translate to clinically meaningful differences in efficacy and safety.
Biosimilars offer potential cost savings but present a challenge in terms of establishing a regulatory pathway.
Regulatory approval requires comparative analytical and clinical studies in order to characterize and demonstrate the absence of clinically meaningful differences between biosimilars and their reference products.
Initial approval may not include interchangeability, as additional evidence may be required before a biosimilar can be designated interchangeable with its reference product.
A framework for the approval of biosimilars was established by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2006 with the first biosimilar approved in April, 2006.
Thus, the experience in Europe provides valuable insights into the use of biosimilars.
The widespread use of biosimilars has the potential to reduce healthcare expenditure, as well as improving patient access without compromising patient outcomes, but clinician education and acceptance is crucial.

Related Results

Abstract PS19-03: Contemporary patterns of Medicare Utilization and Spending on Herceptin and its Biosimilars in Breast Cancer
Abstract PS19-03: Contemporary patterns of Medicare Utilization and Spending on Herceptin and its Biosimilars in Breast Cancer
Abstract Introduction: A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to and has no clinically meaningful differences from an existing FDA-approved refe...
Canadian prescribers’ attitudes and perceptions about ophthalmic biosimilars
Canadian prescribers’ attitudes and perceptions about ophthalmic biosimilars
Introduction: The first biosimilar entered the Canadian market in 2009 and the first ophthalmic biosimilar was approved in 2022. In 2022, the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (...
Perspectives toward biosimilars among oncologists: A Malaysian survey
Perspectives toward biosimilars among oncologists: A Malaysian survey
Introduction Biosimilars confer significant cost-saving advantages and expand patients’ access to biologic therapies in cancer care. In line with the increasing...
US prescribers’ attitudes and perceptions about biosimilars
US prescribers’ attitudes and perceptions about biosimilars
Introduction: In the United States (US), a legal framework for approving biosimilars was established via the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCI Act). At t...
Identification of Barriers Preventing Biosimiliar Oncology Medication Adoption
Identification of Barriers Preventing Biosimiliar Oncology Medication Adoption
(1) Background: A biosimilar is a biologic medical product that has been approved by the United States Food and Federal Drug Administration (FDA) and is an almost identical copy of...
Comparative efficacy studies of biosimilars: data versus theoretical risks, beliefs, and comfort
Comparative efficacy studies of biosimilars: data versus theoretical risks, beliefs, and comfort
In principle, biosimilars could mitigate the problem of the rising cost of biological medicines. However, the current stringent and non-harmonized regulatory practices hinder compe...

Back to Top