Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Biosimilars in Oncology
View through CrossRef
The escalating cost of cancer care is placing an increasing burden on healthcare systems worldwide, largely a result of expensive biologic therapies. With the patents on many biologics expiring, interest in biosimilars is rising. Biosimilars of biologic agents used for cancer treatment and supportive care are making their appearance in the US; this article therefore aims to increase understanding of the biosimilars concept. Biosimilars are very comparable to their reference products, but because of their size and complexity, are not identical. However, the inherent structural differences between biologics and their reference products may not translate to clinically meaningful differences in efficacy and safety. Biosimilars offer potential cost savings but present a challenge in terms of establishing a regulatory pathway. Regulatory approval requires comparative analytical and clinical studies in order to characterize and demonstrate the absence of clinically meaningful differences between biosimilars and their reference products. Initial approval may not include interchangeability, as additional evidence may be required before a biosimilar can be designated interchangeable with its reference product. A framework for the approval of biosimilars was established by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2006 with the first biosimilar approved in April, 2006. Thus, the experience in Europe provides valuable insights into the use of biosimilars. The widespread use of biosimilars has the potential to reduce healthcare expenditure, as well as improving patient access without compromising patient outcomes, but clinician education and acceptance is crucial.
Title: Biosimilars in Oncology
Description:
The escalating cost of cancer care is placing an increasing burden on healthcare systems worldwide, largely a result of expensive biologic therapies.
With the patents on many biologics expiring, interest in biosimilars is rising.
Biosimilars of biologic agents used for cancer treatment and supportive care are making their appearance in the US; this article therefore aims to increase understanding of the biosimilars concept.
Biosimilars are very comparable to their reference products, but because of their size and complexity, are not identical.
However, the inherent structural differences between biologics and their reference products may not translate to clinically meaningful differences in efficacy and safety.
Biosimilars offer potential cost savings but present a challenge in terms of establishing a regulatory pathway.
Regulatory approval requires comparative analytical and clinical studies in order to characterize and demonstrate the absence of clinically meaningful differences between biosimilars and their reference products.
Initial approval may not include interchangeability, as additional evidence may be required before a biosimilar can be designated interchangeable with its reference product.
A framework for the approval of biosimilars was established by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2006 with the first biosimilar approved in April, 2006.
Thus, the experience in Europe provides valuable insights into the use of biosimilars.
The widespread use of biosimilars has the potential to reduce healthcare expenditure, as well as improving patient access without compromising patient outcomes, but clinician education and acceptance is crucial.
Related Results
Perspectives toward biosimilars among oncologists: A Malaysian survey
Perspectives toward biosimilars among oncologists: A Malaysian survey
Introduction
Biosimilars confer significant cost-saving advantages and expand patients’ access to biologic therapies in cancer care. In line with the increasing...
The Current Use and Future Perspectives of Biosimilars in Pediatric Healthcare: A Narrative Review
The Current Use and Future Perspectives of Biosimilars in Pediatric Healthcare: A Narrative Review
ABSTRACT
Background and Aims
The integration of biosimilars into pediatric healthcare represents a significant evolution ...
Biosimilars: New guns for the treatment of rheumatologic patients?
Biosimilars: New guns for the treatment of rheumatologic patients?
The advent of biological therapies in 2000s has represented a real revolution in the treatment of patients affected by rheumatic diseases, but biosimilars represent nowadays a furt...
Biosimilars: Shaping the Future of Haematology
Biosimilars: Shaping the Future of Haematology
Prof Robin Foà opened the symposium by highlighting how improving healthcare and an ageing population are increasing the burden on healthcare resources and creating challenges in m...
Regulatory Guidelines and Production Planning Strategies for Biosimilars in the USA
Regulatory Guidelines and Production Planning Strategies for Biosimilars in the USA
At present, biosimilar projects are ruling the pharma market. This article aims to show that project management is crucialin developing biosimilars. Bad project management will giv...
Biosimilars in Hematology: Increasing Choice, Expanding Access
Biosimilars in Hematology: Increasing Choice, Expanding Access
Biologicals have revolutionised modern medicine by offering vital therapeutic options to treat or prevent complex, disabling, and life-threatening diseases. Between 2013 and 2018, ...
Navigating adalimumab biosimilars: an expert opinion
Navigating adalimumab biosimilars: an expert opinion
The patent expiry of Humira
®
in 2018 opened up the current European market to eight adalimumab biosimilars – (in alphabetical order) Amgevita
®...
Perception toward Biosimilars and Nonmedical Switching: A Cross-sectional Survey among Arab Rheumatologists
Perception toward Biosimilars and Nonmedical Switching: A Cross-sectional Survey among Arab Rheumatologists
Objective:
The aim of this study is to assess the level of knowledge and acceptance for biosimilars and nonmedical switching in Arab rheumatologists.
...

