Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Awareness and Knowledge of Biosimilars Among Rheumatologists and Patients
View through CrossRef
Background: Biosimilars offer cost-effective alternatives to biologics in rheumatology; however, their adoption remains hindered by physician hesitancy and patient misconceptions. Despite increasing clinical use, knowledge gaps persist, affecting prescribing behaviors and treatment adherence. Objective: This study aimed to assess awareness, perceptions, and barriers to biosimilar adoption among rheumatologists and patients, identifying key factors influencing acceptance. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 22 rheumatologists and 66 patients in clinical rheumatology settings. Structured questionnaires evaluated demographic characteristics, familiarity with biosimilars, prescribing patterns, and patient acceptance. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25, employing chi-square tests and t-tests to assess statistical significance, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. Results: Among rheumatologists, 80% (n=18, p=0.021) were very familiar with biosimilars, and 75% (n=16, p=0.017) had received formal education, yet only 70% (n=15, p=0.015) had prescribed them. Among patients, 60% (n=40, p=0.003) rated their biosimilar knowledge as poor, and 55% (n=36, p=0.006) were unsure about their safety and efficacy. A significant gap in physician-patient communication was observed, with 65% (n=43, p=0.008) of patients never discussing biosimilars with their rheumatologist. Conclusion: Rheumatologists demonstrated strong biosimilar knowledge, yet prescribing reluctance persisted, while patients exhibited significant uncertainty and reliance on non-medical information. Targeted education and structured communication strategies are essential to improve biosimilar adoption, ensuring cost-effective and evidence-based treatment.
Link Medical Institute
Title: Awareness and Knowledge of Biosimilars Among Rheumatologists and Patients
Description:
Background: Biosimilars offer cost-effective alternatives to biologics in rheumatology; however, their adoption remains hindered by physician hesitancy and patient misconceptions.
Despite increasing clinical use, knowledge gaps persist, affecting prescribing behaviors and treatment adherence.
Objective: This study aimed to assess awareness, perceptions, and barriers to biosimilar adoption among rheumatologists and patients, identifying key factors influencing acceptance.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 22 rheumatologists and 66 patients in clinical rheumatology settings.
Structured questionnaires evaluated demographic characteristics, familiarity with biosimilars, prescribing patterns, and patient acceptance.
Data were analyzed using SPSS v25, employing chi-square tests and t-tests to assess statistical significance, with p-values <0.
05 considered significant.
Results: Among rheumatologists, 80% (n=18, p=0.
021) were very familiar with biosimilars, and 75% (n=16, p=0.
017) had received formal education, yet only 70% (n=15, p=0.
015) had prescribed them.
Among patients, 60% (n=40, p=0.
003) rated their biosimilar knowledge as poor, and 55% (n=36, p=0.
006) were unsure about their safety and efficacy.
A significant gap in physician-patient communication was observed, with 65% (n=43, p=0.
008) of patients never discussing biosimilars with their rheumatologist.
Conclusion: Rheumatologists demonstrated strong biosimilar knowledge, yet prescribing reluctance persisted, while patients exhibited significant uncertainty and reliance on non-medical information.
Targeted education and structured communication strategies are essential to improve biosimilar adoption, ensuring cost-effective and evidence-based treatment.
Related Results
Evaluation of Rheumatologists’ Teledermatology Practices and Perspectives
Evaluation of Rheumatologists’ Teledermatology Practices and Perspectives
Objective: In their regular practice, rheumatologists often come across patients with skin and nail abnormalities, so they need dermatology consultations. A new option available to...
Biosimilars in Oncology
Biosimilars in Oncology
The escalating cost of cancer care is placing an increasing burden on healthcare systems worldwide, largely a result of expensive biologic therapies. With the patents on many biolo...
Biosimilars: New guns for the treatment of rheumatologic patients?
Biosimilars: New guns for the treatment of rheumatologic patients?
The advent of biological therapies in 2000s has represented a real revolution in the treatment of patients affected by rheumatic diseases, but biosimilars represent nowadays a furt...
Biosimilars: Shaping the Future of Haematology
Biosimilars: Shaping the Future of Haematology
Prof Robin Foà opened the symposium by highlighting how improving healthcare and an ageing population are increasing the burden on healthcare resources and creating challenges in m...
Divergent Conceptualizations and Management Strategies for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Qualitative Multispecialty Study
Divergent Conceptualizations and Management Strategies for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Qualitative Multispecialty Study
Abstract
Background
Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is the most prevalent subtype of thoracic outlet syndrome and remains one of the most controversial conditions in per...
Biosimilars in Hematology: Increasing Choice, Expanding Access
Biosimilars in Hematology: Increasing Choice, Expanding Access
Biologicals have revolutionised modern medicine by offering vital therapeutic options to treat or prevent complex, disabling, and life-threatening diseases. Between 2013 and 2018, ...
Survey of biosimilar adoption across oncology pharmacy practices.
Survey of biosimilar adoption across oncology pharmacy practices.
e18813 Background: Use of biosimilars is an effective strategy in expanding access to care and lowering healthcare costs. Literature about the successes, challenges, and best prac...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...

