Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Differences between integrated and non‐integrated plans in Medicare Advantage

View through CrossRef
AbstractObjectiveTo understand differences in financial performance, quality performance, supplemental benefits provision, and enrollee composition between integrated and non‐integrated plans in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program.Data SourcesWe used data from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services for 2015–2017. We included 156 integrated MA plans (31 unique contracts) and 2096 non‐integrated MA plans (392 unique contracts).Study DesignWe estimated linear probably models for financial performance, quality performance, supplemental benefits provision, and enrollee composition with state fixed effects and contract random effects. We adjusted for county‐level market structure‐related factors, cost‐related factors, and demand‐related factors. Our primary independent variable was an indicator of plan‐provider integration.Principal FindingsIntegrated MA plans were associated with $19.4 (95% CI: 9.2, 29.7) and $16.6 (95% CI: 10.3, 22.9) higher Part C and Part D monthly premiums, but were associated with higher star quality ratings. There were no significant differences in revenues and plan payments per enrollee between integrated and non‐integrated MA plans. Integrated MA plans were associated with $40.5 (95% CI: −54.0, −26.9) lower non‐claims costs than non‐integrated MA plans. There was limited evidence that integrated MA plans provided more generous supplemental benefits than non‐integrated MA plans. Enrollment rates in integrated MA plans were particularly low among socially marginalized groups (3.4 [95% CI: −5.9, −1.0], 4.7 [95% CI: −8.5, −0.9], and 4.4 [95% CI: −6.4, −2.4] percentage points lower among non‐Hispanic Black, Medicare–Medicaid dual eligible, and the disabled).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that integrated MA plans may achieve higher efficiency and quality, but these benefits may not be experienced by all beneficiaries due to disparities in enrollment. As these models continue to spread, it is critical to develop policies to ensure that MA enrollees have equal access to integrated plans.
Title: Differences between integrated and non‐integrated plans in Medicare Advantage
Description:
AbstractObjectiveTo understand differences in financial performance, quality performance, supplemental benefits provision, and enrollee composition between integrated and non‐integrated plans in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program.
Data SourcesWe used data from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services for 2015–2017.
We included 156 integrated MA plans (31 unique contracts) and 2096 non‐integrated MA plans (392 unique contracts).
Study DesignWe estimated linear probably models for financial performance, quality performance, supplemental benefits provision, and enrollee composition with state fixed effects and contract random effects.
We adjusted for county‐level market structure‐related factors, cost‐related factors, and demand‐related factors.
Our primary independent variable was an indicator of plan‐provider integration.
Principal FindingsIntegrated MA plans were associated with $19.
4 (95% CI: 9.
2, 29.
7) and $16.
6 (95% CI: 10.
3, 22.
9) higher Part C and Part D monthly premiums, but were associated with higher star quality ratings.
There were no significant differences in revenues and plan payments per enrollee between integrated and non‐integrated MA plans.
Integrated MA plans were associated with $40.
5 (95% CI: −54.
0, −26.
9) lower non‐claims costs than non‐integrated MA plans.
There was limited evidence that integrated MA plans provided more generous supplemental benefits than non‐integrated MA plans.
Enrollment rates in integrated MA plans were particularly low among socially marginalized groups (3.
4 [95% CI: −5.
9, −1.
0], 4.
7 [95% CI: −8.
5, −0.
9], and 4.
4 [95% CI: −6.
4, −2.
4] percentage points lower among non‐Hispanic Black, Medicare–Medicaid dual eligible, and the disabled).
ConclusionsOur findings suggest that integrated MA plans may achieve higher efficiency and quality, but these benefits may not be experienced by all beneficiaries due to disparities in enrollment.
As these models continue to spread, it is critical to develop policies to ensure that MA enrollees have equal access to integrated plans.

Related Results

Algorithms to Improve Fairness in Medicare Risk Adjustment
Algorithms to Improve Fairness in Medicare Risk Adjustment
Abstract Importance Payment system design creates incentives that impact healthcare spending, access, and outcomes. With Medica...
Stage of Change for Making an Informed Decision about Medicare Health Plans
Stage of Change for Making an Informed Decision about Medicare Health Plans
Objective. To assess the applicability of the transtheoretical model of change (TTM) to informed choice in the Medicare population.Data Sources/Study Setting. Two hundred and thi...
Health System Expansion and Changes in Medicare Beneficiary Utilization of Safety Net Providers
Health System Expansion and Changes in Medicare Beneficiary Utilization of Safety Net Providers
Background: Evidence is limited on insured patients’ use of safety net providers as vertically integrated health systems spread throughout the United States. ...
Medicare Advantage Part B Premium Givebacks and Enrollment
Medicare Advantage Part B Premium Givebacks and Enrollment
ImportanceIn Medicare Advantage (MA), the private component of the Medicare program that enrolls more than half of beneficiaries, an increasing share of plans are offering Part B p...
Making Cuts to Medicare: The Views of Patients, Physicians, and the Public
Making Cuts to Medicare: The Views of Patients, Physicians, and the Public
Purpose Cancer-related expenditures are increasing health care costs. Determining how patients with cancer, oncologists, and the general public view Medicare spending and whether t...
A NEW DATA SET TO EXAMINE HOME HEALTH AGENCIES
A NEW DATA SET TO EXAMINE HOME HEALTH AGENCIES
Abstract Using Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) data from 2015 to 2019, we developed a dataset representing home health agency Medicare patients that w...
Medicare+Choice Appeal Procedures: Reconciling Due Process Rights and Cost Containment
Medicare+Choice Appeal Procedures: Reconciling Due Process Rights and Cost Containment
By signing the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) on August 5, 1997, President Clinton made the most significant changes to Medicare, since its inception in 1965, by adopting market...
Telehealth Benefits Offered by Medicare Advantage Plans in 2020
Telehealth Benefits Offered by Medicare Advantage Plans in 2020
Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze new telehealth benefits offered by Medicare Advantage (MA) plans in 2020 and examine plan characteristics associat...

Back to Top